Part:BBa_K1321339

CBDcenA+Linker, RFC 25 standard

Cellulose binding domain (CBD) of Endoglucanase A (cenA) from Cellulomonas fimi with an endogenous C-terminal linker. The part is in Freiburg format (RFC 25) for ease of use in protein fusions.

Usage and Biology

The cellulose binding domain region occurs at the N-terminus of the cenA gene ([http://www.uniprot.org/uniprot/P07984 UniProt P07984]) and is from the [http://www.cazy.org/CBM2.html CBM family 2].

The linker sequence (PTTSPTPTPTPTTPTPTPTPTPTPTPTVTP) is Pro-Thr box which has an extended conformation and acts as a hinge region (1). The endoglucanase CBDCenA has 50% homology to the exoglucanase CBDcex (BBa_K863101) and the linker is highly conserved in both, but the order of the catalytic, linker and cellulose-binding regions is reversed (2). It has been shown that CBDCenA has the highest binding affinity for crystalline cellulose out of the C. fimi CBDs (3).

Sequence and Features

Assembly Compatibility:

• 10
  COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[10]
• 12
  COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[12]
• 21
  COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[21]
• 23
  COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[23]
• 25
  COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[25]
• 1000
  COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[1000]

Functional Parameters

Protein data table for BioBrick BBa_K1321339 automatically created by the BioBrick-AutoAnnotator version 1.0
Nucleotide sequence in RFC 25: (underlined part encodes the protein)  ATGGCCGGC ... CCCACCGGTTAA  ORF from nucleotide position 1 to 423 (excluding stop-codon)
Amino acid sequence: (RFC 25 scars in shown in bold, other sequence features underlined; both given below) 1  101  MAGAPGCRVDYAVTNQWPGGFGANVTITNLGDPVSSWKLDWTYTAGQRIQQLWNGTASTNGGQVSVTSLPWNGSIPTGGTASFGFNGSWAGSNPTPASFS LNGTTCTGTPTTSPTPTPTPTTPTPTPTPTPTPTPTVTPTG*
Sequence features: (with their position in the amino acid sequence, see the list of supported features) None of the supported features appeared in the sequence
Amino acid composition: Ala (A) 9 (6.4%) Arg (R) 2 (1.4%) Asn (N) 9 (6.4%) Asp (D) 3 (2.1%) Cys (C) 2 (1.4%) Gln (Q) 5 (3.5%) Glu (E) 0 (0.0%) Gly (G) 19 (13.5%) His (H) 0 (0.0%) Ile (I) 3 (2.1%) Leu (L) 5 (3.5%) Lys (K) 1 (0.7%) Met (M) 1 (0.7%) Phe (F) 4 (2.8%) Pro (P) 20 (14.2%) Ser (S) 12 (8.5%) Thr (T) 31 (22.0%) Trp (W) 6 (4.3%) Tyr (Y) 2 (1.4%) Val (V) 7 (5.0%)
Amino acid counting Total number: 141 Positively charged (Arg+Lys): 3 (2.1%) Negatively charged (Asp+Glu): 3 (2.1%) Aromatic (Phe+His+Try+Tyr): 12 (8.5%)	Biochemical parameters Atomic composition: C630H950N168O207S3 Molecular mass [Da]: 14285.7 Theoretical pI: 5.79 Extinction coefficient at 280 nm [M-1 cm-1]: 35980 / 36105 (all Cys red/ox)
Plot for hydrophobicity, charge, predicted secondary structure, solvent accessability, transmembrane helices and disulfid bridges
Codon usage Organism: E. coli B. subtilis S. cerevisiae A. thaliana P. patens Mammals Codon quality (CAI): excellent (0.85) good (0.67) good (0.60) good (0.67) excellent (0.82) good (0.64)
Alignments (obtained from PredictProtein.org)    There were no alignments for this protein in the data base. The BLAST search was initialized and should be ready in a few hours.
Predictions (obtained from PredictProtein.org)
There were no predictions for this protein in the data base. The prediction was initialized and should be ready in a few hours.
The BioBrick-AutoAnnotator was created by TU-Munich 2013 iGEM team. For more information please see the documentation. If you have any questions, comments or suggestions, please leave us a comment.

References

1. Gilkes, N.R. et al., 1989. Structural and functional analysis of a bacterial cellulase by proteolysis. The Journal of biological chemistry, 264(30), pp.17802–8. Available at: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2681184

2. Warren, R.A. et al., 1986. Sequence conservation and region shuffling in an endoglucanase and an exoglucanase from Cellulomonas fimi. Proteins, 1(4), pp.335–41. Available at: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/3130625

3. Kim, H.-D. et al., 2013. Enzyme-linked assay of cellulose-binding domain functions from Cellulomonas fimi on multi-well microtiter plate. Biotechnology and Bioprocess Engineering, 18(3), pp.575–580. Available at: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s12257-013-0242-3