Difference between revisions of "Protein domains/Overview"
Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
There are several different types of protein domains. | There are several different types of protein domains. | ||
− | #'''Head Domain''': The Head domain consists of the | + | #'''Head Domain''': The Head domain consists of the start codon followed immediately by zero or more triplets specifiying an N-terminal tag, such as a protein export tag or lipoprotein binding tag. Preferably, Head domains should begin with an <code>ATG</code> start codon and include codons 2 and 3 of the protein at a minimum. Examples of head domains include |
− | #* | + | #*Start codon |
− | #* | + | #*Start codon and codons 2-3 |
− | #* | + | #*Start codon and signal sequence |
− | #* | + | #*Start codon and affinity tag |
#'''Internal Domains''': Protein domains consist of a series of codon triplets coding for an amino acid sequence without a start codon or stop codon. Multiple Domains can be fused. | #'''Internal Domains''': Protein domains consist of a series of codon triplets coding for an amino acid sequence without a start codon or stop codon. Multiple Domains can be fused. | ||
#'''Special Internal Domains''': Short Domains with specific function may be separately categorized, but obey the same composition rules as normal domains. Examples of special internal domains include | #'''Special Internal Domains''': Short Domains with specific function may be separately categorized, but obey the same composition rules as normal domains. Examples of special internal domains include | ||
Line 35: | Line 35: | ||
− | Although most RBSs are currently specified as separate parts in the Registry, we are now moving to a new design in which the RBS | + | Although most RBSs are currently specified as separate parts in the Registry, we are now moving to a new design in which the RBS and Head domain are combined into a single part termed a '''Translational start'''. The new design has the advantage of encapsulating both ribosome binding and translational initiation within a single part. Our working hypothesis is that the new design will reduce the likelihood of unexpected functional composition problems between the RBS and coding sequence. |
Revision as of 17:57, 21 July 2009
Protein domains encode portions of proteins and can be assembled together to form translational units, a genetic part spanning from translational initiation (the RBS) to translational termination (the stop codon).
There are several different types of protein domains.
- Head Domain: The Head domain consists of the start codon followed immediately by zero or more triplets specifiying an N-terminal tag, such as a protein export tag or lipoprotein binding tag. Preferably, Head domains should begin with an
ATG
start codon and include codons 2 and 3 of the protein at a minimum. Examples of head domains include- Start codon
- Start codon and codons 2-3
- Start codon and signal sequence
- Start codon and affinity tag
- Internal Domains: Protein domains consist of a series of codon triplets coding for an amino acid sequence without a start codon or stop codon. Multiple Domains can be fused.
- Special Internal Domains: Short Domains with specific function may be separately categorized, but obey the same composition rules as normal domains. Examples of special internal domains include
- DNA binding domains
- Dimerization domains
- Kinase domains
- Linkers
- Cleavage sites
- Inteins
- Tail Domain: The C-terminus of a coding region consists of zero or more triplet codons, followed by a pair of TAA stop codons. In the simplest case, the stop codons terrminate the protein with an Stop. More complex Tails may include degradation tags appropriate to the organism (i.e., with different degradation rates). Examples of Tail domain include
- Stop codon
- A degradation tag followed by a stop codon
- An affinity tag followed by a stop codon
Unfortunately, the original BioBrick assembly standard, Assembly standard 10, does not support in-frame assembly of protein domains. (Assembly standard 10 creates an 8 bp scar between adjacent parts.) Therefore, it is recommended that you use an alternate approach to assemble protein domains together to make a translational unit. There are several possible approaches to assembling protein domains including direct synthesis (preferred because it creates no scars) as well as various assembly standards. Regardless of which standard you choose, we suggest that the resulting protein coding sequence or translational unit comply with the original BioBrick assembly standard so that your parts can be assembled with most of the parts in the Registry.
Protein coding sequences should be as follows
GAATTC GCGGCCGC T TCTAG [ATG ... TAA TAA] T ACTAGT A GCGGCCG CTGCAG
Translational units should be as follows
GAATTC GCGGCCGC T TCTAGA G [RBS] [ATG ... TAA TAA] T ACTAGT A GCGGCCG CTGCAG
Although most RBSs are currently specified as separate parts in the Registry, we are now moving to a new design in which the RBS and Head domain are combined into a single part termed a Translational start. The new design has the advantage of encapsulating both ribosome binding and translational initiation within a single part. Our working hypothesis is that the new design will reduce the likelihood of unexpected functional composition problems between the RBS and coding sequence.