Difference between revisions of "Protein domains/Overview"
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
#*RBS, start codon and affinity tag | #*RBS, start codon and affinity tag | ||
#'''Internal Domains''': Protein domains consist of a series of codon triplets coding for an amino acid sequence without a start codon or stop codon. Multiple Domains can be fused. | #'''Internal Domains''': Protein domains consist of a series of codon triplets coding for an amino acid sequence without a start codon or stop codon. Multiple Domains can be fused. | ||
| − | #'''Special Internal Domains''': Short Domains with specific function may be separately categorized, but obey the same composition rules as normal domains | + | #'''Special Internal Domains''': Short Domains with specific function may be separately categorized, but obey the same composition rules as normal domains. Examples of special internal domains include |
#*DNA binding domains | #*DNA binding domains | ||
#*Dimerization domains | #*Dimerization domains | ||
| Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
#*Cleavage sites | #*Cleavage sites | ||
#*Inteins | #*Inteins | ||
| − | #'''Tail Domain''': The C-terminus of a coding region consists of zero or more triplet codons, followed by a pair of TAA stop codons. In the simplest case, the stop codons terrminate the protein with an Stop. More complex Tails may include degradation tags appropriate to the organism (i.e., with different degradation rates). | + | #'''Tail Domain''': The C-terminus of a coding region consists of zero or more triplet codons, followed by a pair of TAA stop codons. In the simplest case, the stop codons terrminate the protein with an Stop. More complex Tails may include degradation tags appropriate to the organism (i.e., with different degradation rates). Examples of Tail domain include |
| + | #*Stop codon | ||
| + | #*A degradation tag followed by a stop codon | ||
| + | #*An affinity tag followed by a stop codon | ||
Thus protein coding sequences can, in some sense, be thought of as a composite part of three or more protein domains. Most protein coding sequences available from the Registry consist of a particularly simple Head domain (the start codon), a single internal domain, and a simple Tail domain (the stop codon). However, we envision that more and more iGEM teams and labs will design Head, Internal, Special Internal and Tail protein domains and assemble them in different combinations. | Thus protein coding sequences can, in some sense, be thought of as a composite part of three or more protein domains. Most protein coding sequences available from the Registry consist of a particularly simple Head domain (the start codon), a single internal domain, and a simple Tail domain (the stop codon). However, we envision that more and more iGEM teams and labs will design Head, Internal, Special Internal and Tail protein domains and assemble them in different combinations. | ||
Revision as of 03:27, 29 April 2009
Every protein coding sequence in the Registry consists of at least three protein domains, a Head Domain, one or more Internal Domains including Special Internal Domains, and a Tail Domain.
- Head Domain: The Head domain consists of the ribosome binding sites and a start codon followed immediately by zero or more triplets specifiying an N-terminal tag, such as a protein export tag or lipoprotein binding tag. Examples of head domains include
- RBS plus start codon
- RBS, start codon and codons 2-3
- RBS, start codon and signal sequence
- RBS, start codon and affinity tag
- Internal Domains: Protein domains consist of a series of codon triplets coding for an amino acid sequence without a start codon or stop codon. Multiple Domains can be fused.
- Special Internal Domains: Short Domains with specific function may be separately categorized, but obey the same composition rules as normal domains. Examples of special internal domains include
- DNA binding domains
- Dimerization domains
- Kinase domains
- Linkers
- Cleavage sites
- Inteins
- Tail Domain: The C-terminus of a coding region consists of zero or more triplet codons, followed by a pair of TAA stop codons. In the simplest case, the stop codons terrminate the protein with an Stop. More complex Tails may include degradation tags appropriate to the organism (i.e., with different degradation rates). Examples of Tail domain include
- Stop codon
- A degradation tag followed by a stop codon
- An affinity tag followed by a stop codon
Thus protein coding sequences can, in some sense, be thought of as a composite part of three or more protein domains. Most protein coding sequences available from the Registry consist of a particularly simple Head domain (the start codon), a single internal domain, and a simple Tail domain (the stop codon). However, we envision that more and more iGEM teams and labs will design Head, Internal, Special Internal and Tail protein domains and assemble them in different combinations.
Unfortunately, the original BioBrick assembly standard, Assembly standard 10, does not support in-frame assembly of protein domains. (Assembly standard 10 creates an 8 bp scar between adjacent parts.) Therefore, it is recommended that you use an alternate approach to assemble protein domains together to make a protein coding sequence. There are several possible approaches to assembling protein domains including various assembly standards and direct synthesis. Regardless of which standard you choose, we suggest that the resulting protein coding sequence comply with the original BioBrick assembly standard so that your parts can be assembled with most of the parts in the Registry.
If you prefer to specify the RBS as a separate part from the protein coding sequence, then the assembled protein coding sequence should be as follows
GAATTC GCGGCCGC T TCTAG [ATG ... TAA TAA] T ACTAGT A GCGGCCG CTGCAG
If you prefer to specify the RBS together with the protein coding sequence, then the assembled RBS + protein coding sequence should be as follows
GAATTC GCGGCCGC T TCTAGA G [RBS] [ATG ... TAA TAA] T ACTAGT A GCGGCCG CTGCAG
Although most RBSs and Head domains are currently specified as separate parts in the Registry, we are now moving to a new design in which the RBS and Head domain is specified as a single part. The new design has the advantage of encapsulating both ribosome binding and translational initiation within a single part. Our working hypothesis is that the new design will reduce the likelihood of unexpected functional composition problems between the RBS and coding sequence.