LexA based yeast light-swithable promoter system

composite part of Bba_K319003, K801039, BBa_K801011 , Bba_K319003, Bba_K801041, and BBa_K801011

Contribution of OUC-China

Group: iGEM Team OUC-China 2023

Author: Qingyu Wu

Summary: Red light optimization

Due to the fact that the fermentation of MEL-producing sap is thicker, it may cause the red light system to not work well. We therefore used a simulation based on Rombauer's law to model the propagation of light through the sap during fermentation to determine what lighting arrangement scheme we could use to maximize fermentation with minimal energy consumption in order to reduce the expense of subsequent experiments and increase their success.

I = I0 * e^(-αx)

The fermenter we used is a cylinder with a radius of about 5cm and a height of about 20cm. Considering that in the actual fermentation, most of the fermenting bacteria are in the upper layer, and the lower layer is mainly for the products of MEL, after constantly adjusting the number of lamps and visiting positions, we finally determined that 8 bulbs with a light intensity of 80 umol/m^2/nm wrapped around a circle of 2cm and 12cm away from the top will make the upper 2/3 of the fermenter reach a light intensity of 50 umol/m^2/nm.

Background and principles

This system bases on the yeast two-hybrid system which was originally created for exploring protein-protein interactions. One candidate of a potential protein-interaction pair is fused to the DNA-binding domain of a transcription factor and the other candidate to the activation domain of a transcription factor. If the proteins candidates are really physically interacting with each other, this event will starts the transcription of downstream reporter genes, e. g. LacZ or an auxotrophic marker.

Reverse yeast-two hybrid based light-switchable promoter system

This basic principle is utilized in the yeast light-switchable promoter system. But in contrast to yeast-two hybrid, we already know the interaction partners (PhyB and PIF3). The photoconvertible binding of PhyB to PIF3 is used, to recover the physical contiguity of the DNA binding domain and the transcriptional activation domain under defined conditions (red light).

Principle of light-dependent switching of gene-expression.

This light-inducible system contains two proteins, phytochrome B (PhyB) and phytochrome interacting factor 3 (PIF3). PhyB and PIF3 will just form a heterodimer, if PhyB is exposed to red light. Exposition under red light leads to a conformation change of PhyB to its active form (P_fr-form); the P_fr form of PhyB now can bind PIF3. PhyB comprises a light-absorbing chromophore phycocyanobilin, which gives PhyB the ability to undergo a photoconversion to the active P_fr form (red light exposition) or back to its ground-state P_r (far-red light exposition or darkness).

GAL4 based light-switchable promoter system

For more information about the GAL4 based system, please see here: BBa_K801042

LexA based light-switchable-promoter system

In contrast to the GAL4 based light-switchable promoter system there is no need for KO of GAL4/GAL80 genes in yeast with a LexA based light-switchable promoter system. The difference is that we use LexA, a prokaryotic DNA binding protein, for the DNA binding part of our light-switchable promoter system, instead of GAL4DBD. LexA does not interfere with the endogenous yeast metabolism and signalling system because it only recognizes a special prokaryotic DNA sequence, the so-called LexA operator (=LexA binding site). LexA binding sites can be used upstream of a minimal promoter (=TATA box) to be utilized as a cis-acting regulatory element.

In this case the genes, which we want to control by light, have to be cloned downstream of a synthetic promoter containing a minimal promoter, preceded by multiple LexA binding sites, e. g. BBa_K165031.

In distinction from the GAL4 based system there is no necessity for a special strain carrying an GAL4/80 deletion, so theoretically every yeast strain can be used for this system.

Cavity of PCB binding pocket of PhyB, predicted by I-TASSER. The next most homolog protein is illustrated in cyan, the cyanobacterial phytochrome CPH1 [http://www.rcsb.org/pdb/explore.do?structureId=2VEA 2VEA]. The golden ribbon indicates the predicted structure of PhyB. The sulfhydryl group of the Arabidopsis chromophore-binding cysteine residue is co-ordinated with the position of the ethylidene moiety on the chromophore sufficiently closely and in the correct conformation to form the thioether bond by which the chromophore is known to be covalently attached.

References

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15823535 Chen et al., 2005 Chen, M., Tao, Y., Lim, J., Shaw, A., and Chory, J. (2005). Regulation of phytochrome B nuclear localization through light-dependent unmasking of nuclear-localization signals. Curr Biol, 15(7):637–42.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19165330 Kikis et al., 2009 Kikis, E. A., Oka, Y., Hudson, M. E., Nagatani, A., and Quail, P. H. (2009). Residues clustered in the light-sensing knot of phytochrome B are necessary for conformer-specific binding to signaling partner PIF3. PLoS Genet, 5(1):e1000352.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19749742 Levskaya et al., 2009 Levskaya, A., Weiner, O. D., Lim, W. A., and Voigt, C. A. (2009). Spatiotemporal control of cell signalling using a light-switchable protein interaction. Nature, 461(7266):997–1001.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12355112 Mendelsohn, 2002 Mendelsohn, A. R. (2002). An enlightened genetic switch. Nat Biotechnol, 20(10):985–7.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12219076 Shimizu-Sato et al., 2002 Shimizu-Sato, S., Huq, E., Tepperman, J. M., and Quail, P. H. (2002). A light-switchable gene promoter system. Nat Biotechnol, 20(10):1041–4.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15486100 Khanna et al., 2004 Khanna, R., Huq, E., Kikis, E. A., Al-Sady, B., Lanzatella, C., and Quail, P. H. (2004). A novel molecular recognition motif necessary for targeting photoactivated phytochrome signaling to specific basic helix-loop-helix transcription factors. Plant Cell, 16(11):3033–44.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11553807 Gambetta and Lagarias, 2001 Gambetta, G. A. and Lagarias, J. C. (2001). Genetic engineering of phytochrome biosynthesis in bacteria. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 98(19):10566–71.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10466729 Ni et al., 1999 Ni, M., Tepperman, J. M., and Quail, P. H. (1999). Binding of phytochrome B to its nuclear signalling partner PIF3 is reversibly induced by light. Nature, 400(6746):781–4.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12734586 Van Criekinge and Beyaert, 1999 Van Criekinge, W. and Beyaert, R. (1999). Yeast two-hybrid: State of the art. Biol Proced Online, 2:1–38.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/3891738 Wertman and Mount, 1985 Wertman, K. F. and Mount, D. W. (1985). Nucleotide sequence binding specificity of the LexA repressor of Escherichia coli K-12. J Bacteriol, 163(1):376–84.

Sequence and Features

Assembly Compatibility: