Part:BBa_K1497024
GBD-Domain
The GBD domain and its ligand (BBa_K771106) are suitable tools for protein colocalizaion. Initially, the domain was a part of the N-WASP protein (GTPase binding domain) in Rattus rattus. The GBD domain is used as a binding unit of the so-called protein scaffold published by Dueber et al. in 2012. The scaffold (BBa_K1497033) is composed of different binding units, which enable the assembly of multiple target proteins. This BioBrick adds a BglII and BamHI restriction site in front of and behind the previously constructed domain sequence (BBa_K771105). Now, different binding units of the scaffold protein can be fused together without the introduction of restriction sites. This allows the easy construction of BioBricks of different permutations of the scaffold protein domains. |
Figure 1 Crystal structure of the GBD domain from the N-WASP protein (red) of Rattus rattus binding the small molecule Wiskostatin (1-(3,6-Dibromo-carbazol-9-yl)-3-dimethylamino-propan-2-ol). The GBD domain is locked by Wiskostatin in its autoinhibited binding conformation (Peterson et al. 2004). PDB entry 1T84. |
- 10COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[10]
- 12COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[12]
- 21COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[21]
- 23COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[23]
- 25COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[25]
- 1000COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[1000]
References
Dueber, John E.; Wu, Gabriel C.; Malmirchegini, G. Reza; Moon, Tae Seok; Petzold, Christopher J.; Ullal, Adeeti V. et al. (2009): Synthetic protein scaffolds provide modular control over metabolic flux. In Nat. Biotechnol. 27 (8), pp. 753–759. DOI: 10.1038/nbt.1557.
Kim, A. S.; Kakalis, L. T.; Abdul-Manan, N.; Liu, G. A.; Rosen, M. K. (2000): Autoinhibition and activation mechanisms of the Wiskott-Aldrich syndrome protein. In Nature 404 (6774), pp. 151–158. DOI: 10.1038/35004513.
Peterson, Jeffrey R.; Bickford, Lincoln C.; Morgan, David; Kim, Annette S.; Ouerfelli, Ouathek; Kirschner, Marc W.; Rosen, Michael K. (2004): Chemical inhibition of N-WASP by stabilization of a native autoinhibited conformation. In Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 11 (8), pp. 747–755. DOI: 10.1038/nsmb796.
None |