Difference between revisions of "Part:BBa K1041000"
(→BLAST Analysis) |
|||
Line 44: | Line 44: | ||
===BLAST Analysis=== | ===BLAST Analysis=== | ||
The data we recieved back from the sequencing company was aligned using BLAST with the expected DNA sequence ''fig.2'' | The data we recieved back from the sequencing company was aligned using BLAST with the expected DNA sequence ''fig.2'' | ||
+ | [[image:3a Fwd.JPG|600px]] |
Revision as of 10:52, 18 September 2013
RFP Coding Device
Team NRP-UEA_Norwich 2013 added an NdeI restriction site at the start of the RFP coding region of BBa_J04450 using mutagenesis. This was to allow either the promoter region or RFP gene to be excised and exchanged for a different promoter or gene and provide restriction sites for further cloning such as part Bba_K1041002.
Sequence and Features
- 10COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[10]
- 12COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[12]
- 21COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[21]
- 23COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[23]
- 25INCOMPATIBLE WITH RFC[25]Illegal AgeI site found at 781
Illegal AgeI site found at 893 - 1000COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[1000]
Composite part of the following BioBricks:
- BBa_R0010: Promoter (lacI regulated)
- BBa_B0034: RBS (Elowitz 1999)
- BBa_E1010: Red Fluorescent Protein from Discosoma striata
- BBa_B0015: Double Terminator
Characterisation
Characterisation of this biobrick involved comparisons with the original Bba_J04450 biobrick by performing transformations, restriction digests and BLAST analysis. We also had our biobrick sequenced.
Transformation
Parts BBa_K1041000 and BBa_J04450 were transformed into Alpha-Select competent E.Coli cells and plated onto LB Agar plates which contained the antibiotic ampicillin. Both plates have colonies that appear red under natural light fig.1. Therefore the addition of a NdeI site has not effected the ability for the RFP gene to be transcribed.
Sequencing
The biobrick was sent off to a company for sequencing.
BLAST Analysis
The data we recieved back from the sequencing company was aligned using BLAST with the expected DNA sequence fig.2