Difference between revisions of "Part:BBa K1041000"

(Characterisation)
(Characterisation)
Line 38: Line 38:
 
<br>
 
<br>
 
<br>
 
<br>
 
+
<br>
 +
<br>
 
===BLAST Analysis===
 
===BLAST Analysis===
 
The data we recieved back from the sequencing company was aligned using BLAST with the expected DNA sequence ''fig.2''
 
The data we recieved back from the sequencing company was aligned using BLAST with the expected DNA sequence ''fig.2''

Revision as of 10:59, 17 September 2013

RFP Coding Device

Team NRP-UEA (2013) used mutagenesis to add a Nde1 site at the start of the RFP coding region of the biobrick BBa_J04450. This enables a restriction digest with Nde1 to be performed allowing the RFP coding region to be excised from the plasmid.

Sequence and Features


Assembly Compatibility:
  • 10
    COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[10]
  • 12
    COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[12]
  • 21
    COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[21]
  • 23
    COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[23]
  • 25
    INCOMPATIBLE WITH RFC[25]
    Illegal AgeI site found at 781
    Illegal AgeI site found at 893
  • 1000
    COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[1000]

Composite part of the following BioBricks:

LacI
R0010

B0034
mRFP1
E1010

B0015

Characterisation

Characterisation of this biobrick involved comparisons with the original Bba_J04450 biobrick by performing transformations, restriction digests and BLAST analysis. We also had our biobrick sequenced.

Transformation

Parts BBa_K1041000 and BBa_J04450 were transformed into Alpha-Select competent E.Coli cells and plated onto LB Agar plates which contained the antibiotic ampicillin. Both plates have colonies that appear red under natural light fig.1. Therefore the addition of a NdeI site has not effected the ability for the RFP gene to be transcribed.

Fig 1: Plates containing (left) BBa_K1041000 and (right) BBa_J04450 visualized under non-UV lightbox


Sequencing

The biobrick was sent off to a company for sequencing.

K1041000 sequencing data part 1
K1041000 sequencing data part 2
K1041000 sequencing data part 3






BLAST Analysis

The data we recieved back from the sequencing company was aligned using BLAST with the expected DNA sequence fig.2