![](https://parts.igem.org/images/partbypart/icon_coding.png)
Part:BBa_K1716001
GP35 recombinase optimized for expression in B. subtilis
![](https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2015/9/91/DTU-Denmark_Magecycle.png)
Conclusion: We suggest that you use Lambda Beta (BBa_K1716000) for recombineering in E. coli and B. subtilis.
Results
Total number of CFUs | Number of colonies on antibiotic plates | Recombineering frequency | |
---|---|---|---|
ΔmutS::beta-neoR | 52 | 7 | 0.13 |
ΔmutS::GP35-neoR | 100 | 1 | 0.01 |
Table 1. shows the data for the MAGE comparing efficiencies between GP35 and Lambda Beta.
Discussion and Conclusion
Recombineering efficiencies were higher, when Lambda Beta was used as recombinase than GP35. Previously, the opposite was concluded by Sun et al. that GP35. They used long ssDNA oligo of >1,000 nucleotides, which were generated by PCR. We used oligos with an length of around 90 nucleotides. This shows that the length of the optimal oligo depends on recombinase used. For our system, we wish to use Chip-based oligos. For that purpose long oligos are not suitable making lambda beta more applicable for our system. We do notice though that Sun et al. reach very high recombineering efficiencies which may be attributed to the long ssDNA used. B. subtilis has longer Okazaki fragments than E. coli and S. cerevisae.
References
Wang, H. H., Isaacs, F. J., Carr, P. A., Sun, Z. Z., Xu, G., Forest, C. R., & Church, G. M. (2009). Programming cells by multiplex genome engineering and accelerated evolution. Nature, 460(7257), 894–898. doi:10.1038/nature08187 Photo credit go MAGE cycle: Michael Schantz Klausen Sun, Z., Deng, A., Hu, T., Wu, J., Sun, Q., Bai, H., … Wen, T. (2015). A high-efficiency recombineering system with PCR-based ssDNA in Bacillus subtilis mediated by the native phage recombinase GP35. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, 99(12), 5151–5162. doi:10.1007/s00253-015-6485-5
Sequence and Features
- 10COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[10]
- 12COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[12]
- 21COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[21]
- 23COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[23]
- 25COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[25]
- 1000COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[1000]
None |