Designed by: Johanna Opgenoorth Group: iGEM19_Bielefeld-CeBiTec (2019-10-15)
Proline-glycine-peptide fused to the n-terminus of mCherry
A shot proline-glycine- peptide was fused to the N-terminus of mCherry to investigate the uptake of the fusion protein by A. niger.
To investigate processes of endocytosis we fused several S. cerevisiae specific ligands as well as a short proline-glycine-peptide to mCherry. Those fusion proteins enable visualization of the ligand in- and outside the cell. To investigate endocytosis in A. niger we used a virus-like approach by hijacking a proline-transporter to get the peptide into the target cell.
Pro_mCherry was characterized together with the three other fusion-proteins Mat_mCherry (BBa_K2926049), Flo_mCherry (BBa_K2926050) and Opy_mCherry (BBa_K2926051).
Sequence and Features
Sequence was validated by Sanger sequencing.
Assembly Compatibility:
10
COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[10]
12
COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[12]
21
COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[21]
23
COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[23]
25
COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[25]
1000
COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[1000]
Protein purification
First, the marker protein mCherry (BBa_J06504) was cloned into the expression- and purification-vector pTXB1.
To express the desired fusion-proteins the coding sequence of the specific ligands containing a short C-terminal
glycine-serine-linker was successfully cloned into the vector pTXB1 coding for mCherry which resulted in four
different pTXB1-constructs coding for the fusion-proteins Mat_mCherry, Flo_mCherry and Opy_mCherry. Those
fusion-proteins were expressed in E. coli ER2566. The expression was easily detectable, as it was indicated
by the red colour of the culture (Fig. 1 and 2).
The expression cultures showed different intensities of red which indicated varying levels of expression or a
different fluorescence intensity of the expressed proteins.
After cultivation we compared two different protocols for lysis of the cells. Lysis via Ribolyzer resulted in a
much lower yield than lysis via French Press (Fig. 3).
Purification of the fusion-proteins was performed using the IMPACT-Kit from NEB. The protein of interest had been
C-teminally fused to an intein tag that contains a chitin-binding domain. The resulting protein was loaded onto a
chitin column (Fig. 4) and washed with a buffer with a high salt concentration.
To cleave the protein of interest from the column it was incubated with DTT for 20-24 hours. After purification
the different fusion proteins were analyzed on a SDS-PAGE (Fig. 5).
The SDS-PAGE and a subsequent Bradford assay showed that we were able to purify Mat_mCherry with a molecular weight of 28.7 kDa and a yield of 2.35 mg,
Opy_mCherry with a molecular weight of 31 kDa and a yield of 1.48 mg, Flo_mCherry with a molecular weight of 48.3 kDa and
a yield of 40.9 µg and Pro_mCherry with a molecular weight of 27.7 kDa and a yield of 67.9 µg.
To further analyze the expressed fusion-proteins and compare them to the expected protein sequence the marked bands were excised from the SDS-PAGE, washed,
digested with trypsine and analyzed in a MALDI-TOF MS (Fig. 6).
The generated mass spectra and mass lists were evaluated using the software BioTools. To compare the experimentally determined
data to the theoretical protein sequence we performed an in silico trypsine-digestion of the expected protein sequence and
compared the generated mass spectrum and mass list to the measured ones. We were able to match all four investigated fusion-proteins
with the theoretically determined spectra.
Protein characterization
A very important property of the fusion-proteins is the ability to fluoresce independently from the fusion at the
N-terminus. To verify this we measured the fluorescence- and absorbance spectra of all four fusion-proteins (Fig. 7).
All four fluorescence spectra look very similar. The absorbance spectra of all four fusion proteins are matching
each other very well, too. Overall, the fluorescence- and absorbance-spectra of the fusion-proteins
are very similar to the ones measured for mCherry (Fig. 8).
To further characterize the fluorescence properties of the purified proteins we diluted the proteins and compared
the fluorescence intensity to the one of mCherry standardized to the fluorescence of 0.5 µM Texas Red (Fig. 9)
As a result we observed, that Pro_mCherry showed the highest fluorescence intensity followed by Flo_mCherry, Mat_mCherry and
Opy_mCherry. Compared to mCherry the fluorescence intensity of the fusion-proteins has been lowered (Fig. 10).
The fluorescence intensity of 1 µmol Flo mCherry equals the fluorescence of 0.49 µmol Texas Red, the fluorescence
intensity of 1 µmol Mat_mCherry equals the intensity of 0.47 µmol Texas Red, the fluorescence intensity of 1 µmol
Opy_mCherry equals the intensity of 0.41 µmol Texas Red and the fluorescence intensity of Pro_mCherry equals the
fluorescence intensity of 0.54 µmol Texas Red.
Endocytosis assays
Fluorescence in the supernatant
With the purified proteins we performed an endocytosis-assay (Fig. 10). S. cerevisiae was incubated over an hour with
1 µM fusion-protein. Every 15 minutes the fluorescence intensity in the supernatant was determined using a plate reader (Fig. 11).
The results show that the fluorescence intensity of Mat_mCherry, Opy_mCherry and mCherry proteins in the supernatant decreases over the time.
This indicates, that Opy_mCherry, Mat_mCherry and even mCherry alone seem to interact with S. cerevisiae and might even be taken up
by the cell but the specific ligands seem to enhance endocytosis as the faster decrease in media-fluorescence shows.
In contrast, the fluorescence intensity of Flo_mCherry in the supernatant did not decrease which led us to the conclusion
that it is not taken up by the cell.
The same assay performed for S. cerevisiae was carried out for A. niger to verify the uptake of Pro_mCherry into the cells.
Additionally, to investigate the specificity of the tested ligands, A. niger was also incubated with the S. cerevisiae-specific
Mat_mCherry (Fig. 12).
Because of the lower growth rate of A. niger compared to S. cerevisiae only one sample after 60 minutes was taken.
The results show that neither mCherry nor Mat_mCherry was taken up by A. niger. In contrast Pro_mCherry was able to infiltrate
A. niger successfully.
Our results indicate that it is possible to find target-specific ligands that selectively enhance endocytosis in the aimed cell while
other organisms do not even interact with them.
</div>
Fluorescence microscopy
As a second proof that our ligands are specifically enhancing endocytosis in their target, we used fluorescence
microscopy (Fig. 13) to show the uptake of the fusion proteins by S. cerevisiae (Fig. 14).
It could be observed that Mat_mCherry (upper right) and Opy_mCherry (lower left) were detectable within the cells. Mat_mCherry was taken up with a
slightly higher efficiency than Opy_mCherry (data not shown). In contrast Flo_mCherry (lower right) seemed to form precipitates outside the cells while the
negative control mCherry without any fusion has not been taken up by S. cerevisiae.
To conclude, we can say that our selected ligands mating factor alpha and the cysteine-rich domain of Opy2 as well as a short proline-peptide
were able to enhance endocytosis in the targeted cells. We also showed that Mat_mCherry is target-specific for S. cerevisiae so all in all were able to proof our concept. It is possible to enter selected target cells via cell-specific ligands.
References
Tatebayashi, Kazuo; Yamamoto, Katsuyoshi; Nagoya, Miho; Takayama, Tomomi; Nishimura, Akiko; Sakurai, Megumi et al. (2015): Osmosensing and scaffolding functions of the oligomeric four-transmembrane domain osmosensor Sho1. In: Nature Communications 6.