Difference between revisions of "Part:BBa B0032"

Line 7: Line 7:
 
<!-- Add more about the biology of this part here
 
<!-- Add more about the biology of this part here
 
===Usage and Biology===
 
===Usage and Biology===
 +
== IIT Madras 2016's Characterization ==
 +
[[Image:Nonmodularity_of_B343230.png|400px|right|Characterization of popular BioBrick RBSs]]
 +
 +
== Modelling ==
 +
<p>Global non-modularity towards promoters & protein coding parts and relative strength was estimated for RBSs B0030, B0032, B0034 in our [http://2016.igem.org/Team:IIT-Madras/Model#Modularity_of_RBS_parts modelling]</p>
 +
== Experimentation ==
 +
<p>Biobrick RBSs [https://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K1956022 B0030], [https://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K1956023 B0031], [https://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K1956014 B0032], [https://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K1956015 B0034] were used in our 'Noise in Device' experiment to understand the role of RBS parts in noise.</p>
  
 
<!-- -->
 
<!-- -->

Revision as of 21:41, 16 October 2016

RBS.3 (medium) -- derivative of BBa_0030

Weak1 RBS based on Ron Weiss thesis. Strength is considered relative to BBa_B0030, BBa_B0031, BBa_B0033.


Sequence and Features


Assembly Compatibility:
  • 10
    COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[10]
  • 12
    COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[12]
  • 21
    COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[21]
  • 23
    COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[23]
  • 25
    COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[25]
  • 1000
    COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[1000]

Functional Parameters

biology-NA-
efficiency0.3

(Relative to BBa_B0034)


Team Warsaw 2010's measurement

RBS strength (relative to B0034): 33,96%