RNA

Part:BBa_K3841081

Designed by: Karen Therkelsen   Group: iGEM21_DTU-Denmark   (2021-10-18)


gRNA for CRISPR neutral insertion site 2 in Komagataella phaffii

This part is a CRISPR RNA (crRNA) targeting a neutral region in the genome of Komagataella phaffii ideal for chromosomal integration in this yeast.


Target
The crRNA is complementary to chromosome 2 (position 666229-666248) within the assembled genome of K. phaffii GS115 strain [1] (Accession number FN392320). This part is targeting the same neutral region as the crRNAs BBa_K3385017-BBa_K3385018 , BBa_K3841082.


Usage
Co-transformation with the CRISPR-Cas9 plasmid and a repair oligo will mediate homology directed repair (HDR) [2]. For insertion, flank the expression cassette of interest by homology arms BBa_K3841049 and BBa_K3841050 to aid the HDR. The crRNA should be correctly inserted into a CRISPR-Cas9 plasmid system after a gRNA backbone (we used BBa_K3841003) to induce a double-stranded DNA break. For confidential matters, the CRISPR-Cas9 plasmids sequence cannot be added to the iGEM registry before it has been published. A conceptual map of the CRISPR-Cas9 plasmid system used is seen below.

Conceptual map of CRISPR-Cas9 plasmid system assembled using USER cloning [3]. The crRNA should be placed in front of the gRNA backbone to make the complete sgRNA. The plasmid contains features for being replicated in both bacteria and yeast and appropriate resistance markers. For more information of the assembly of the plasmid, visit href="https://2021.igem.org/Team:DTU-Denmark/Experiments">2021 DTU-Denmark’s experimental page


Functionality
This part has not been experimentally tested. The sgRNA efficiency can be examined using the technique to assess protospacer efficiency (TAPE) [4] in a similar fashion as demonstrated in BBa_K3841016. Highly efficient sgRNA will result in no colonies, while less efficient sgRNA will show a reduced number of colonies as compared to.


References
[1] De Schutter, Kristof, et al. “Genome Sequence of the Recombinant Protein Production Host Pichia Pastoris.” Nature Biotechnology, vol. 27, no. 6, NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP, 2009, pp. 561–66, doi:10.1038/nbt.1544.
[2] Jakociunas, Tadas, et al. “CRISPR/Cas9 Advances Engineering of Microbial Cell Factories.” Metabolic Engineering, vol. 34, Academic Press Inc., 2016, pp. 44–59, doi:10.1016/j.ymben.2015.12.003.
[3] Geu-Flores, Fernando, et al. “USER Fusion: A Rapid and Efficient Method for Simultaneous Fusion and Cloning of Multiple PCR Products.” Nucleic Acids Research, vol. 35, no. 7, OXFORD UNIV PRESS, 2007, p. e55, doi:10.1093/nar/gkm106.
[4] Garcia Vanegas, Katherina, et al. “SWITCH: a Dynamic CRISPR Tool for Genome Engineering and Metabolic Pathway Control for Cell Factory Construction in Saccharomyces Cerevisiae.” Microbial Cell Factories, vol. 16, no. 25, BioMed Central Ltd., 2017, p. 25, doi:10.1186/s12934-017-0632-x.

[edit]
Categories
Parameters
None