Composite
pAND

Part:BBa_K4634013

Designed by: Ng Swee Hong   Group: iGEM23_Tsinghua   (2023-10-06)
Revision as of 12:21, 12 October 2023 by NgSweeHong (Talk | contribs)


Single Plasmid AND GATE

AND GATE is a composite part to process two different signal. For this particular AND GATE, temperature and arabinose signal are detected. After undergo heat-shock treatment, T7ptag is transcribed. But as the T7ptag mRNA consist amber stop codons, it cannot be translated to fully functional protein. Meanwhile, if arabinose is added to the system, SupD tRNA is transcribed. In the presence of SupD, T7ptag mRNA can be translated to a functional T7 RNA polymerase. Hence the mCherry gene controlled by T7 promoter is expressed and fluorescent signal is detectable.

Sequence and Features


Assembly Compatibility:
  • 10
    COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[10]
  • 12
    INCOMPATIBLE WITH RFC[12]
    Illegal NheI site found at 1205
  • 21
    INCOMPATIBLE WITH RFC[21]
    Illegal BglII site found at 2502
    Illegal BamHI site found at 1144
  • 23
    COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[23]
  • 25
    INCOMPATIBLE WITH RFC[25]
    Illegal AgeI site found at 979
    Illegal AgeI site found at 1245
    Illegal AgeI site found at 2261
  • 1000
    INCOMPATIBLE WITH RFC[1000]
    Illegal BsaI site found at 1248
    Illegal SapI site found at 961


Biology and usage

This composite part is an AND gate system constructed in one single plasmid. Initially designed to validate the AsND gate framework in our overall project plan, it ultimately evolved into an adaptable AND gate module with input and output sections that can be tailored to specific requirements. The input signals for this specific system are arabinose and heat-shock, which are detected by ParaBAD and temperature-sensitive promoter PL-PR, respectively. The downstream reporter gene mCherry is expressed only when both signals are present. This AND gate system employs the mechanism of premature translation termination induced by amber stop codons. When one signal (heat shock) is detected, the downstream gene T7ptag is transcribed into mRNA under the control of the corresponding promoter. However, the T7ptag mRNA contains two amber stop codons, rendering it unable to be translated into a functional T7 RNA polymerase. Meanwhile, if the other signal (arabinose) is also detected, the downstream gene supD is expressed into tRNA supD under the control of the corresponding promoter. tRNA supD has a complementary anticodon to the amber stop codon and can recognize the amber stop codon as serine. Hence, functional T7 RNA polymerase is expressed, which can initiate the output expression under the control of the T7 promoter. The logical function of the AND gate is thus achieved.


Fig.1 Schematic diagram of the AND gate
Once input 2 (heat-shock) is detected, PR and PL will be activated and T7ptag will be transcribed. T7ptag is derived from T7 RNA polymerase and contains two amber stop codons. Translation will be terminated earlier at the amber stop codon (UAG) site, so T7ptag mRNA cannot be translated to functional T7 RNA polymerase. However, if input 1 (arabinose) is detected as well, ParaBAD will activate the transcription of tRNA supD which carries a complementary anticodon of amber stop codon and serine. Then T7ptag mRNA can be translated to T7 RNA polymerase, initiating the expression of the output gene (mCherry).

In our construction, PL-PR promoters are positioned upstream of T7ptag while arabinose promoter is located upstream of supD. After detecting a certain concentration of arabinose and undergoing heat-shock, the AND gate system will gradually start the expression of the reporter gene mCherry and fluorescence signal can be detected. The successful construction of this composite parts provides a universal monocistronic plasmid AND gate solution. By standard molecular biology techniques, the promoters at the input end can be replaced with other signal detection promoters, and the reporter gene mCherry at the output end can also be replaced with target output genes.

In the construction process of this AND gate system, we paid special attention to the construction of the terminators. Terminators are often ignored in general plasmid construction because prokaryotes utilize two types of transcription termination mechanisms, one of which does not depend on the presence of a terminator. Generally, when using plasmids to express target proteins, we only consider whether the target protein can be expressed normally, without considering whether other downstream genes may leak. However, in the construction of the AND gate, to avoid significant output leakage or input interference caused by promoter penetration, the construction of the terminators is particularly important. In the construction process of the plasmid AND gate system, we added terminators at proper sites through non-traditional PCR techniques. The three promoters (two for input and one for output) and their corresponding terminators divide the entire composite parts into three sections: input 1, input 2, and output. This construction is also beneficial for the construction of complex output. Within any section, multiple gene serial sequences can be inserted between the promoter and the terminator to achieve different purposes.

Components of the construct

(listed in sequence order)

Input 1

  • Inducible pBad/araC promoter (BBa_I0500): to detect arabinose signal and be activated when arabinose is present.
  • supD( BBa_K4634015): The tRNA with anticodon CUA transporting Serine
  • rrnB T1+T2 terminator ( BBa_K3331007):transcription terminator

Output

    T7 promoter ( BBa_I719005BBa_I719005): promoter interacted with T7 RNA polymerase

  • RBS ( BBa_K4634001): Ribosome binding site
  • mCherry ( BBa_K4839013): reporter gene, excitation wavelength at 587nm and emission wavelength at 612nm.
  • rrnB T1 terminator ( BBa_B0010): transcription termination

Input 2

  • Temperature-sensitive Promoter( BBa_K4634017): to detect heat-shock signal and be activated undergoing heat-shock treatment.
  • T7ptag( BBa_K4634016): coding T7 RNA polymerase and containing two amber stop codons.
  • rrnB T1+T2 terminator( BBa_K3331007): transcription terminator

Cloning strategy and results

The assembly of all parts in the construction of AND gate followed a recombination strategy. In order to reduce the difficulty of assembling many DNA fragments of different sizes, we have divided the entire cloning process into two steps.

First step

All the primers used in the first step is listed in Table.1.

pBV220-T7ptag-i-f and pBV220-T7ptag-i-f are used for amplifying T7ptag from pJC175e(given by Zhang Shuyi Lab). pBV220-T7ptag-v-f and pBV220-T7ptag-v-f are used for linearizing pBV220 vector (bought from Wuhan Miaoling Biotech). Overhangs are designed according to the sequence to construct proper recombination site at both end of the PCR products. Then PCR products were purified and recombined, forming pBV220-T7ptag. By this step, we ligated T7ptag to the downstream of its input promoter- PL-PR.

pBAD-supD-v-f and pBAD-supD-v-r are used to add supD sequence at the downstream of araBAD promoter in pBAD. supD is only 90bp-long, so a 55bp supD sequence was added to each end of the primers, constructing a 20bp long homologous segment at the end. After homologous recombination, a full-length supD was inserted into the target site. To reduce the chance of self-ligation, pBAD-supD-v-f is paired with pBAD-supD-r while pBAD-supD-v-r is paired with pBAD-supD-f. pBAD vector will be amplified by those two pairs of primers separately, producing two DNA segments with part of supD at one end. Then recombination ligation is performed and pBAD-supD is harvested. By this step, we inserted supD between its input promoter-ParaBAD and rrnB terminators presented in pBAD.

pBV220-T7ptag and pBAD-supD were then send for sequencing to ensure accuracy.


Table.1 Primers used in first step cloning.

Second step

All the primers used in the second step is listed in Table 2.

pAND-T7-mCherry-r and pAND-T7-mCherry-f are used to amplify T7 promoter-RBS-mCherry using pBV220-mCherry as vector. T7 promoter-RBS sequence is added to pAND-T7-mCherry-f, after PCR reaction, the product would have the promoter and RBS added.

Then pAND-PL-PR-T7ptag-f and pAND-PL-PR-T7ptag-r are used to amplify TcI-PL-PR-T7ptag from pBV220-T7ptag. pAND-araBAD-supD-f & pBAD-supD-r, pAND-araBAD-supD-r & pBAD-supD-f, two pairs of primers are applied separately to linearized pBAD-supD. We specially designed our primers to amplified rrnB terminators in both PCR reactions. Then four PCR products are purified.

To prevent wrongfully ligation during recombination caused by the extra rrnB terminators, we applied another round of overlap PCR reaction. TcI-PL-PR-T7ptag and the product amplified by pAND-araBAD-supD-f & pBAD-supD-r served as vectors and pAND-T7-mCherry-f & pBAD-supD-r served as primers. After PCR reactions, these two segments are combined into a longer segments.


Table 2. Primers used in second step cloning.

Then In-Fusion system was set up to recombined the three segments. The product was transformed to E.coli DH5α and identified by colony PCR (primers are listed in table 3.). The results show all three monoclonal colony has a single bright band at about 3.4kb(Fig.2). Thus this three monoclonal colony were preliminarily identified. Plasmids were prepared and sent for sequencing for validation.

Hence, pAND was born.


Table 3. Colony PCR primers.

Fig 2. Agarose Gel electrophoresis of Colony PCR product
Colony 1-3 was randomly chosen from the culture plate containing E.coli DH5α transformed with infusion product. One single bright clear band at about 3.4kb was shown in each well indicating that colony 1-3 contains the right recombinants.

Function validation of pAND

We conducted an experiment to verify the function of pAND. Since the working mechanism of the AND gate is related to T7 RNA polymerase, and the commonly used E. coli BL21 strain contains T7 RNA polymerase gene, we eventually chose to use E. coli DH5α for the experiment. After transforming pAND into DH5α, we selected a single colony and cultured it overnight. Then, we inoculated the overnight saturated bacterial solution into fresh LB (Amp) at a ratio of 1:100. After culturing for 3.5 hours, it entered the logarithmic phase and was divided into four groups. After that, induction was carried out, and four different induction conditions were used in the four groups (Fig. 3). Group 1 did not undergo any operations. The second group was only treated with a one-hour 42°C water bath, the third group was only treated with arabinose (final concentration of 10mM) while the fourth group undergo both induction. After the induction, four cultures were placed on a 37°C shaker and cultured at 200rpm for 12 hours. Then, 1 mL of the sample was taken from each group, centrifuged, washed and resuspended with PBS, and the OD600 and mCherry fluorescence signal were measured.

Fig 3. Induction conditions in pAND function verification.

The results were listed in Fig 4. F/OD was used to quantify the expression of mCherry.

Fig 4. Function validation of pAND.
The horizontal axis in the figure shows different induction conditions, where "ara" refers to the addition of 10mM arabinose, and "heat" indicates whether a 1-hour 42°C water bath heat treatment was performed. The vertical axis shows the fluorescence signal divided by OD600 for each group(F/OD), representing the relative expression level of mCherry. All samples were cultured for 12 hours at 37°C and 200rpm after induction. The expression level in the dual induction group reached 7.66 times that of the non-induced group.

The results shows that when two inputs are present, the output show a significantly increase by a fold of 7.66 (compared to negative control group). Meanwhile, dual-input group’s expression is approximately 2.26 and 5.81 times higher than heat-only group and arabinose-only group respectively. So, the results preliminarily verified the function of our single-plasmid AND gate system.

Expression of mCherry overtime

After preliminarily validating the logical functions of pAND, we aimed to track the changes in pAND expression over time. We conducted the following experiments, using DH5alpha as the experimental strain. Following standard procedures, we obtained an overnight saturated culture and then inoculated it into fresh LB at a 1:100 dilution. We cultured it for 3.5 hours until it reached the logarithmic phase. Subsequently, we performed an induction operation, applying a 1-hour 42-degree water bath heat shock and a final concentration of 10 mM arabinose to the experimental group. We then cultured the samples at 37 degrees and 200 rpm, and measured the fluorescence signals and OD600 at 5h, 12h, 16h, and 24h. The F/OD of each sample was calculated, and the data were plotted as the fold change of the experimental group relative to the control group (Fig. 5).

Fig 5. Expression of mCherry overtime.
The horizontal axis in the figure represents the culture time after induction. The vertical axis represents the relative output expression level. The fluorescence signal of each sample is divided by OD600 to obtain the F/OD data, and then the relative output expression level is calculated by dividing the F/OD of the dual induction group by that of the non-induced group. All samples were cultured at 37°C and 200rpm after induction.

From the trendline shown in Fig. 5, we can see that the expression initially increased and then decreased. After 24 hours of culturing, the expression fold was still larger than 1 but was much lower than the earlier results. This might indicate that the AND gate does not maintain an open status after receiving signals for one time.

It was a pity that we did not conduct further experiments on this finding, but this experiment shows the potential that the AND gate can not only implement the Open function but also implement the Close function. In theory, mRNA and tRNA, which are the intermediates in this AND gate, have a high turnover rate that could help with the Close function.

The Close function further proves this AND module to be an outstanding candidate for drug secretion because it can be controlled.

Periodic heat-shock test

After confirming the basic function, we became curious about whether periodic heat shocks could affect the strength of the output signal. In theory, only during heat-shock treatment can T7ptag be transcribed, so every heat-shock treatment should increase the amount of T7ptag mRNA. However, how the increased amount of mRNA will affect the overall output of the AND gate was unclear. To investigate this, we conducted another experiment with different inputs. We performed periodic heat shock experiments with either a 4-hour or 9-hour interval. The control group underwent only the first round of heat shock treatment. Prior to each subsequent round of heat shock, fresh LB broth (without interfering with the arabinose concentration) was added. Every heat-shock treatment involved a 1-hour 42°C water bath. Following the heat shock, the cultures were incubated continuously at 37°C and 200 rpm. One milliliter of each group was extracted after 24 hours, counted from the beginning of the first round of heat shock, centrifuged, washed, and resuspended with PBS, and the OD600 and mCherry fluorescence signal were measured. F/OD was measured and graphed (Fig. 6).

Fig. 6 Expression of mCherry varies with different heat-shock strategy.
The horizontal axis in the figure represents different heat-shock strategy (4h-interval ,9h-interval and one-time heat-shock). The vertical axis represents the relative output expression level. The fluorescence signal of each sample is divided by OD600 to obtain the F/OD data. Then, the relative output expression level is calculated by dividing the F/OD of the double-induced group by that of the uninduced group. All samples are cultured at 37°C and 200rpm for 24h.

The results show that periodic heat shock can indeed increase the expression of the output gene. Meanwhile, a 9-hour interval periodic heat shock worked better than a 4-hour interval periodic heat shock. This may indicate that shorter intervals are not always better, although periodic heat shock did improve expression. It is possible that heat shock interferes with the growth of engineered bacteria, which affects the overall expression.

Different induction conditions

To further understand how inputs affect the output signal, we performed more experiments. We set up additional experimental groups and applied various induction conditions (Fig. 7). We varied the duration of the heat-shock treatment and the final concentration of arabinose. The other procedures were the same as in the previous experiments. Twelve hours after induction, samples were extracted and tested. In this experiment, F/OD was also used as a measurement, but it was normalized to the control group (0 mM arabinose, no heat-shock treatment).

Fig 7 Expression of output varies with different induction condition。
The horizontal axis in the figure shows the duration of the 42°C water bath thermal shock (0, 30, 45, 60 minutes), while the vertical axis shows the final concentration of arabinose in the system (0, 1, 10, 30 mM), with a total of 16 sample groups. After induction, each group was cultured at 37°C and 200rpm for 12 h, followed by the measurement of fluorescence intensity and OD600 to calculate F/OD. The data was standardized relative to the control group with 0mM arabinose and 0min heat-shock. The standardized F/OD values represent the relative output expression level.

Here's the revised paragraph with corrections and explanations for each change:

As we can see from Fig. 7, the AND gate module behaves differently when facing different amounts of output. Overall, when receiving two outputs, the expression of the output is higher.

When the heat-shock duration is controlled, the expression of mCherry increases as the arabinose concentration elevates. When the arabinose concentration is controlled, the expression of mCherry in the 30-minute heat-shock group is higher than in the 45-minute or 60-minute group. This contradicts our expectation, but it could be related to the overall expression rate of engineered bacteria. In our validation of the PL-PR promoter ( BBa_K4634017), the expression increases 86-fold after a 42°C heat shock compared to 37°C. Thus, T7ptag is heavily transcribed under 42°C heat shock. The large accumulation of mRNA and defective protein (caused by premature translation termination) may trigger the engineered bacteria's regulation circuit and reduce gene expression.

Here's the revised paragraph with corrections and explanations for each change:

Overall, the group subjected to a 30-minute heat shock and 30mM arabinose has the highest expression. Another result to be noticed is that the 30-minute heat shock group works better than the 45-minute or 60-minute group, which might indicate that the most effective heat-shock treatment could be of short duration.

The variation in expression amounts gives the AND gate the potential to be regulated by changing the amount of inputs and provides us with insights to design our heat-shock treatment.

References

[1] Anderson JC, Voigt CA, Arkin AP. Environmental signal integration by a modular AND gate. Mol Syst Biol. 2007;3:133. doi: 10.1038/msb4100173. Epub 2007 Aug 14. PMID: 17700541; PMCID: PMC1964800.

[edit]
Categories
Parameters
None