Part:BBa_K4719017
phaCAB operon for polyhydroxybutyrate synthesis in K. xylinus
Sequence and Features
- 10INCOMPATIBLE WITH RFC[10]Illegal SpeI site found at 37
Illegal PstI site found at 824
Illegal PstI site found at 1397 - 12INCOMPATIBLE WITH RFC[12]Illegal NheI site found at 7
Illegal NheI site found at 30
Illegal SpeI site found at 37
Illegal PstI site found at 824
Illegal PstI site found at 1397
Illegal NotI site found at 200 - 21INCOMPATIBLE WITH RFC[21]Illegal BglII site found at 642
Illegal BamHI site found at 3039 - 23INCOMPATIBLE WITH RFC[23]Illegal SpeI site found at 37
Illegal PstI site found at 824
Illegal PstI site found at 1397 - 25INCOMPATIBLE WITH RFC[25]Illegal SpeI site found at 37
Illegal PstI site found at 824
Illegal PstI site found at 1397
Illegal NgoMIV site found at 253
Illegal NgoMIV site found at 368
Illegal NgoMIV site found at 602
Illegal NgoMIV site found at 914
Illegal NgoMIV site found at 1193
Illegal NgoMIV site found at 1606
Illegal NgoMIV site found at 1673
Illegal AgeI site found at 341 - 1000COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[1000]
Introduction
Vilnius Lithuania iGEM 2023 team's goal was to create a universal synthetic biology system in Komagataeibacter xylinus for in vivo bacterial cellulose polymer composition modification. Firstly, we chose to produce a cellulose-chitin polymer that would later be deacetylated, creating bacterial cellulose-chitosan. This polymer is an easily modifiable platform when compared to bacterial cellulose. The enhanced chemical reactivity of bacterial cellulose-chitosan polymer allows for specific functionalizations in the biomedicine field, such as scaffold design. As a second approach, we designed indigo-dyed cellulose that could be used as a green chemistry way to apply cellulose in the textile industry. Lastly, we have achieved a composite of bacterial cellulose and polyhydroxybutyrate (PHB), which is synthesized by K. xylinus.
We produced bacterial cellulose - PHB composite by introducing PHB synthesis operon into K. xylinus BBa_K4719017. The bacteria simultaneously produce both polymers combined into the same material during the purification process.
Usage and Biology
This construct is a polyhydroxybutyrate synthesis operon (phaC, phaA, phaB) producing PHB along with bacterial cellulose in K. xylinus. PHB is stored in bacteria intercellularly while cellulose is secreted outside of the cell. To combine both of these polymers washing procedure at boiling temperatures is required.
Bacterial cellulose-PHB composite is an alternative to petroleum-based plastics. The advantage of this material is enhanced strenght and resistance, accelerated rate of biodegradation [1].
Since polymer production occurs in K. xylinus requires a specific plasmid (pSEVA331-Bb) backbone for successful replication. We choose to use BBa_K1321313 as it was characterized by iGEM14_Imperial team as the most suitable synthetic biology tool for Komagateibacter species. We performed PCR of the plasmid eliminating mRFP to preserve Anderson promoter J23104 BBa_J23104, RBS BBa_B0034 and terminator BBa_B0015. phaC, phaA, phaB was assembled into the backbone by Gibson assembly.
Experimental characterization
Polymer production
Bacterial cellulose and polyhydroxybutyrate composite is synthesized by K. xylinus grown in the Glucose Yeast Extract broth (GYB) while shaking at 180 rpm at 28°C, for 7 days. As a carbon source, we used 2% glucose.
FTIR spectra of bacterial cellulose-polyhydroxybutyrate composite
For verification that the approach of transforming K. xylinus with phaCAB operon produces bacterial cellulose-PHB composite we performed FTIR analysis to identify chemical moieties present in the material. Since PHB is composed of different monomers than cellulose (Figure 1), the spectra are quite different (Figure 2).
Constitutive expression of PHB synthesis genes in K. xylinus
To verify the synthesis of PHB, we supplemented growth media with 2.5µl/ml Nile red A. Nile red A is used to determine the presence of PHB by fluorescence. Colonies containing working constitutive PHB synthesis construct should appear red under UV light.
Chracterization of polymer surface with SEM
To verify bacterial cellulose-PHB composite structural differences from natural bacterial cellulose, we performed scanning electron microscopy (SEM).
Regulated PHB production in K. xylinus
We wanted to regulate the amount of PHB in the bacterial cellulose-polyhydroxybutyrate copolymer therefore, the production of PHB was put under an inducible araC-pBAD promoter. Gene expression of the PHB synthesis construct could be induced after a sufficient amount of bacterial cellulose has grown. For the characterization of this improved part, we selected to test different sugars as carbon sources for K. xylinus as glucose is known to inhibit pBAD promoter [2]. Additionally, varying concentrations of L-arabinose were tested to see if this had an effect on PHB production.
The best conditions for inducible PHB synthesis operon were carbon sources of 1% glucose and 1% sucrose, 1% fructose and 1% sucrose. Since a 6% concentration of L-arabinose did not produce significantly different results we decided to test lower concentrations.
The plate where gene expression was not induced showed that the araC-pBAD promoter is slightly leaky. The optimal conditions to obtain the highest content of PHB after induction were 1% sucrose and 1% glucose as a carbon source, where gene expression was induced with 1% L-arabinose.
References
1. Ding, R. et al. (2021) ‘The facile and controllable synthesis of a bacterial cellulose/polyhydroxybutyrate composite by co-culturing Gluconacetobacter xylinus and Ralstonia eutropha’, Carbohydrate Polymers, 252, p. 117137. doi:10.1016/j.carbpol.2020.117137.
2. Teh, M.Y. et al. (2019) ‘An expanded synthetic biology toolkit for gene expression control in acetobacteraceae’, ACS Synthetic Biology, 8(4), pp. 708–723. doi:10.1021/acssynbio.8b00168.
3. López, J.A. et al. (2012) ‘Biosynthesis of PHB from a new isolated bacillus megaterium strain: Outlook on future developments with endospore forming bacteria’, Biotechnology and Bioprocess Engineering, 17(2), pp. 250–258. doi:10.1007/s12257-011-0448-1.
None |