Part:BBa_K3352001
Φ29 DNA Polymerase with His-Tag and GS linker Sequence
Φ29 DNA Polymerase synthesizes new strands of DNA with strand displacement for any existing DNA strands in front [3] has exonuclease activity from the 3’ to 5’ direction, usually only responsible for the cutting of single stranded nucleic acids but has been shown to be capable of cutting complementary strands as well [3].
Construct Design
We attached a 6x His-Tag upstream of the Φ29 DNA polymerase for purification purposes followed by a GS linker to allow flexibility between tag and Φ29. We then flanked the open reading frame with upstream strong promoter and strong ribosome binding site (RBS) combination (BBa_K880005) and downstream double terminator (BBa_B0015). This entire composite part was gene synthesized by IDT.
Figure 1: Φ29 DNA polymerase with His-Tag and GS linker
Results
Figure 2: Characterization of parts BBa_K3352004, BBa_K3352005, BBa_K3352006 and BBa_K3352007, which shows the phi29 and SplintR plasmids. All four constructs were ordered from Twist or IDT and all conform to a biobrick assembly standard 10 and were digested with Ecor1 and PstI. Parts BBa_K3352004 and BBa_K3352005 were ordered from IDT and had a Kanamycin backbone (pUCIDT KAN) which had a size of 2.7kB. BBa_K3352007 was also ordered from IDT, however, it contained an Ampicillin backbone (pUCIDT AMP) which is also around 2.7kB. BBa_K3352006 was obtained from Twist Bioscience and was cloned into the Ampicillin backbone (pSB1A3).
Characterization
Strong Promoter and Strong RBS
We flanked with an upstream strong promoter and strong ribosome binding site (RBS) combination (BBa_K880005) and downstream double terminator (BBa_B0015). This entire composite part was gene synthesized by IDT.
Protein Expression and Purification
We transformed our designed plasmids into DH5⍺ E. coli cells. We grew overnight cultures and then diluted and grew cells to log phase. We lysed cells with xTractor Lysis Buffer (Takara Bio) and purified our His-tagged proteins using Ni sepharose affinity chromatography. In order to check if our proteins were correct, we used SDS-PAGE [6].
Based on our results, our SplintR ligase and Φ29 polymerase constructs that used a strong promoter and strong RBS combination (BBa_K3352004 and BBa_K3352005) did not express an appreciable amount of protein (Figure 3).
Figure 3: SDS-PAGE results show protein content at different steps of protein purification. A band around 68 kDa in the cell lysate (blue) and the eluate (red), matches our expected HIS-tagged Phi29. However, many other proteins were present in the eluate and in the flowthrough lane (yellow), there was also a similar band when there is not supposed to be one. This prompted us to redesign our constructs.
Improved Design
T7 Promoter and Strong RBS
Seeing that purified Φ29 DNA polymerase is fundamental to the development of our diagnostic test, we attempted to resolve the issue of low protein expression by replacing the strong promoter in our constructs with a T7 promoter and expressing our protein in BL21(DE3) E. coli. BL21(DE3) strains contain the chromosomal gene T7 RNA polymerase, which is regulated by a lac promoter [2]. T7 RNA polymerase has been found to be highly selective and efficient in transcribing only the T7 promoter [1, 2]. Resulting in almost a five-fold faster elongation rate than E. coli RNA Polymerase, T7 would be a much stronger promoter of choice. Thus, by using IPTG during protein expression to activate the lac promoter, and thus the T7 RNA polymerase, of our BL21(DE3) E. coli culture, we would effectively significantly increase the production of our enzymes positioned downstream of our T7 promoter [2, 5]. We obtained the sequence of the T7 promoter (BBa_J65997) from the Parts Registry and used it to replace the strong promoters on our Φ29 DNA polymerase construct. This part was synthesized by Twist Biosciences and IDT.
Protein Expression and Purification
We transformed our newly designed plasmids into BL21(DE3) E. coli cells. We grew overnight cultures and then diluted and grew cells to OD600 0.5. We then induced expression with 0.1 M IPTG and allowed cultures to grow an additional 2 hours. We harvested cells and then lysed them with xTractor Lysis Buffer [6]. We purified our His-tagged proteins using Ni sepharose affinity chromatography. In order to check if our proteins were correct, we used SDS-PAGE. Our results show Φ29 DNA polymerase migrating at the expected sizes of 68.2 kDa.
Figure 4: Our SDS-PAGE results show that E. coli is able to produce Φ29 DNA Polymerase. Bacterial cultures were grown overnight at 37°C, lysed, and prepped for SDS-PAGE. The expected size is listed on the side.
Figure 5: In our improved construct, we induced the T7 Promoter and the SDS-PAGE results showed that our band was expressed strongly.
pET11a T7 Promoter
We also aimed to improve this construct by using pET11a vectors with appropriate BioBrick prefixes and suffixes that fulfill the assembly standard. pET vectors include the T7 promoter, which promotes high level transcription. Utilizing both a T7 promoter, T7 terminator, and an extended UTR sequence around the RBS and before the terminator, we would maximize the protein expression for our enzymes. These composite parts were synthesized by GenScript.
Figure 6:SDS-PAGE results show protein content at different steps of protein purification. A band around 68kDa was not present in the flow-through lane (red) or the wash buffer lanes, which corresponds with our expected His-tagged phi29.
Protein Expression and Purification
Figure 6 : SDS-PAGE results show that phi29 was expressed by E. coli. Bacterial cultures were grown overnight at 37°C, and Diluted to an OD600 of 0.2 and grown to 0.5, where a sample of 1mL was collected. IPTG was then added and the cultures grew for another 4 hours. Another 1mL sample was collected. Both samples were centrifuged and the pellets were resuspended in 1x Sample Buffer. The sample with the IPTG expressed the protein more strongly, which suggests that our protein was present. phi29 was present at about 68.2 kDa.
References
1. Arnaud-Barbe, N. (1998). Transcription of RNA templates by T7 RNA polymerase. Nucleic Acids Research, 26(15), 3550–3554. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/26.15.3550
2. Biolabs, N. E. (n.d.-a). E. coli Expression Strains | NEB. Retrieved October 22, 2020, from https://international.neb.com/products/competent-cells/e-coli-expression-strains/e-coli-expression-strains
3. Biolabs, N. E. (n.d.-b). Phi29 DNA Polymerase | NEB. Retrieved October 20, 2020, from https://international.neb.com/products/m0269-phi29-dna-polymerase
4. Biolabs, N. E. (n.d.-c). SplintR® Ligase | NEB. Retrieved October 20, 2020, from https://international.neb.com/products/m0375-splintr-ligase
5. T7 Promoter System Vectors for Highest Expression Levels in Bacteria. (n.d.). Sigma-Aldrich. Retrieved October 22, 2020, from https://www.sigmaaldrich.com/life-science/molecular-biology/cloning-and-expression/vector-systems/t7-promoter-system.html
6. XTractorTM Buffer & xTractor Buffer Kit User Manual. (n.d.). 10.
Sequence and Features
- 10COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[10]
- 12COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[12]
- 21COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[21]
- 23COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[23]
- 25COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[25]
- 1000INCOMPATIBLE WITH RFC[1000]Illegal BsaI site found at 595
Illegal SapI.rc site found at 993
| None |