Device

Part:BBa_M50101:Experience

Designed by: Daniel Tang   Group: Stanford BIOE44 - S11   (2017-10-19)
Revision as of 23:29, 13 December 2017 by Danieldt (Talk | contribs)


This experience page is provided so that any user may enter their experience using this part.
Please enter how you used this part and how it worked out.

Applications of BBa_M50101

We used the optogenetic transcription factor EL-222 to drive transcription of this construct. We also attached a p2A DasherGFP at the end of this construct to infer transcription/expression activity. Note that the preproinsulin was modified to include a 6xHis Tag.

Cells were transfected with these DNA constructs using Lipofectamine 3000 Reagent, Opti-MEM media, and P3000 (Thermo Fisher). Dual transfections with a maximum of 2μg of total DNA were added to each well at varying ratios of EL222 to C120-Insulin. Controls included single single transfections of EL222, C120-Insulin, GFP positive control (pHela), and a mock transfection. 24 hours post-transfection, fresh DMEM media was added. Effective transfection of pVP-EL222 was confirmed via microscopy. Light stimulation was then initiated for 24 hrs (465 nm, 8W/m^2,20s on-60s off continuous loop). Cells were kept at 37℃ and 5% CO2 during illumination.

We observed strong RFP expression in any cells with EL222 plasmid after only one day post-transfection using 1.5 ug of EL222 in our transfection.

RFPmic1.png RFPmic2.png

RFP expression was retained two days post-transfection, as shown by flow-cytometry data. RFP was observed in dual transfection (blue and purple) and EL-222 only (red) cells but not in c120 only (green) or mock (grey) transfection groups.

RFPdual.png RFPexp.png Y-axis: Normalized Count X-axis: RFP fluorescence

Using lower amounts (> 1 ug) of EL222 in transfection may lead to very low transfection efficiency, although more rigorous testing is required to prove this claim.

User Reviews

UNIQ0b205b55512aab8f-partinfo-00000000-QINU UNIQ0b205b55512aab8f-partinfo-00000001-QINU