Part:BBa_K1475000
Protein containing all amino acids
Protein containing all the essential amino acids in the right ratio, accordig to WHO (see references) and also containing all the non essential amino acids.
Sequence and Features
- 10COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[10]
- 12COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[12]
- 21COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[21]
- 23COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[23]
- 25COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[25]
- 1000COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[1000]
Characterization
The western blot was made on E. coli K12 MG1655 wild-type and E. coli expressing OneProt at different OD measures. In order to detect the protein, we probed the membrane with antibodies specific for the 3xFLAG tag contained in the OneProt sequence.
Western blot showing E. coli wild-type and E. coli expressing OneProt at OD at 0.3, 0.8, 1.8 and an overnight culture. The membrane was exposed for 10 minutes.
Since bonds can be detected after probing with the specific antibodies, OneProt is expressed. However, from this western blot, we cannot see if the protein has been cut, just that it is expressed.
In order to check that we had the protein expressed in its full length, we did a coomassie stain on a SDS-page. Here we also wanted to receive information on the expression of the protein at different growth stages of E. coli. We analyzed samples from early exponential phase (OD600=0.3), late exponential phase (OD600=1.5), stationary phase (OD=2.5) and an overnight culture. As a control, E. coli with an empty vector (PSC1C3) was used.
OneProt has a molecular weight of approximately 53.7 kDa. Unfortunately, there is no clear bond at this length. However, there is a bond at approximately 25 kDa, which is not detected in the control. We cannot conclude what gives rise to the band, but it might be a cellular response to an unfolded protein.
To test how what effect the expression of OneProt have on E. coli we set up a growth experiment measuring OD over time on the growth of E. coli K12 MG1655 WT, odor-free E. coli YYC912, E. coli K12 expressing OneProt and with an empty vector.
Growth curve illustrating the growth of E. coli K12 MG1655 WT, odor-free E. coli YYC912, E. coli K12 expressing OneProt and with an empty vector.
From the growth curve, it is shown that the expression of OneProt stresses the metabolism a lot compared to the E. coli K12 wild-type. In addition to this, the metabolism of YYC912 is also quite stressed compared to the K12 wild-type. Despite the stressed metabolism of the two strains, the expression of OneProt increases over time as does the growth of YYC912.
Comparing the growth curve of E. coli K12 expressing OneProt, TetR(+LVA), TetR(no LVA) and odor-free E. coli YYC912 it is seen that the metabolism of E. coli expressing OneProt and TetR is stressed compared to the wild-type which means that it might be difficult to have OneProt expressed in high amounts controlled by pTet (+/-LVA). It is, however, shown that the cells are growing in despite of their stressed metabolism and 8+it is possible that the expression of OneProt can be controlled by pTet controlled by TetR although the TetR(+LVA) seems more favorable. It can also be seen that the growth of E. coli YYC912 is comprised compared to the K12 wild-type which also contributes to possible difficulties in expressing OneProt in the odor-free YYC912 strain. However, the possibility still exists.
Growth curves showing E. coli K12 expressing OneProt, TetR(+LVA), TetR(no LVA), wild-type and odor-free E. coli YYC912
Because OneProt is self-designed, we wanted to test if the protein has any toxicity. To do so, we fed Caenorhabditis elegans (C. elegans) with E. coli K12 MG1655 containing an empty vector and a vector expressing OneProt on separate plates. On both plates, 20 C. elegans were tested. Articles recommend using heat chock assay for 7 hours: 1 hour at 35° C followed by 1 hour at 22°C, repeated. [1][2]
After approximately 5 hours still no effects on C. elegans was detectable. Therefore we decided to stress C. elegans a little more, incubating them in 2 hours at 35°C followed by 1 hour at 22°C, repeated. After 7 hours, every C. elegans on both plates were alive. Thus we conclude that the protein has no toxic effect.
| None |