Reporter

Part:BBa_K1041000:Experience

Designed by: NRP UEA   Group: iGEM13_NRP-UEA-Norwich   (2013-08-08)
Revision as of 11:28, 18 September 2013 by Holusac (Talk | contribs) (Sequencing)

This experience page is provided so that any user may enter their experience using this part.
Please enter how you used this part and how it worked out.

Team NRP-UEA_Norwich 2013

Team NRP-UEA_Norwich 2013 added an NdeI restriction site at the start of the RFP coding region of BBa_J04450 using mutagenesis. This was to allow either the promoter region or RFP gene to be excised and exchanged for a different promoter or gene and provide restriction sites for further cloning such as part Bba_K1041002.

Characterisation of this biobrick involved comparisons with the original Bba_J04450 biobrick by performing transformations, restriction digests and BLAST analysis. We also had our biobrick sequenced.

Transformation

Parts BBa_K1041000 and BBa_J04450 were transformed into Alpha-Select competent E.Coli cells and plated onto LB Agar plates which contained the antibiotic ampicillin. Both plates have colonies that appear red under natural light fig.1. Therefore the addition of a NdeI site has not effected the ability for the RFP gene to be transcribed.

Fig 1: Plates containing (left) BBa_K1041000 and (right) BBa_J04450 visualized under non-UV lightbox

Sequencing

The biobrick was sent off to a company for sequencing, Fig 2,3,4.The data we recieved back showed the DNA is of good quality.

Fig. 2:K1041000 sequencing data part 1
Fig. 3:K1041000 sequencing data part 2
Fig. 4:K1041000 sequencing data part 3










BLAST Analysis

The data we recieved back from the sequencing company was aligned using BLAST with the expected DNA sequence fig 5,6

Fig. 5: Forward primer K1041000 sequencing data aligned with the expected DNA sequence
Fig. 6: Reverse primer K1041000 sequencing data aligned with expected DNA sequence

User Reviews

UNIQ3e7acedb27831c13-partinfo-00000000-QINU UNIQ3e7acedb27831c13-partinfo-00000001-QINU