Composite

Part:BBa_K3610031

Designed by: Jonas Sebastian Trottmann   Group: iGEM20_UZurich   (2020-09-27)
Revision as of 16:40, 27 October 2020 by Jtrott (Talk | contribs) (→‎Microscopy)


BAK1 without native signal peptide / YFP

This part can be used for expressing the plant pattern recognition receptor BRI1-associated receptro kinase (BAK1) from Arabidopsis thaliana in S. cerevisiae.

The sequence of the BAK1 protein does not contain the original signal peptide sequence of the receptor (BAK-). Instead it has been replaced by the secretion signal of the alpha-Factor from S. cerevisiae. To make expression of BAK1 visible and to test observe the localization in the cell, the BAK1 coding region has been fused to a yellow fluorescent protein by a 15 amino-acid long linker.

Usage and Biology

BAK1 is a cell surface receptor protein with an intracellular kinase domain and an extracellular ligand binding domain. The receptor is necessary for many functions in the plant like brassinosteroid signalling and it is also a critical player in plant immunity, as BAK1 interacts with many important cell surface receptors which perceive pathogen-associated molecular patterns (PAMPs). One example of these PAMPs is the 22-amino-acid peptide flg22 from flagellin which is recognized by the leucine-rich repeat receptor kinases flagellin-sensitive 2 (FLS2). Upon recognizing the flg22 peptide, FLS2 interacts with BAK1. This interaction drives the immune response of the plant.

In our project, we used this part to test the expression of the whole length receptor in S. cerevisiae, as well as to observe the localization of the protein within the cell. It is important to note that the protein coding domain of this part has its original signal sequence from A. thaliana.


Characterization

Expression of BAK1-/YFP in S. cerevisiae

In a first step we inserted the single fragments making up this part into a plasmid with a gentamycin-3-acetyltransferase gene and transformed E. coli (DH10alpha) with the plasmids for amplification. In the next step we assembled the fragments in a plasmid with a spectinomycin acetyltransferase and amplified the plasmids again in the same E. coli strain. For this step we applied the techniques of Golden Gate Cloning to get the fragments in the right order into the plasmid. The restriction enzyme we chose was BsaI. For expressing this part consisting of YFP and the receptor protein, we initially intended to use promoters of different strength to get more quantitative data. Finally, we got the construct in a plasmid with a truncated version of the ADH1 promoter from S. cerevisiae. For termination, this part has the terminator sequence of the enolase 2 protein from S. cerevisiae. The plasmid also contained the TRP1 gene, which encodes phosphoribosylanthranilate isomerase, an enzyme that catalyzes the third step in tryptophan biosynthesis. This enabled us to use the same plasmid for expression in S. cerevisiae. We prepared a medium containing YNB and free amino acids, without tryptophan. S. cerevisiae cells (AP4) were transfected with the plasmid and then plated on the selective medium.

Microscopy

After successful transformation of S. cerevisiae cells, we checked for expression of the protein under a confocal microscope. If expression of YFP (λEx = 515 nm, λEx = 528 nm) can clearly be observed, it is reasonable to assume that the receptor domain is expressed as well, as the YFP is fused to the receptor protein. Expression of the construct was confirmed. We failed, however, to confirm localization at the cell membrane.

Figure 1: Confocal microscopy of the normal S. cerevisiae cells (control).
Figure 2: Confocal microscopy of S. cerevisiae cells transformed with plasmids containing the BAK1 receptor with the signal peptide of the alpha-Factor from S. cerevisiae fused to YFP. The results imply expression of the construct.

<img src="T--UZurich--image-1.png">

Figure 1: Untransformed S. cerevisiae
A: YFP, B: FM4-64, C: light field, D: merged
Untransformed samples show very little fluorescence in the YFP spectrum

In the first imaging step, localization at the cell periphery could not be observed. As localization at the cell membrane was something we were particularily interested in, we repeated the confocal microscopy step with an additional membrane stain. The cell membrane was stained with fm4-64, which fluoresces strongly after binding to the cell membrane ((λEX = 515nm and λEM = 640nm). The binding of the dye is happening rapidly and it is also reversible. If the time spent between staining and imaging is too long, then the dye will be taken up by the organism and stored in the vacuole. Imaging with a confocal microscope for YFP and the fm4-64 stain shows the spatial overlap of the red fluorescence of the stain and the yellow fluorescence of the protein fused to the receptors.

Figure 3: Untransformed Control,(A) : YFP, (B) : FM4-64, (C): light field. (D): merge.Imaging of untransfected S. cerevisiae cells reveals hardly any fluorescence within the YFP spectrum

Figure 4: BAK- S. cerevisiae: (A) : YFP, (B) : FM4-64, (C) : light field. (D): merge.BAK- shows stronger YFP fluorescence with very little co-localization with FM4-64, indicating that some of it gets trafficked to the PM.

Fluorescence Microscopy suggests that there is some expression of the BAK- construct. In addition to that, we were able to observe some overlap of the yellow fluorescence with the membrane stain. The overlap was not very pronounced, but nevertheless noticable. It appears that the construct does indeed get expressed in S. cerevisiae and that some of the receptor proteins are trafficked to the plasma membrane.

Spectrometry

In addition to analyzing the cells with a microscope, we conducted a fluorescence assay with a plate reader. We conducted this experiment for multiple receptors at the same time. This way we were able to compare the expression levels of differnt versions of the BAK1 receptor. For each receptor we tried to isolate three different biological samples, however, not all cells grew. Ultimately, we only had two samples for the following S. cerevisiae cells: untransformed (Control), transformed with BAK1 ectodomain fused to YFP (eBAK) and the CORE ectodomain fused to YFP (eCORE). For the BAK1 with and without the native signal peptide fused to YFP (BAK+ and BAK-) and the EFR ectodomain fused to YFP (eEFR), we had samples from three different colonies. For each biological replicate, the optical density at absorbance of 600 nm (OD600) and the fluorescence levels were measured three times.

measured OD600 values (OD)
Replicate 1 Replicate 2 Replicate 3
Blank 0,08200000226 0,08200000226 0,08389999717
Control 0,3806000054 0,3747999966 0,4221999943 0,1316999942 0,131400004 0,1176000014
BAK+ 0,4943000078 0,4638999999 0,4514000118 0,5781000257 0,5253999829 0,5799999833 0,2615999877 0,2171999961 0,2011999935
BAK- 1,417099953 1,365499973 1,368899941 0,6305999756 0,5633999705 0,6216999888 0,896600008 0,7882999778 0,8032000065
eBAK 1,009699941 0,8404999971 0,8934999704 0,2653000057 0,2368000001 0,2592999935
eCORE 1,021499991 0,8616999984 0,9178000093 0,826300025 0,6888999939 0,7401999831
eEFR 1,379699945 1,322700024 1,333500028 1,035899997 1,014000058 0,9526000023 0,4860999882 0,3797000051 0,3829999864

The following settings were applied for fluorescence measurements:

Mode: Fluorescence Top Reading
Excitation Wavelength: 485 nm
Emission Wavelength: 535 nm
Excitation Bandwidth: 20 nm
Emission Bandwidth: 25 nm
Temperature: 22.3°C
Fluorescence Top Reading (FTR)
Replicate 1 Replicate 2 Replicate 3
Blank 1297 1282 1322
Control 2684 2474 2634 1852 1792 1750
BAK+ 3038 2813 2760 2836 2493 2788 2084 2072 2067
BAK- 35794 30319 31424 10792 9097 10517 22609 20227 21220
eBAK 26455 19828 21613 6614 5507 6229
eCORE 10709 8382 9339 8957 7062 7735
eEFR 43125 37782 39589 25641 24668 22517 12410 9054 9027

After measurement of the optical density and the fluorescence, the data were blank corrected (the average of the three blank measurements was subtracted from each measurement value).

The average of each of the three (or two) samples was calculated. From these values, the average was taken again.

After this step, we normalized the fluorescent output for OD600 (FTR/OD). The results of these calculations are displayed in the table below.

Control BAK+ BAK- eBAK eCORE eEFR
4185,221063 9731,614266 26067,19254 28118,24739 3712,946478 23379,84399

If we set the values for the Control to 1 (Control = 1), then we get the fluorescence levels relative to the control, which is again diplayed in the table below.

Control eCORE eEFR BAK- BAK+ eBAK
1 0,8871565975 5,586286516 6,228390841 2,325233033 6,718461693


Figure 5: Fluorescence values standardized for OD600 of the different receptors (C=Control). Cells with BAK+ showed only weak fluorescence, while BAK-, eBAK and eEFR showed a strong increase in the fluorescence levels. CORE did not display any increase when compared with untreated S. cerevisiae cells (autofluorescence).

Fluorometric analysis of the sample showed increased fluorescence which suggests that the plasmid containing the part was expressed in S. cerevisiae. These results were also confirmed with fluorescent microscopy. Interestingly, when we compared imaging results of different versions of the BAK1 receptor, the one without the intracellular kinase domain showed a much more distinct ring structure at the cell periphery, indicating that more of the protein gets trafficked to the cell membrane. This was particularily surprising since both parts were fused to the same signal peptide and contain the same transmembrane domain.

Flow Cytometry

It has been important to us to examine a sample with different approaches simultaneously, which is why we were eager to also measure fluorescence intensity by flow cytometry. In a first phase, 100,000 cells were measured from each biological replicate (488/530 FITC channel in a BD FACSCanto II flow cytometer). In the next phase, the biological replicates for each construct were pooled together and 200,000 cells from each sample were measured.

Figure 6: Left: single biological replicates. right: pooled samples. With the exception of the construct with eCORE, cells transfected with our constructs showed considerably higher overall fluorescence intensities than the negative control.

Flow catometry provided further evidence for expression of the construct in S. cerevisiae. Cells transfected with plasmids containing BAK- showed significantly increased fluorescence intensities when examined as single biological replicates, as well as when the replicates were pooled together in one sample.

During our project, expression of the BAK1 receptor without the original signal peptide, fused to YFP was confirmed with three different approaches. We used a fluorometric plate reader, which suggested increased fluorescence intesity and we also got similar results when measuring fluorescence with flow cytometry. In addition to these results, fluorescence imaging also showed slightly increased fluorescence and some co-localiization with the memrbane stain FM4-64.


Sequence and Features


Assembly Compatibility:
  • 10
    INCOMPATIBLE WITH RFC[10]
    Illegal SpeI site found at 1758
    Illegal PstI site found at 848
    Illegal PstI site found at 893
    Illegal PstI site found at 1183
  • 12
    INCOMPATIBLE WITH RFC[12]
    Illegal SpeI site found at 1758
    Illegal PstI site found at 848
    Illegal PstI site found at 893
    Illegal PstI site found at 1183
  • 21
    COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[21]
  • 23
    INCOMPATIBLE WITH RFC[23]
    Illegal SpeI site found at 1758
    Illegal PstI site found at 848
    Illegal PstI site found at 893
    Illegal PstI site found at 1183
  • 25
    INCOMPATIBLE WITH RFC[25]
    Illegal SpeI site found at 1758
    Illegal PstI site found at 848
    Illegal PstI site found at 893
    Illegal PstI site found at 1183
  • 1000
    COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[1000]


References

Chinchilla, Delphine; Zipfel, Cyril; Robatzek, Silke; Kemmerling, Birgit; Nürnberger, Thorsten; Jones, Jonathan D. G. et al. (2007): A flagellin-induced complex of the receptor FLS2 and BAK1 initiates plant defence. In: Nature 448 (7152), S. 497–500. DOI: 10.1038/nature05999.

Macho, Alberto P.; Zipfel, Cyril (2014): Plant PRRs and the Activation of Innate Immune Signaling. In: Molecular Cell 54 (2), S. 263–272. DOI: 10.1016/j.molcel.2014.03.028.

Yan, Liming; Ma, Yuanyuan; Liu, Dan; Wei, Xiaochao; Sun, Yuna; Chen, Xiaoyue et al. (2012): Structural basis for the impact of phosphorylation on the activation of plant receptor-like kinase BAK1. In: Cell Res 22 (8), S. 1304–1308. DOI: 10.1038/cr.2012.74.

Rigal, A., Doyle, S. M., & Robert, S. (2015). Live cell imaging of FM4-64, a tool for tracing the endocytic pathways in Arabidopsis root cells. Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.), 1242, 93–103

[edit]
Categories
Parameters
None