Part:BBa_K1378001

MlrA

Introduction

MlrA is a 28kDa protease found in Sphingomonas sp. which can cleavage microcystins(MCs).

MlrA is one part of the gene cluster responsible for the ability of MC degradation. The cluster includes four ORFs, mlrA, mlrB, mlrC and mlrD, which can hydrolyze MCs and facilitate absorption of the products as carbon source. MlrA is sometimes referred as a metalprotease by inhibitor studies.

MlrA can cleavage the Adda-Arg bond and causes ring opening.(Fig. 1) The first-step linearized product shows much weaker hepatoxin compared with MCs. In the experiment of mouse bioassay, up to 250 mg/kg of linearized MC-LR shows no toxicity to mouse, much higher than 50% lethal dose 50mg/kg of cyclic MC-LR. Furthermore, the linearization also raise the median inhibition concentration to 95nM, around 160 times higher than original 0.6nM. ^[1]

Figure 1. First step of biodegradation of MC-LR. MlrA mediates breaking peptide bond between Adda and Arg, which leads to significant decrease of toxicity.^[1]

Characterization

1. Constructing method for analysis of MC concentration

p-Nitrophenyl phosphate (pNPP) is a widely used non-specific substrate to test protein phosphatase activity and it can be hydrolyzed to p-Nitrophenyl(pNP) with characteristic absorption at 405nm. The measurement of PP1 activity is based on the accumulation of pNP. Considering the microcystin (MC) is the inhibitor of PP1 and MlrA can disrupt MC’s structure to disrupt its inhibitory effect, the MlrA activity can be detected by quantification of absorption at 405nm (Fig. 2). So the concentration of MCs after degradation can be finally measured by absorption spectrophotometry method with all the calibration curves for all the interactions above.

Figure 2. Measurement of MlrA activity. The OD405 indicates the concentration of pNP, and the change of pNP level could reflect the PP1 activity(a). MC can strongly inhibit the PP1 activity(b), and the MlrA can cleave the MC and dampen its toxicity(c).

Firstly a calibration curve of PP1 activity was generated. The concentration of substrate pNP is sufficient overall so the PP1 enzyme is saturated and proportion to the accumulation rate of product pNPP. We could select a proper working concentration of PP1 in the range of nearly linear relationship between PP1 and change rate of 405nm absorption.

Figure 3. Calibration curve of PP1. p-Nitrophenyl Phosphate solution is treated with different concentration of PP1 solutions. Absorbance at 405nm was measured after 80 minutes. The absorbance increases in direct proportion to PP1 concentration between 0.02-0.1 unit/ul.

Based on the premise of linear relationship between product and absorbance, we choose 0.05unit/ul as the working concentration of PP1 and then test the inhibition efficiency of MC-LR. As a result, PP1 activity decreases after the addition of MC-LR and there is a positive correlation between the reduction of absorbance and concentration of MC-LR.

Figure 4. Inhibition efficiency of MC-LR. Working concentration of PP1 is 0.05 unit/ul. Different concentration of MC-LR samples are added to the reaction system. MC-LR shows strong inhibition of PP1 activity and a rapid change of PP1 activity is observed between 10ug/L to 30 ug/L of MC-LR concentration.

2. Verifying the degradation effect of MlrA

To test the degradation efficiency of MlrA expressed by E. coli, MlrA expression plasmid has been constructed and transformed into E. coli strain BL21(DE3) (Fig. 5a). After induction, the bacteria are lysed by lysozyme and incubated with MC solution. Judged by PP1 activity treated by the mixture, the activity in experiment group expressing MlrA is much higher than strain carrying blank vectors, suggesting that MC-LR is degraded (Fig. 5b). Therefore, it could be concluded that MlrA function well in E. coli expression system.

Figure 5. Plasmid construction and results of degradation assays. (a) In our expression plasmid, MlrA is expressed in expression vector pET-21a, while blank vector is used as a negative control. (b) The result shows that MlrA expressed by E. coli has obvious function in degrading MC, which significantly reducing the inhibition effect of MC to PP1.

References

[1] Gehringer, M. M., Milne, P., Lucietto, F., & Downing, T. G. (2005). Comparison of the structure of key variants of microcystin to vasopressin. Environmental toxicology and pharmacology, 19(2), 297-303.

Contribution

Aalto-Helsinki 2016 team has contributed to this part by improving its sequence and characterization. The part number is BBa_K1907002.

SBS_SH_112144 2018 team has improved parts mlrA gene BBa_K1378001 by modifying its sequence, adding 6x His tag, as well as making it a segment of composite parts. Its part number is BBa_K2888010.

Methods:

1. replicating the MlrA DNA through a technology called PCR, Gel Electrophoresis and Extraction of MlrA

2. combining the gene MlrA with plasmids, and transformed the plasmids to DH5-alpha, a strain of E. coli.

3. Senting the extracted plasmid to Sangon, a biotech company, for DNA sequencing after a series of procedures.

4. transforming the plasmid to E. coli BL21(DE3), another type of E-coli characterized in producing protein, to express the targeted protein.

5. purifing the protein MlrA and utilizing HPLC to determine the effectiveness of the protein MlrA.

Results:

By adding the protein that binds to the Ni21-NTA to the affinity column, we were able to collect the liquid that went through. We ran the SDS-Page Gel with thirteen chosen samples to verify the results of the protein purification. It turns out, we successfully purified pET28-mlrA1, indiciating that it can be devoted to degrading MC-LR.

Results:

Protein Purification

As you can see from the picture, we use N-Dodecyl-β-D-maltoside, which is also known as DDM, to transfer the target membrane protein mlrA from the supernatant to the membrane of DDM. Since DDM provides the membrane which mlrA depends on, with the DDM concentration increases, the concentration of the mlrA in the supernatant decreases to zero. That is the last step of protein purification.

After centrifuge the solution, to further purify the protein, we put Ni21-NTA with the supernatant and incubate overnight. The mlrA will be combined with the specific binding sites on Ni21-NTA. Then, using the method of gradient elution, while the amount of imidazole, which is a competitive agent in this step, increases, it will compete with mlrA on the binding sites of the Ni column. Therefore, the mlrA is gradually elated.

Enzyme Function Test

High Performance Liquid Chromatography (HPLC)

To quantify whether MC-LR can be degraded from the samples, we conducted a control variable experiments, and the following are the data we got:

1. By adding the protein that we have designed, and letting it react with the MC-LR, we find that they successfully reacted just as we expected.

2. From the HPLC results, we find that as the ratio of the mlrA we have designed increases, the percentage of the reaction product increases and the amount of MC-LR decreases consequencely. This result successful indicates that the protein mlrA we have designed is able to react with MC-LR and release the product which is 160 times less toxic than MC-LR, as we mentioned in the Background.

</html>

Characterization of MlrA by Cornell University 2019

Assessment of the ability of mlrA to degrade MC-LR in vivo

To test the efficacy of the in vivo mlrA microcystinase activity, we first incorporated it into a composite part (BBa_K2960012) containing a strong constitutive promoter, ribosome binding site, and terminator, in order to ensure strong expression of the enzyme. Using the restriction enzyme digest method, we transformed this sequence in pSB1C3 into NEB DH5α cells.

We then immobilized the engineered strain in approximately 3 millimeter diameter alginate beads [1]. We then placed these beads into a packed-bed bioreactor, through which we passed a solution containing microcystin-LR. Using our novel gold nanoparticle-based colorimetric aptamer detection system (ssDNA aptamer BBa_k2960000), we measured MC-LR concentration of the inflow and outflow based on a standard curve generated from known MC-LR concentrations. To estimate mlrA activity, we compared the difference in MC-LR concentration to that of a control reaction.

Methods

IMMOBILIZATION

1. Culture 40 mL of E.coli.

2. Centrifuge 40 mL of freshly cultured E.coli (Dilute to OD600 = 3.0) and resuspend the pellet in 2 mL of 50 mM phosphate buffer, pH = 7.0. Use 50 mL falcon tubes.

3. Slowly add 40 mg of sodium alginate to the cell suspension. Mix.

4. Add the suspension dropwise into 5% CaCl2 to obtain beads of approximately 3 mm in diameter.

5. Incubate in CaCl2 for 30 minutes at 4°C.

6. Beads can then be refrigerated or held at room temperature.

TESTING

1. Suspend the alginate beads in a 23.5°C water bath.

2. Every 24 hours dissolve some of the beads in 0.1M EDTA.

3. Plate the resulting solution onto LB + CAM (if using pSB1C3 vector) plates and incubate overnight to test for bacterial activity. Presence of colonies on the plates indicated survival of the E. Coli and successful encapsulation. To further test viability, wet cultures of the beads were successfully made by piercing the bead and placing the sample into LB.

Figure 1. Model of packed-bed bioreactor which was used for testing.

Figure 2. Top: Plated solution of dissolved beads resulted in a lawn when incubated overnight at 37°C. Bottom: Pelleted overnight culture of cells (see end of tube) obtained by puncturing 11-day old beads suggests long-term viability of encapsulated cells.

Results

As compared to the control, the outflow from the bioreactor packed with beads containing mlrA has lower relative MC-LR concentration. Relative concentration was determined by normalizing the control absorbance values in the outflow against the test and then using the equation given by the standard curve to calculate corresponding relative concentration.

Figure 3. Relative concentration of MC-LR in outflow from control vs reactor packed with mlrA expressing E. coli encapsulated in alginate beads.

References

1. Dziga, D., Sworzen, M., Wladyka, B., & Wasylewski, M. (2013). Genetically Engineered Bacteria Immobilized in Alginate as an Option of Cyanotoxins Removal. International Journal of Environmental Science and Development, 360–364. https://doi.org/10.7763/IJESD.2013.V4.371

Sequence and Features

Assembly Compatibility:

• 10
  COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[10]
• 12
  COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[12]
• 21
  COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[21]
• 23
  COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[23]
• 25
  INCOMPATIBLE WITH RFC[25]

  Illegal AgeI site found at 244
  Illegal AgeI site found at 373
  
• 1000
  COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[1000]