Part:BBa_K2010000
PETase (PET-degrading enzyme, origin I. sakaiensis)
PETase is the PET(poly(ethylene terephtalate))-degrading enzyme first identified in Ideonella sakaiensis. This sequence is the E. coli K12 optimized DNA sequence for PETase.
This part includes a T7 promoter (BBa_I712074), RBS 34 (BBa_B0034), and PETase fused with a His-tag, for purification.
Showing our protein is inducibly expressed: SDS Page and Western blot
We can validate protein expression further with SDS Page and Western blot visualization. An SDS Page will further confirm by showing that a protein of the correct weight is being expressed. Additionally, a Western blot will show that our histag is functioning. The Western blot is more specific than an SDS Page because only the histagged protein will bind.
Before performing the SDS Page we grew up T7 lysY Iq cells containing a plasmid with PETase under control of the T7 promoter. Cells were induced with 0.4M, 0.1M, or 0M IPTG for either 6 hours or overnight, at either 15 or 30 degrees C. After expression, cells were then lysed according to our ultrasonication protocol, and supernatant and pellet were collected for the SDS Page gel. Supernatant is the soluble fraction of cell lysate, while pellet is the insoluble fraction. After collecting supernatant and pellet, we ran the SDS page, with an additional lysozyme control.
The following image highlights our significant result:
SDS Page shows protein band at correct size for PETase.
The red box shows an overexpressed protein between 20 and 25 kDa. PETase has a weight of 24 kDa, so the band is exactly where we would expect to see PETase. In the control that has not been induced (0M IPTG), we do not observe a band between 20 and 25 kDa. This experiment again demonstrates our system’s inducible control: the blue box shows there is no band in the absence of IPTG.
If you are wondering what the dark band below the PETase band is, it is lysozyme that we used in our cell lysis protocol. Lysozyme was run as a control, which you can see has a dark band in the same location.
For the SDS Page protocol, please refer to our experiments page. (http://2016.igem.org/Team:Harvard_BioDesign/Experiments)
An additional experiment we performed to confirm the presence of PETase was a Western Blot. While the SDS page can show a protein of the proper size is being expressed, a Western allows us to probe the identity of protein itself. To make PETase easily detectable via Western Blot, we designed our constructs (http://2016.igem.org/Team:Harvard_BioDesign/Design) to include a “His tag” which is targeted by a commercially available antibody. By running an SDS-PAGE as described above, we could separate all the proteins in the cell by size. Then we could transfer these proteins to a paper membrane and stain with a the commercially available anti-His antibody. Because our recombinant PETase protein is the only his-tagged protein in the cell, we would expect to see a signal only from the band which contains PETase. See details of this protocol on our experiments page (http://2016.igem.org/Team:Harvard_BioDesign/Experiments).
Here were our results:
Western Blot shows inducible expression of PETase and PETase-sfGFP fusion.
At 30 kD, we see a band which corresponds to the approximate expected size of PETase (28.6 kD). This band is strongest in lane 1, which contains lysate from our PETase construct that is unfused to GFP and induced with IPTG. Additionally, we see a band at 70 kD in lanes 2 and 3, which is the expected size of PETase-sfGFP fusion. Unexpectedly, we also see a PETase-sized band in lanes 2,3, and 4, which should only have a band at 70 kD for the PETase-sfGFP fusion. We hypothesize this is because the PETase GFP fusion is being degraded by proteases because it is so large. We hypothesize the smear we see between 70 kD and 30kD in lane 2 is because of the same phenomenon, such that the PETase-GFP fusion is being chopped into varying length fragments, each which has a histag and therefore shows up on the blot. Finally, we see no signal in lane 5, which was lysate from cells containing the same construct as lane 1, but uninduced. <p> In conclusion, this Western demonstrates that we have inducible control over PETase expression.
Exeter 2019 Characterisation
Purification graphs
Nickle column
enter text here
GF 75
enter text here
Specific Activity
Change in Substrate
Thermal Stability Graphs
Thermal Stability
enter text here
Thermal Stability of Wild Type PETase Vs. BBa_K3039001 (SP1), BBa_K3039002 (SP2) and BBa_K3039003 (PTS)
Improvement of BBa_K2010000 by iGEM19_HK_GTC
While the Wild Type PETase coded by this part has significant activity, it may not be high enough for industrial use. To improve the activity of the wild type, we used site-directed mutagenesis to create double mutants, and the most successful is W159H/S245I, encoded by BBa_K2982004
We analyze the rationale for PETase mutant design from previous studies done on the residue modification of this enzyme. A clear trend in most successful mutation attempts is that an increase in hydrophobicity or a binding site similar to T. fusca cutinase, which is narrower.
The mutation sites locate in substrate binding site, subsite II where three MHET moieties are bound through hydrophobic interaction.
In TfCut2, Histidine 169 residues and Isoleucine 253 are located at the corresponding positions of Trpytophan 159 and Serine 245 in subsite II of IsPETase. The resulting double mutant makes the substrate binding site, substrate II more cutinase-like and increases the hydrophobic property of the enzyme.
Then,we tested the mutant using an enzyme assay with p-nitrophenyl dodecanoate as the substrate. By comparing the optical densities of the reaction mixture with the mutant and the wild type PETase, we can see how the mutation affects activity.
As shown in the data, the W159H/S245I double mutant exhibits a higher rate of percentage increase, and also higher overall increase in optical density at 415nm at all times. This shows that the activity of the mutant is undeniably higher than that of the wild type. This verifies that the mutant is an enhancement of the wild type, and thus, BBa_K2982004 is an improvement of BBa_K2010000.
[1]:Austin, H. P., Allen, M. D., Donohoe, B. S., Rorrer, N. A., Kearns, F. L., Silveira, R. L., . . Beckham, G. T. (2018). Characterization and engineering of a plastic-degrading aromatic polyesterase. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 115(19). doi:10.1073/pnas.1718804115
Sequence and Features| protein |