Part:BBa_K3089036
T7 promoter+mfp5-linker-sfGFP
T7 promoter+mfp5-linker-sfGFP, sfGFP as marker for protein expression
Sequence and Features
- 10INCOMPATIBLE WITH RFC[10]Illegal XbaI site found at 47
- 12COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[12]
- 21INCOMPATIBLE WITH RFC[21]Illegal BamHI site found at 159
- 23INCOMPATIBLE WITH RFC[23]Illegal XbaI site found at 47
- 25INCOMPATIBLE WITH RFC[25]Illegal XbaI site found at 47
- 1000INCOMPATIBLE WITH RFC[1000]Illegal SapI.rc site found at 354
Introduction
This composite part is meant to express csgA-linker-mfp5-linker-sfGFP fusion genes under the T7 promoter. CsgA is an amyloid-like protein encoded on genome of E.coli MG1655 providing cohesive mechanical strength. Mfp5 is mussel foot proteins from Mytilus galloprovincialis responsible for interface adhesion. Compared to T7 promoter+csga-linker-mfp5-linker-His(BBa_K3089021), we have added sfGFP to characterise the expression of the recombinant protein. It is a robustly folded version of GFP, called ‘super folder’ GFP, that folds well even when fused to poorly folded polypeptides (Waldo et al., 2006).
Characterization
Fluorescence analysis
T7 promoter+Mfp5-linker-sfGFP was cloned into pET28b and transformed into E.coli BL21 (DE3).We grew 25-ml cultures of E. coli BL21(DE3) bearing Mfp5-linker-sfGFP in LB medium containing kanamycin (50 mg/ml) overnight. We grew 1000-fold dilutions in 200-μL cultures to ~0.2/0.5/0.8 OD600 nm in a 96-well plate with cover and induced them at 37℃ with 500μM IPTG for 22 h. OD600nm and fluorescence were measured (488-nm excitation, 530-nm emission,10-nm bandpass for GFP) with a Microplate Fluorescence Reader (THERMO Varioskan Flash). Fluorescence was normalized by dividing by the OD600 nm. We continuously monitored the OD600nm and fluorescence of these four strains and plotted the graph for their growth and induced fluorescence. We added IPTG to these strains in different times of their log phase, such as OD600nm=0.2(early), 0.5(medium), 0.8(late). Results were measured by the ratio of fluorescence to OD600nm. Mfp5-sfGFP had a relatively poorer expression compare with sfGFP which was used as control (Figure 2ABC).
None |