Part:BBa_K808026

pNB-Est 13: Esterase PET cleaving enzyme

The pNB-ESterase13 is a mutant derived from pNB-Esterase from Bacillus licheniformis. It showed the highest affinity and activity towards PET.

Usage and Biology

The characterization of pNB-Esterase13 (pNB-Est13) occured in 3 different ways.

Our [http://2012.igem.org/Team:TU_Darmstadt/Labjournal/Simulation Simulation Lab] performed

[http://2012.igem.org/Team:TU_Darmstadt/Modeling_Docking#Docking Docking Simulations]

Our [http://2012.igem.org/Team:TU_Darmstadt/Project/Material_Science Material Science Lab] performed

[http://2012.igem.org/Team:TU_Darmstadt/Labjournal/Material_Science#Surface_analysis_of_polyethylene_terephthalate_with_atomic_force_microscopy_.28AFM.29 Surface analysis of polyethylene terephthalat with atomic force microscopy]

Our [http://2012.igem.org/Team:TU_Darmstadt/Project/Degradation Degradation Lab]

[http://2012.igem.org/Team:TU_Darmstadt/Labjournal/Degradation#Enzyme_Activity_Assays Enzyme activity assay]

Docking Simulation

Figure 1: Homology model of Fusarium solani cutinase, special thanks and regards to our Simulation Lab

We extracted binding energy from the atomic B-factors and the binding constant from the atomic property derived from all our calculations. We used scatter plots with the binding constant and the inhibition constant in order to compare the plasticizer as well as the PET substrate. We compared the binding energies as well as the inhibition constant from the best ranked docking runs.

Here, OET (dimeric state) became our reference substrate, meaning if an additive exhibits a higher inhibition constant it may effect our protein. Otherwise, if a binding energy exhibits a higher level than OET we can conclude that an additive may accumulate on our protein surface. Moreover, we compare the binding as well as the inhibition energies of the additives with itself to identify the strongest binder. Since we know the active site of the Fs. Cutinase and the PnB Est. 13, it will be interesting if a plastizicer may dock there. In order to analyze that, we counted the residues which are involved within every docking simulation. Therefore, we measured the distance of every ligand to its corresponding receptor with an appropriate threshold and thus identified the residues.

For the sake of convenience of this page, please visit our [http://2012.igem.org/Team:TU_Darmstadt/Modeling_Docking#Docking Simulation Lab > Docking Simulation] for further informtion.

Enzyme Activity Assay

pNP-Assay

We used a [http://2012.igem.org/Team:TU_Darmstadt/Protocols/pNP_Assay#pNP-Assay pNP-Assay] in order to describe.

Conditions were set at: T = 34°C and pH = 7.4. The method is simple. The absorption is measured every minute over 30 minutes by an ELISA reader capable of 96 well plates, after addition of enzyme. The released pNP-group has a typical absorption at 405nm wavelength.

The mechanism of pNPB degradation. The release of pNP is measured by the characteristic absorption at 405 nm

Lineweaver-Burk plot of the enzymatic activity of FsC. The kinectics were quantified by measuring the absorbtion at 405 nm over time. 405 nm is the characteristic absorption of pNP, being released due to hydrolytic activity of FsC

K_m and V_max calculation

To find K_m the growth of the first twelve data points were written down in another diagram. The slope of the regression line gave the speed of the hydrolysis for the single substrate concentrations. Now the value of the speed with the associated concentration of substrate were plotted in a Lineweaver-Burk diagram. At the point where the regression line is crossing the x-axis the x-coordinate amounts to -1/K_m. So K_m is about 400µM. To calculate the value of V_max we used the point where the plotted line crosses the y-axis. The associated y-coordinate is 1/V_max. Consequently V_max for 5nM FsC is 0,001467 1/s.

K_cat calculation

The K_cat value is calculated through dividing V_max by the enzyme concentration of 5nM. K_cat counts 0,293395 1/mol*s.

Indicator Assay

For a more visual proof of enzymatic activity we used Monomethyl terephthalate as a substrate and FsC as a catalyst. We used [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bromothymol_blue bromthymol blue] as an indicator. The release of COOH groups, due to hydrolytic degradation by FsC results in a colometric change from green to blue. For a more detailed description please visit our [http://2012.igem.org/Team:TU_Darmstadt/Labjournal/Degradation#Degradation_of_monomethyl_terephthalate_over_time labjournal> Degradation of monomethyl terephthalate]

Principle of degradation of monomethyl terephthalate.

Day1: Degradation of monomethyl terephthalate. Left: with Est13(~0,8µM) Middle: with FSC(~8µM) Right: Negativ sample

Day8: Degradation of monomethyl terephthalate. Left: with Est13(~0,8µM) Middle: with FSC(~8µM) Right: Negativ sample

PET degradation

Principle and conditions

Conditions: Room temperature (~ 22°C) pH = 7.4

Procedure

Round about 1g of PET granulate is added in each two falcon tubes to between 15 and 20 mL water of pH = 7.4 and several drops of bromthymol blue. In one of these falcon tubes Est13 stock solution is added until a concentration of 2,5 µM is reached. For 15 days the solutions are incubated at room temperature. At nine specific days of these the enzymatic solutions and the negative sample are photographed, to control the shift of pH.

Results

In all photos the degradation with Est13 is in the left falcon tube.

Day1:Degradation of PET. Left: With Est13(2,5µM) Right: Negative control

Day15:Degradation of PET. Left: With Est13(2,5µM) Right: Negative control

The photos show a decrease of the pH-value over time in the sample containing Est13. The one without this enzyme remains unchanged. So it is concluded that Est13 degrades PET granulate. Sequence and Features

Assembly Compatibility:

10
COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[10]
12
COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[12]
21
INCOMPATIBLE WITH RFC[21]
Illegal BglII site found at 1071
23
COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[23]
25
INCOMPATIBLE WITH RFC[25]
Illegal AgeI site found at 1142
1000
COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[1000]