Part:BBa_K3570000
GGPP production enhancement in S. cerevisiae
- 10INCOMPATIBLE WITH RFC[10]Illegal XbaI site found at 1015
Illegal PstI site found at 50 - 12INCOMPATIBLE WITH RFC[12]Illegal NheI site found at 683
Illegal NheI site found at 3586
Illegal NheI site found at 4491
Illegal NheI site found at 5834
Illegal PstI site found at 50 - 21INCOMPATIBLE WITH RFC[21]Illegal BglII site found at 1641
Illegal BglII site found at 3716
Illegal BglII site found at 5725
Illegal BglII site found at 5785
Illegal BamHI site found at 3376
Illegal XhoI site found at 705
Illegal XhoI site found at 3415
Illegal XhoI site found at 3547
Illegal XhoI site found at 4366 - 23INCOMPATIBLE WITH RFC[23]Illegal XbaI site found at 1015
Illegal PstI site found at 50 - 25INCOMPATIBLE WITH RFC[25]Illegal XbaI site found at 1015
Illegal PstI site found at 50
Illegal NgoMIV site found at 870 - 1000COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[1000]
Introduction
The ultimate goal of this biobrick is to enhance the mevalonate pathway in S. Cerevisiae to increase the pool of geranylgeranyl pyrophosphate (GGPP). The surplus of GGPP can be used to make S. Cerevisiae produce provitamin A (𝛽-carotene), geraniol or limonene using BBa_K3570001, BBa_K3570002 or BBa_K3570003 biobricks respectively(figure 1).
Design
According to Rabeharindranto et al. 2019, the enhancement of the mevalonate pathway can be achieved by overexpressing the HMG1 and CrtE genes. The construction as it is presented here differs from the publication in the choice of the promoter. We thus created the plasmids containing a truncated version of the HMG1 (tHMG1) gene from S. Cerevisiae and the CrtE gene from X. Dendrorhous as on figure 2.
The HMG1 (3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A) enzyme is considered as a rate-limiting step in the mevalonate pathway. To counteract this, authors [2] amplified it's catalytic domain and named it tHMG1. The overexpression of tHMG1 and CrtE (GGPP synthase) in S. Cerevisiae led to a significant improvement of carotenoid production because the direct precursor GGPP was increased[3].
The choice of a couple of promoters was essential for the optimal functioning of our construct since tHMG1 and CrtE needed to be expressed at a constant level under different conditions (such as carbon source, for example). TDH3 and TEF1 promoters proved themselves to have a non-significant difference in the expression level of the downstream gene, and to be quite versatile under different carbon sources for yeast[4]. TDH3 promoter is a gene-specific promoter from the yeast TDH3 gene[5], in parallel, TEF1 promoter is a gene-specific promoter from the yeast TEF1 gene[6]. The bidirectional TDH3-TEF1 promoter was designed for this construction. The sequence was identified from personal communication with Dr. Gilles Truan.
CYC1 and PGK1 terminators are chosen because of their large usage in yeast biotechnological manipulations[7] and from the personal communication with Dr. Anthony Henras.
DPP1 upstream and downstream homology arms (BBa_K3570006 and BBa_K3570007 are used target a functional yeast integration locus. This will result in homologous recombination within the Diacylglycerol pyrophosphate phosphatase 1 (DPP1) gene and thus integration in into the S. cerevisiae's genome[8]. The sequence was identified from personal communication with Dr. Gilles Truan.
Finally, HIS3 selection marker (BBa_K3570008) is a gene that is commonly used as a selection marker for yeast. Only the cells that have integrated the biobrick (and HIS3 gene in it) would be able to grow without histidine addition in the medium.
Experiments
Refernces
- [1]- Hery Rabeharindranto, Sara Castaño-Cerezo, Thomas Lautier, Luis F. Garcia-Alles, Christian Treitz, Andreas Tholey, Gilles Truan, 2019. Enzyme-fusion strategies for redirecting and improving carotenoid synthesis in S. cerevisiae. Metab Eng Commun. 2019 Jun; 8: e00086.
- [2]- Polakowski, T., Stahl, U., & Lang, C. (1998). Overexpression of a cytosolic hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA reductase leads to squalene accumulation in yeast. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, 49(1), 66–71. https://doi.org/10.1007/s002530051138
- [3]- Verwaal, R., Wang, J., Meijnen, J.-P., Visser, H., Sandmann, G., van den Berg, J. A., & van Ooyen, A. J. J. (2007). High-Level Production of Beta-Carotene in Saccharomyces cerevisiae by Successive Transformation with Carotenogenic Genes from Xanthophyllomyces dendrorhous. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 73(13), 4342–4350. https://doi.org/10.1128/aem.02759-06
- [4]- Peng, B., Williams, T. C., Henry, M., Nielsen, L. K., & Vickers, C. E. (2015). Controlling heterologous gene expression in yeast cell factories on different carbon substrates and across the diauxic shift: a comparison of yeast promoter activities. Microbial Cell Factories, 14(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12934-015-0278-5
- [5]- SGD:S000003424
- [6]- SGD:S000006284^
- [7]- Curran, K. A., Karim, A. S., Gupta, A., & Alper, H. S. (2013). Use of expression-enhancing terminators in Saccharomyces cerevisiae to increase mRNA half-life and improve gene expression control for metabolic engineering applications. Metabolic Engineering, 19, 88–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymben.2013.07.001
- [8]- S. cerevisiae genome, chromosome XVI, Ty4 LTR region. GenBank: CP046096.1
None |