Coding

Part:BBa_K2865001:Design

Designed by: Chuqi Wang   Group: iGEM18_SMMU-China   (2018-09-29)
Revision as of 15:00, 12 October 2018 by WendyCui (Talk | contribs)


AR185-T2A-EGFP, nanobody inhibiting RyR2 phosphorylation


Assembly Compatibility:
  • 10
    COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[10]
  • 12
    COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[12]
  • 21
    COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[21]
  • 23
    COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[23]
  • 25
    INCOMPATIBLE WITH RFC[25]
    Illegal NgoMIV site found at 155
    Illegal NgoMIV site found at 302
  • 1000
    COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[1000]


Design Notes

After utilizing RyR2 to stimulate camels’ immune system and isolating the mRNA coding for heavy-chain antibodies, we got a gene library of camelids-S2808 nanobodies containing several million clones by reverse transcription and polymerase chain reaction. As for the screening techniques we chose phage display, a technique inserting the gene encoding S2808’s nanobody into a phage coat protein gene, causing the phage to "display" the nanobody on its outside while containing the gene for the protein on its inside. We transfected the phages into engineering bacteria and gained amplification products. Followed with multiple rounds of antigen affinity adsorption-elution-amplification, we finally got the S2808’s specific nanobody clones. Camel antibody library construction To construct the camel library, peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) were isolated from a total of 300ml blood sample. Total mRNA was extracted from PBMCs for cDNA synthesis. VHH genes were cloned by nested PCR from cDNA library as described previously. The final PCR products (~ 400bp) were cloned into the phagemid vector pCANTAB5E and transformed into electro-competent E. coli TG1 cells for the preparation of phages. Phage Display and Biopanning Phages displaying the VHH proteins on its surface were prepared as described previously. For biopanning, we coated 96-well plates with RyR2. The phages were added to each well to allow bingding. After 1 hour of incubation at room temperature, the unbound and nonspecifically bound phages were removed using 5 washes. The specifically bound phage was then eluted and used to infect freshly prepared E. coli TG1 cells. After four rounds of panning, 300 randomly picked clones were analyzed for RyR2 binding by phage ELISA. Among these clones, 276 antibody fragments specifically bound to RyR2. One antibody fragment which did not bind to RyR2 was choose as a negative control, termed as VHH-AR117.

ELISA

To obtain antibodies that functionally inhibit of RyR2 phosphorylation, each of the antibody fragments was tested for its effect in an ELSA based RyR2 phosphorylation assay. 4 antibody fragments were potent inhibitors of RyR2 phosphorylation. The complementary determining regions (CDRs) were confirmed by sequence analysis and the result revealed that there was only one unique clone in this panel of antibody fragments, termed as VHH-AR185.

 

Figure 1. Isolation of RyR2-specific nanobody by phage display. (A)Phage-displayed nanobody fragments were selected against RyR2 by four rounds of panning. A gradual increase in phage titers was detected after each round of panning. (B) Polyclonal phage ELISA from the output phage of each round of panning. Control group used BSA as the irrelevant antigen. (C) Heat map generated from ELISA data of purified RyR2 channels which were phosphorylated in the presence of the PKA. (D) Kinetic analysis of AR185 binding to RyR2 was performed by SPR.

 

Fig.2 Workflow of phage display construction and screening (Díez et al. 2015)