The design of docking domains in our experiment. At each set of docking domain, the top was connected with ACP that its upstream joined in the RFC 23 and its downstream joined in the RFC 10. The following came close to KS that the upstream joined in the RFC 10 and the downstream joined in the RFC 23. The following has no linker generally.
Source
Saccharopolyspora erythraea
References
[1]Broadhurst RW, Nietlispach D, Wheatcroft MP, Leadlay PF, Weissman KJ. The structure of docking domains in modular polyketide synthases [J]. Chem Biol, 2003, 10: 723–731.
[2] Worthington, A. S., Hur, G. H., Meier, J. L., Cheng, Q., Moore, B. S.and Burkart, M. D. . Probing the compatibility of type II ketosynthase-carrier protein partners [J]. ChemBioChem, 2008, 9: 2096 –2103
[3]onia JB, Todd WG, Frank EB Kevin AR, Janet LS, and David HS. Structural Basis for Binding Specificity between Subclasses of Modular Polyketide Synthase Docking Domains [J]. ACS Chem Biol, 2009, Vol.4 No.1
[4]Jonathan RW, Sarah SS, Douglas AH, William CB, William HG,David HS and Janet LS. Cyanobacterial Polyketide Synthase Docking Domains:A Tool for Engineering Natural Product Biosynthesis [J]. Chem Biol, 2013, 20:1340–1351.
[5]Tang, Y., Kim, C.-Y., Mathews, I. I., Cane, D. E. and Khosla, C. . The 2.7-angstrom crystal structure of a 194-kDa homodimeric fragment of the 6-deoxyerythronolide B synthase [J]. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2006, 103, 11124 -11129.
