Part:BBa_K525222

S-layer cspB from Corynebacterium halotolerans

S-layers (crystalline bacterial surface layer) are crystal-like layers consisting of multiple protein monomers and can be found in various (archae-)bacteria. They constitute the outermost part of the cell wall. Especially their ability for self-assembly into distinct geometries is of scientific interest. At phase boundaries, in solutions and on a variety of surfaces they form different lattice structures. The geometry and arrangement is determined by the C-terminal self assembly-domain, which is specific for each S-layer protein. The most common lattice geometries are oblique, square and hexagonal. By modifying the characteristics of the S-layer through combination with functional groups and protein domains as well as their defined position and orientation to eachother (determined by the S-layer geometry) it is possible to realize various practical applications ([http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1574-6968.2006.00573.x/full Sleytr et al., 2007]).

Usage and Biology

S-layer proteins can be used as scaffold for nanobiotechnological applications and devices by e.g. fusing the S-layer's self-assembly domain to other functional protein domains. It is possible to coat surfaces and liposomes with S-layers. A big advantage of S-layers: after expressing in E. coli and purification, the nanobiotechnological system is cell-free. This enhances the biological security of a device.

Important parameters

Experiment	Characteristic	Result
Expression (E. coli)	Localisation	Cell membrane
	Compatibility	E. coli KRX
	Induction of expression	L-rhamnose for induction of T7 polymerase
	Specific growth rate (un-/induced)	0.245 h^-1 / 0.109 h^-1
	Doubling time (un-/induced)	2.83 h / 6.33 h

Sequence and Features

Assembly Compatibility:

10
COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[10]
12
COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[12]
21
INCOMPATIBLE WITH RFC[21]
Illegal BglII site found at 1103
Illegal XhoI site found at 559
23
COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[23]
25
INCOMPATIBLE WITH RFC[25]
Illegal NgoMIV site found at 226
Illegal NgoMIV site found at 1315
Illegal AgeI site found at 217
Illegal AgeI site found at 458
Illegal AgeI site found at 505
1000
INCOMPATIBLE WITH RFC[1000]
Illegal BsaI site found at 907
Illegal BsaI.rc site found at 214
Illegal BsaI.rc site found at 592
Illegal BsaI.rc site found at 994

Expression in E. coli

The CspB gen was fused with a monomeric RFP (BBa_E1010) using [http://2011.igem.org/Team:Bielefeld-Germany/Protocols#Gibson_assembly Gibson assembly] for characterization.

The mRFP|CspB fusion protein was overexpressed in E. coli KRX after induction of T7 polymerase by supplementation of 0,1 % L-rhamnose using the [http://2011.igem.org/Team:Bielefeld-Germany/Protocols/Downstream-processing#Expression_of_S-layer_genes_in_E._coli autinduction protocol] from promega.

Figure 1: Growthcurve of E. coli KRX expressing the fusion protein of CspB and mRFP with and without induction. A curve depicting KRX wildtype is shown for comparsion.

Figure 2: RFU to OD₆₀₀ ratio of E. coli KRX expressing the fusion protein of CspB and mRFP with and without induction. A curve depicting KRX wildtype is shown for comparsion.

Identification and localisation

After a cultivation time of 18 h the mRFP|CspB fusion protein has to be localized in E. coli KRX. Therefor a part of the produced biomass was mechanically disrupted and the resulting lysate was wahed with ddH₂O. Then the lysate was treted with ionic, nonionic and zwitterionic detergents to release the CspB|mRFP out of the membranes, if it intigrates. From the other part the periplasm was detached by using a osmotic shock.

The fluorescence in all cultivation fractions plus the fluorescence in the lysis und wash fraction shows that the fusion protein is water soluble and sediment not during centrifugation. Together with the absence of flourescence in the detergent fractions verifies that the fusion protein is not integrated into the cell membrane (fig. 3) and is not present as inclusion body.

In comparison with the mRFP fusion protein of ???, wich has a lipid anchor, a minor relative fluorescence per OD₆₀₀ in all cultivation and detergent fractions was detected (fig. 3). Together with the decreasing RFU/OD₆₀₀ after 14 h of cultivation (fig. 2) indicates this rusult a postive effect of the lipid anchor on the protein stability.

Figure 3: Fluorescence pro OD₆₀₀ progression of the mRFP/CspB (BBa_E1010) fusion protein initiating with the cultivation fractions up to the detergent fractions of the seperate denaturations. Cultivations were carried out in autoinduction medium at 37 ˚C. The cells were mechanically disrupted and the resulting biomass was wahed with ddH₂O and resuspendet in the respective detergent. The used detergent acronyms stand for: SDS = 10 % sodium dodecyl sulfate; UTU = 7 M urea and 3 M thiourea; U = 10 M urea; NLS = 10 % n-lauroyl sarcosine; 2 % CHAPS = 3-[(3-cholamidopropyl)dimethylammonio]-1-propanesulfonate.