Half staple: TetR

The Tetracycline Repressor (tetR) is a bacterial transcriptional regulator that binds the tetO operon. TetR can be readily fused with other DNA-binding proteins to form a functional staple for DNA-DNA proximity. We used this part as a component of our simple staple (BBa_K5237006), and also fused it to mNeonGreen as part of a FRET readout system (BBa_K5237007).

Figure 1: How our part collection can be used to engineer new staples

Next to the well-studied linear DNA sequence, the 3D spatial organization of DNA plays a crucial role in gene regulation, cell fate, disease development and more. However, the tools to precisely manipulate this genomic architecture remain limited, rendering it challenging to explore the full potential of the 3D genome in synthetic biology. We - iGEM Team Heidelberg 2024 - have developed PICasSO, a powerful molecular toolbox based on various DNA-binding proteins to address this issue.

The PICasSO part collection offers a comprehensive, modular platform for precise manipulation and re-programming of DNA-DNA interactions using protein staples in living cells, enabling researchers to recreate natural 3D genomic interactions, such as enhancer hijacking, or to design entirely new spatial architectures for gene regulation. Specifically, the fusion of two DNA binding proteins enables to artifically bring distant genomic loci into proximty. To unlock the system's full potential, we introduce versatile chimeric CRISPR/Cas complexes, connected either on the protein or the guide RNA level. These1 complexes are reffered to as protein- or Cas staples. Beyond its versatility, PICasSO includes robust assay systems to support the engineering, optimization, and testing of new staples, ensuring functionality in vitro and in vivo. We took special care to include parts crucial for testing every step of the cycle (design, build, test, learn) when engineering new parts.

At its heart, the PICasSO part collection consists of three categories.
(i) Our DNA-binding proteins include our finalized enhancer hijacking Cas staple as well as half staples that can be used by scientists to compose entirely new Cas staples in the future. We also include our Simple staples that serve as controls for successful stapling and can be further engineered to create alternative, simpler and more compact staples.
(ii) As functional elements, we list additional parts that enhance the functionality of our Cas and Basic staples. These consist of protease-cleavable peptide linkers and inteins that allow condition-specific, dynamic stapling in vivo. Besides staple functionality, we also include the parts to enable the efficient delivery of PICasSO's constructs with our interkingdom conjugation system.
(iii) As the final category of our collection, we provide parts that support the use of our custom readout systems. These include components of our established FRET-based proximity assay system, enabling users to confirm accurate stapling. Additionally, we offer a complementary, application-oriented testing system for functional readouts via a luciferase reporter, which allows for straightforward experimental simulation of enhancer hijacking in mammalian cells.

The following table gives a comprehensive overview of all parts in our PICasSO toolbox. The highlighted parts showed exceptional performance as described on our iGEM wiki and can serve as a reference. The other parts in the collection are versatile building blocks designed to provide future iGEMers with the flexibility to engineer their own custom Cas staples, enabling further optimization and innovation.

Our part collection includes:

1. Sequence overview

2. Usage and Biology

The tetracycline repressor protein (tetR) is naturally present in gram-negative bacteria and is involved in the resistance mechanism against tetracycline (and derivatives). It tightly controls gene expression of tetA, which encodes an efflux pump responsible for removing tetracycline from the cell. TetR binds selectively to two plaindromic recognition sequences (tetO>1,2) with high affinity. For DNA binding to occur TetR adopts a homodimeric structure and binds with two α-helix-turn-α-helix motifs (HTH) to two tandemly oriented tetO sequences. In the presence of tetracycline, TetR undergoes a conformational change, which prevents it from binding to DNA, therby allowing gene expression (Orth et al. 2000; Kisker et al. 1995).
Due to its robust and highly regulatable DNA-binding properties, TetR has become a widely adopted tool in synthetic biology. Its ease of modification and ability to function in both prokaryotic and eukaryotic systems have made it an essential element in the development of gene regulation systems (Berens & Hillen, 2004).
Because of its well-characterized behavior, TetR was integrated into our design of a modular DNA-stapling system.

3. Assembly and part evolution

TetR was C-terminally fused to create a tetR-mScarlet-I-His₆.

As part of developing a Förster Resonance Energy Transfer (FRET) assay, a modified version of TetR was created. Based on previous studies that succesfully engineered single-chain TetR (scTetR) proteins with unaltered DNA binding, we genetically fused two TetR proteins together with a flexible (G₄S)₆ linker (Krueger et al. 2003; Zhou et al. 2007). Unfortunately, under the T7 promoter system we tested, the expression levels were insufficient for further experimental use. (More information can be found on our Wiki or the tetR-mScarlet-I composite part)

4. Results

4.1 Protein expression and Mobility Shift Assay

The fusion protein was expressed from a T7 based expression plasmid and subsequently purified using metal affinity chromatography with Ni-NTA beads.(Figure 1, left) DNA binding affinity in two different buffer systems was estimated with an electrophoretic mobility shift assay (EMSA) (Binding buffer 1: 137 mM NaCl, 2.7 mM KCl, 10 mM Na2HPO4, 1.8 mM KH2HPO4, 0.1 % (v/v) IGEPAL® CA-360, 1 mM EDTA; Binding buffer 2: 10 mM Tris, 50 mM KCl).

Figure 2: Expression and DNA binding analysis of tetR-mScarlet-I-His₆ fusion protein.
Left image: SDS-PAGE analysis of protein expression. Lane 1: raw lysate of E. coli expression culture after steril-filtration; Lane 2: Flow through of first wash; Lane 3: Flow through of second wash; Lane 4: Elution of purified protein. The expected band size of the protein is 50 737.60 Da, highlighted with a red box on the gel.
Right image: Qualitative electrophoretic mobility shift assay of TetR in two different buffer systems. 1 µM protein and 0.5 µM DNA containing three TetR binding sites were equilibrated in different buffer sytstems (Binding buffer 1: 137 mM NaCl, 2.7 mM KCl, 10 mM Na2HPO4, 1.8 mM KH2HPO4, 0.1 % (v/v) IGEPAL® CA-360, 1 mM EDTA; Binding buffer 2: 10 mM Tris, 50 mM KCl). Bands were visualized by SYBR-safe staining after gel electrophoresis

4.2 In Silico Characterization using DaVinci

We developed the in silico model DaVinci for rapid engineering and development of our PiCasSO system. DaVinci acts as a digital twin to PiCasSO, designed to understand the forces acting on our system, refine experimental parameters, and find optimal connections between protein staples and target DNA. We calibrated DaVinci with literature and our own experimental affinity data calculated from EMSA assays with purified proteins DaVinci is divided into three phases: static structure prediction, all-atom dynamics simulation, and long-ranged DNA dynamics simulation. We applied the first two to our parts, characterizing structure and dynamics of the DNA-binding interaction.
The structures shown in Figure 4 were predicted using the AlphaFold server and the protein-DNA interaction further analyzed with all atom dynamics simulations. The depicted structures show favorable DNA binding, and no apperent problems with the fusion protein and DNA binding were detected.

Figure 4: Representations of the Simple Staple constructs Proteins are shown in full color (top row) and by their predicted structural accuracy during DNA interaction. The linkers were selected based on their structural property providing maximal flexibility. All structures were predicted using the AlphaFold server (Google DeepMind, 2024).

5. References

(Kisker et al., 1995; Krueger et al., 2003; Orth et al., 2000; Zhou et al., 2007)

Kisker, C., Hinrichs, W., Tovar, K., Hillen, W., & Saenger, W. (1995). The Complex Formed Between Tet Repressor and Tetracycline-Mg²⁺ Reveals Mechanism of Antibiotic Resistance. Journal of Molecular Biology, 247(2), 260–280. https://doi.org/10.1006/jmbi.1994.0138

Krueger, C., Berens, C., Schmidt, A., Schnappinger, D., & Hillen, W. (2003). Single-chain Tet transregulators. Nucleic Acids Research, 31(12), 3050–3056.

Orth, P., Schnappinger, D., Hillen, W., Saenger, W., & Hinrichs, W. (2000). Structural basis of gene regulation by the tetracycline inducible Tet repressor-operator system. Nature Structural Biology, 7(3), 215–219. https://doi.org/10.1038/73324

Zhou, X., Symons, J., Hoppes, R., Krueger, C., Berens, C., Hillen, W., Berkhout, B., & Das, A. T. (2007). Improved single-chain transactivators of the Tet-On gene expression system. BMC Biotechnology, 7, 6. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6750-7-6