Difference between revisions of "Part:BBa K3182107"

Line 92: Line 92:
  
 
<h3>Immobilization on a cellulose bandage</h3>
 
<h3>Immobilization on a cellulose bandage</h3>
To show the proof of principle for iGEM19 Linköping's project, the antimicrobial agents were fused to a cellulose bandage (Epiprotect). The cellulose was first incubated with E. coli BL21 (DE3) lysate (20 mL) containing CBD-Pln1 for two hours in 4 degrees Celsius. After immobilization of the agent to cellulose, the bandage was washed three times with CBM-buffer (10 mL), or until no foam can be seen. The foam build-up is because of the lysate also containing 1% Triton X100, which will heavily interfere with the results. After washing, small pieces of bandage was cut out to fit into a well of a 96-well plate. Added to this well was also low salt LB-media (0.4 g/L NaCl) and E. coli BL21 (DE3) at OD600 0. Thrombin cleavage buffer (20 mM Tris-HCl, 150 mM NaCl and 2.5 mM CaCl2) were added to all wells, and thrombin (0.05 U, 0.6 uM) were added to release the agent into the solution. The negative control had both thrombin cleavage buffer and thrombin. In Figure B. the results from this experiment can be seen. Noticeably, the thrombin released agent inhibited the E. coli growth the most of the combinations tested. This further supports
+
To show the proof of principle for iGEM19 Linköping's project, the antimicrobial agents were fused to a cellulose bandage (Epiprotect). The cellulose was first incubated with E. coli BL21 (DE3) lysate (20 mL) containing CBD-Pln1 for two hours in 4 degrees Celsius. After immobilization of the agent to cellulose, the bandage was washed three times with CBM-buffer (10 mL), or until no foam can be seen. The foam build-up is because of the lysate also containing 1% Triton X100, which will heavily interfere with the results. After washing, small pieces of bandage was cut out to fit into a well of a 96-well plate. Added to this well was also low salt LB-media (0.4 g/L NaCl) and E. coli BL21 (DE3) at OD600 0. Thrombin cleavage buffer (20 mM Tris-HCl, 150 mM NaCl and 2.5 mM CaCl2) were added to all wells, and thrombin (0.05 U, 0.6 uM) were added to release the agent into the solution. The negative control had both thrombin cleavage buffer and thrombin. In Figure B. the results from this experiment can be seen. Noticeably, the thrombin released agent inhibited the E. coli growth the most of the combinations tested. This shows that the proof of principle of iGEM19 Linköping's main mechanism is working.
  
 
<!-- Uncomment this to enable Functional Parameter display  
 
<!-- Uncomment this to enable Functional Parameter display  

Revision as of 12:30, 13 October 2019

Sequence and Features


Assembly Compatibility:
  • 10
    COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[10]
  • 12
    COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[12]
  • 21
    INCOMPATIBLE WITH RFC[21]
    Illegal BglII site found at 653
    Illegal BamHI site found at 580
  • 23
    COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[23]
  • 25
    COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[25]
  • 1000
    COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[1000]


Introduction

pT7-CBDcipA-Pln1

Figure 1. Mechanism of action for Novosite. The CBDcipA-fusion is attached to a polysaccaride material. By adding thrombin from any source the fusion protein will be cleaved and the C-terminal fusion protein will be released into the solution. By changing the fusion protein to an antimicrobial peptide/enzyme, and using the material as a bandage, the peptide/enzyme can be released into a wound by native human thrombin.

This part consists of a carbohydrate binding domain (CBD) from Clostridium thermocellum (C. thermocellum) cellulose scaffolding protein (CipA). This binding domain is a central part of Clostridium thermocellum's cellusome and has a strong affinity for cellulose. The CBD was fused to another protein using a flexible GS-linker (-GGGGSGGGGS-)in order to attach this complex to a polysaccaride material. A thrombin cleavage site (-LVPRGS-) was added to the end of the linker and its breakage will leave a glycine and serine attached to the N-terminal of the fusion protein.

Protease site and use

The thrombin site was added to enable the ability to release the fusion protein down into skin wounds. Thanks to our integrated human practice we learned that infections span much deeper into wounds that we thought. Simply attaching the CBD-fusion protein to a carbohydrate material would not enable the fusion protein to reach far into the wound. The thrombin site was also chosen because of thrombin's endogenous existence in humans.

Assembly compabilities

An internal BamHI recognition sequence (RS) has been added to enable interchangeable fusion proteins to the CBD. BamHI was chosen because its RS codes for glycine and serine, fitting it to the end of the thrombin site. It is also a cost-effective enzyme and is unaffected by methylated DNA. BamHI is a part of the RFC21 standard.





CBDcipA crystal structure

Figure 1. Crystal structure of CBDcipA with a resolution of 1.75 Å which were solved by [http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/PMC452321 Tormo et al. 1989]. PDB code 1NBC. In red from the left, W118, R112, D56, H57 and Y67, thought to be the surface which interacts strongly with polysaccarides.

Important molecular faces

CBDcipA is composed of a nine-stranded beta sandwich with a jelly roll topology and binds a calcium ion. It further contains conserved residues exposed on the surface which map into two clear surfaces on each side of the molecule. One of the faces mainly contains planar strips of aromatic and polar residues which may be the carbohydrate binding part. Further aspects are unknown and unique to this CBD such as the other conserved residues which are contained in a groove.

Carbohydrate binding domain specificity

Since the CBD is from the cellusome of C. thermocellum some research labeled it a cellulose binding domain. However, iGEM19 Linköping noticed that this domain could also bind to different sources of polysaccaride materials. This serves as a domain for iGEM19 Linköpings modular bandage, where the polysaccaride material can be exchanged for other/similar materials and not exclusively cellulose.

The choice of carbohydrate binding domain

iGEM Linköping 2019 chose CBDcipA due to the fact that many other iGEM teams had explored the possibilities of this domain. Our basic design was influenced by [http://2014.igem.org/Team:Imperial iGEM14 Imperial], [http://2015.igem.org/Team:edinburgh iGEM15 Edinburgh] and [http://2018.igem.org/Team:ecuador iGEM18 Ecuador]. Purification and where to place the fusion protein (N- or C-terminal) was determined by studying the former projects. CBDcipA also originates from a thermophilic bacteria which further increases the domain's applications.





Expression system

The part has a very strong expression with a T7-RNA-polymerase promotor (BBa_I719005) as well as a 5'-UTR (BBa_K1758100) region which has been shown to further increase expression in E. coli (BBa_K1758106), ([http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2676996 Olins et al. 1989]), ([http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23927491 Takahashi et al. 2013]).

Figure B. Benchling screenshot of the expression system. The T7-RNA-polymerase promotor is followed by a T7 g10 leader sequence which enhances the binding to the 16S ribosomal RNA. After the leader sequence a poly A spacer is found, which has been shown to increase translation in vitro. Before the start codon a strong RBS, g10-L, followed by an AT-rich spacer can be seen, which will slightly increase translation of the following gene.

Antimicrobial Agent - Pln1

Fused to the CBD is a Lactobacillus plantarum antibacterial peptide 1. The peptide is 38 amino acids long and has a secondary structure closely resembling membrane proteins. The function of Pln1 is to inhibit competing bacteria. The AMP has not been studied extensively but is thought to have an α-helical C-terminal and to be amphiphilic. The N-terminus consists probably of a random coil (therefore no stable structure outside the cell membrane) and and has a more hydrophilic nature. With this overlay of Pln1 is has a capability to disrupt membrane bilayers and associate themselves in pore formation inside it, leading to bacterial leakage. Pln1 has better activity to methicillin-resistant S. epidermidis (MRSE), M. luteus and same activity to S. aureus compared to nisin. Therefore, Pln1 in combination with nisin or by replacing it could be a lucrative candidate.

The peptide is designed to battle the Enterococcus faecium, Staphylococcus aureus, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Acinetobacter baumannii, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Enterobacter spp. family of pathogens (ESKAPE). ESKAPE is a family(s) of bacteria which has multiple understrains that has evolved resistance to the most commonly used antibiotics.

Usage and Biology

Expression, purification and protease treatment

The antimicrobial agents which iGEM Linköping used were all expressed the same way. Early expression tests showed great promise but with low concentrations. The early tests were done with standard E. coli expression, cultures were grown to an OD600 of 0.4-1.0 in varying volumes and induced with 0.5 mM IPTG, and let to express the agents for 16 hours in 18 degrees Celsius. Harvest of the cells was done at 3500 rpm for 30 minutes.

Solubization and purification

Figure B (A) CBD-Pln1 purified and cleaved with thrombin run on an SDS-PAGE 4-20 % gel. Lane 1 contains CBD-Pln1 previously bound to cellulose and treated with thrombin, which explains the multiple bands. Lane 2 contains the cleaved Pln1 from lane 1, which was found in the supernatant from the cleavage along with thrombin (not visible). Lane 3 contains a protein ladder called LMW by GE Healthcare. (B) CBD-Pln1 run on an SDS-PAGE 4-20 % gel after purification. Lane 1 contains a protein ladder called Precision Plus Dual color by BioRad. Lane 2 contains purified CBD-Pln1 in fraction 1 after elution with water. Lane 3 contains purified CBD-Pln1 in fraction 2 after elution with water. Lane 4-5 is empty. Lane 6 contains E.coli BL21 (DE3) lysate from induced cells which carries the plasmid expressing CBD-Pln1.

Solubization and purification

After harvest the cells was re-suspended in phosphate buffered saline (PBS) buffer or CBM-buffer and sonicated for 6 minutes, 30 % amplitude and 30 seconds on, 30 seconds off. The soluble fraction was then purified by attaching the CBD-fusion to cellulose. This showed very feint bands on SDS-PAGE analysis. Because of the low yield from the soluble fraction, a detergent (Triton X100, 1%) was used to re-suspend the lipid-soluble proteins (insoluble fraction). In this fraction a much higher protein concentration could be found.

The Triton-X100 1 % fraction was later bound to microcristallin cellulose by Sigma Aldrich. A culture of 1 L E. coli BL21 (DE3) treated as above and lysed in 60 mL CBM-buffer. Half of that amount was then incubated with 5 g of microcristallin cellulose for 2 hours in 4 degrees Celsius. After binding the CBD-fusion protein to the cellulose, washing was done with either 70 % ethanol, PBS or CBM-buffer. Where 10 mL of each solution was added and incubated with the cellulose for 30 minutes. This step was repeated three times to remove unbound proteins. After washing, elution was done with deionized water, 10 mL was sufficient to elute some CBD-fusion proteins (room temperature), while other needed higher temperatures (37 degrees Celsius). This was done in 50 mL tubes under shaking, in hindsight, a column should be used to better track elution.

Thrombin treatment

These bound fractions could also be cleaved with thrombin, where 25 units Bovine Thrombin (100 uL) by Sigma Aldrich was added. To this thrombin cleavage buffer (20 mM Tris-HCl, 150 mM NaCl and 2.5 mM CaCl2) was also added (500 uL) along with deionized water (4.4 mL). The results from this can be seen in Figure X.






Antimicrobial activity in solution

Figure B Uncleaved CBD-Pln1 was tested against an E.coli (DE3) 0 OD culture. Unfilled boxes is a negative control containing 160 uL E.coli (DE3) and 40 uL water. The rest of the samples in the graph represent a dilution series of CBD-Pln1 at the same volumes as the negative control. The media used was low salt LB (0.4 g/L NaCl). The error bars represent the mean ± SD from six technical replicates.

CBD bound agents

An experiment to test the antimicrobial activity of our agents still bound to the CBD was conducted, which can be seen in Figure B. This was done in order to see if the absence of thrombin cleavage would yield inactive agents. The CBD-bound agents were purified like above method mentions. Six technical replicates of E. coli BL21 (DE3)(160 uL in low salt LB-media, 0.4 g/L NaCl) were added to a 96-well plate by Eppendorf. To this 40 uL water was added to function as a negative control. To 6x6 wells a concentration gradient was added in the same way, always adding 160 uL (in low salt LB-media) E.coli BL21 (DE3) and 40 uL of the unbound agents in water, diluted to the concentrations in Figure B. The experiment was run for 16 hours in 37 degrees and before each measurement a quick shake (200 rpm, 10 seconds) was done. The absorbance at 600 nm was measured every hour.

Importance of testing the CBD-bound agents

High amounts of the CBD-bound agent could still inhibit growth of E. coli, meaning if thrombin is not present in the wound the bandage would still yield a antimicrobial effect, this can further be seen in Figure B (plåstertest). This also explains the trouble when expressing the CBD-agents and why they can be found in the insoluble fraction.


Figure BB: Cleaved Pln1 was tested against an E. coli BL21 (DE3) 0 OD culture. Unfilled boxes is a negative control containing thrombin and thrombin cleavage buffer with the same volume as Pln1 (40 uL). Filled boxes is Pln1 at a concentration of 3.1 uM C: Pln1 was added to a B. subtilis 0 OD culture. Unfilled boxes indicate negative control containing thrombin and thrombin cleavage buffer with the same volume as Pln1 (40 uL). The media used was low salt LB (0.4 g/L NaCl). The error bars represent the mean ± SD from three independent experiments.



Unbound agents

As a positive control before starting our experiments with the CBD-agent-bandage, the unbound agents needed to be able to kill bacteria as well. The agents were purified and treated with thrombin as stated before. The experimental setup was the same as the earlier experiment but instead of adding water to the negative control, thrombin (0.5 U, 0.6 uM) and thrombin cleavage buffer (40 uL, 20 mM Tris-HCl, 150 mM NaCl and 2.5 mM CaCl2) was added. This was because the agents had thrombin and cleavage buffer with them. This showed to not affect the bacterial growth, but rather increase it due to the higher salt amounts in the cleavage buffer.








Antimicrobial activity immobilized and released

Figure B. A cellulose bandage (Epiprotect) incubated with E. coli BL21 (DE3) 0 OD cultures. The unfilled boxes indicate a negative control which contain thrombin and thrombin cleavage buffer and cellulose bandage just covering the bottom of the well. The filled boxes is a cellulose bandage which has CBD-Pln1 bound to it, thrombin and thrombin cleavage buffer to release the fusion peptide from the bandage and into solution. The triangles contain a cellulose bandage which has CBD-Pln1 bound to it, thrombin cleavage buffer was added as well to show antimicrobial activity of immobilized CBD-Pln1. The media used was low salt LB (0.4 g/L NaCl). The error bars represent the mean ± SD from two independent experiments.

Immobilization on a cellulose bandage

To show the proof of principle for iGEM19 Linköping's project, the antimicrobial agents were fused to a cellulose bandage (Epiprotect). The cellulose was first incubated with E. coli BL21 (DE3) lysate (20 mL) containing CBD-Pln1 for two hours in 4 degrees Celsius. After immobilization of the agent to cellulose, the bandage was washed three times with CBM-buffer (10 mL), or until no foam can be seen. The foam build-up is because of the lysate also containing 1% Triton X100, which will heavily interfere with the results. After washing, small pieces of bandage was cut out to fit into a well of a 96-well plate. Added to this well was also low salt LB-media (0.4 g/L NaCl) and E. coli BL21 (DE3) at OD600 0. Thrombin cleavage buffer (20 mM Tris-HCl, 150 mM NaCl and 2.5 mM CaCl2) were added to all wells, and thrombin (0.05 U, 0.6 uM) were added to release the agent into the solution. The negative control had both thrombin cleavage buffer and thrombin. In Figure B. the results from this experiment can be seen. Noticeably, the thrombin released agent inhibited the E. coli growth the most of the combinations tested. This shows that the proof of principle of iGEM19 Linköping's main mechanism is working.