Difference between revisions of "Part:BBa K300007:Experience"

Line 15: Line 15:
 
__NOTOC__
 
__NOTOC__
 
Sequencing of this part showed some (negligible) difformities when compared with the submitted sequence: see
 
Sequencing of this part showed some (negligible) difformities when compared with the submitted sequence: see
+
|-
 
<partinfo>BBa_K300007 AddReview 0</partinfo>
 
<partinfo>BBa_K300007 AddReview 0</partinfo>
 
<I>TU Munich iGEM 2012</I>
 
<I>TU Munich iGEM 2012</I>

Revision as of 23:24, 26 September 2012

This experience page is provided so that any user may enter their experience using this part.
Please enter how you used this part and how it worked out.

Applications of BBa_K300007

User Reviews

UNIQb50ed3dda2473630-partinfo-00000000-QINU

TU Munich iGEM 2012

Idea


For proof of principle, we want to insert a functional mOrange cassette (BBa K300007), cut the integrative vector with SbfI in order to linearize it and transfect it into yeasts. After we've shown the general functionality, we'll work on and integrate one gene after another until all of our biobricks are integrated. In order to do that, we have to engineer new homologous regions to enable multiple transgenic integrations.


Integrational vector method TUM12.jpg


To show, that the stable integration worked, we picked 36 clones from the plates with yeasts transformed with the linearized integration vector plasmid (insert: BBa K300007[1]). These 36 clones were put into non-selective YPD medium and passaged 4 times. After 48 hours, the last culture was used to inoculate an overnight culture. The OD of all candidates was measured. We had 5 negatives, probably due to mistakes in pipeting. The rest of the cultures were diluted to OD 0.4 and 100 ml of it were used to plate on selective (meaning G418+) petri dishes.

Results


Of the 31 remaining plates, 21 were empty. The cfu of the positive plates were:
Genome integration cfu TUM12.png
  • 3
  • 8
  • 12
  • 49
  • 68
  • 282
  • >1000
  • >10 000
  • >10 000
  • >10 000

The plan is to PCR at least two of the clones to gain knowledge why there's been such drastic differences in between the different clones regarding the in the integration efficiency and endurance.

As of the mOrange cassette (BBa K300007[2]), we couldn't show any fluorescence which suggests a corrupt insert.


BBa_K300006 for details.

UNIPV-Pavia iGEM 2010

Sequencing of this part showed some (negligible) difformities when compared with the submitted sequence: see

UNIQb50ed3dda2473630-partinfo-00000004-QINU