Difference between revisions of "Part:BBa K2656106"

Line 14: Line 14:
 
</ul>
 
</ul>
 
</html>
 
</html>
 +
 +
This transcriptional unit has been used to characterize the constitutive [https://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K2656004 BBa_K2656004 promoter]. Following this [http://2018.igem.org/Team:Valencia_UPV/Modeling#http://2018.igem.org/Team:Valencia_UPV/Experiments#exp_protocol experimental protocol], we have obtained the parameters to valide our  [http://2018.igem.org/Team:Valencia_UPV/Modeling#models constitutive model] and so the results of the next graph have been obtained after an [http://2018.igem.org/Team:Valencia_UPV/Modeling#optimization optimization] and decision-making process, in which the optimal parameters have been selected and the constituent model for each objective has been simulated and compared with the experimental data.
 +
 +
[[File:|900px|thumb|none|alt=Promoter experiment.|Figure 1. Promoter expression experiment with composite parts BBa_K2656105, BBa_K2656106 and BBa_K2656107]]
 +
 +
{|class='wikitable'
 +
|colspan=4|Table 1. Optimized parameters for the BBa_K2656106.
 +
|-
 +
|'''Parameter'''
 +
|'''Value'''
 +
|-
 +
|Translation rate p
 +
|p =
 +
|-
 +
|Dilution rate μ
 +
| μ =
 +
|-
 +
| PoI degradation rate
 +
| Promoter Experiment: dp =
 +
 +
|}
 +
 +
  
  

Revision as of 22:19, 14 October 2018


GFP transcriptional unit 2

Transcriptional unit assembled with a one-pot [http://2018.igem.org/Team:Valencia_UPV/Design Level 1] Golden Gate reaction using BsaI type IIS endonuclease.

This transcriptional unit is composed of the following standardized parts from our [http://2018.igem.org/Team:Valencia_UPV/Part_Collection Part Collection]:

This transcriptional unit has been used to characterize the constitutive BBa_K2656004 promoter. Following this [http://2018.igem.org/Team:Valencia_UPV/Modeling#http://2018.igem.org/Team:Valencia_UPV/Experiments#exp_protocol experimental protocol], we have obtained the parameters to valide our [http://2018.igem.org/Team:Valencia_UPV/Modeling#models constitutive model] and so the results of the next graph have been obtained after an [http://2018.igem.org/Team:Valencia_UPV/Modeling#optimization optimization] and decision-making process, in which the optimal parameters have been selected and the constituent model for each objective has been simulated and compared with the experimental data.

[[File:|900px|thumb|none|alt=Promoter experiment.|Figure 1. Promoter expression experiment with composite parts BBa_K2656105, BBa_K2656106 and BBa_K2656107]]

Table 1. Optimized parameters for the BBa_K2656106.
Parameter Value
Translation rate p p =
Dilution rate μ μ =
PoI degradation rate Promoter Experiment: dp =



Sequence and Features


Assembly Compatibility:
  • 10
    COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[10]
  • 12
    INCOMPATIBLE WITH RFC[12]
    Illegal NheI site found at 11
    Illegal NheI site found at 34
  • 21
    COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[21]
  • 23
    COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[23]
  • 25
    COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[25]
  • 1000
    COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[1000]