Difference between revisions of "Part:BBa K2213007"
| Line 32: | Line 32: | ||
https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/3/31/TagExpression500p.jpg | https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/3/31/TagExpression500p.jpg | ||
<br> | <br> | ||
| − | The expression levels compared to low and high are as shown. As the medium strength promoter had similar expression levels to the high promoter, it was not expressed alongside any Eut subunits.<br> | + | The expression levels compared to low and high are as shown. As the medium strength promoter had similar expression levels to the high promoter, it was not expressed alongside any Eut subunits. This result was unexpected and should be taken into consideration when choosing either the medium or high promoter.<br> |
Revision as of 20:01, 31 October 2017
MediumPromoter_PduD(1-20)_mCherry
This part is an improved version of https://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K562001, submitted by Dundee 2011.
Sequence and Features
- 10COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[10]
- 12INCOMPATIBLE WITH RFC[12]Illegal NheI site found at 7
Illegal NheI site found at 30 - 21COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[21]
- 23COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[23]
- 25COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[25]
- 1000COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[1000]
Function:
This part is an improved version of https://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K562001, originally submitted by team Dundee 2011. The original part contained an illegal XbaI site which has been removed to make it biobrick compatible. This part has been expressed under different strength promoters. A medium strength Anderson promoter here, low strength Anderson promoter (https://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K2213006), and a high strength Anderson promoter (https://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K2213008).
The PduD tag was combined with the medium strength Anderson promoter (https://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_J23108) and mCherry.
A gradient of fluorescence is evident when compared to low and high promoters. When expressed the distribution of the mCherry signal was homogeneous and fluorescence level was slightly less than the high promoter.
.
The expression levels compared to low and high are as shown. As the medium strength promoter had similar expression levels to the high promoter, it was not expressed alongside any Eut subunits. This result was unexpected and should be taken into consideration when choosing either the medium or high promoter.