Difference between revisions of "Part:BBa K4271001"
(→Test:) |
(→Analysis of Result:) |
||
Line 47: | Line 47: | ||
===Analysis of Result:=== | ===Analysis of Result:=== | ||
− | |||
<html> | <html> |
Latest revision as of 07:17, 11 October 2022
T7 Promoter + Lac operator + RBS + OPH + T7 terminator
Engineering
Build:
Synthetic oph gene we used in this study is derived from the opd (organophosphate degradation) gene in Agrobacterium tumefaciens and performed with codon usage optimization for E. coli heteroexpression. We digested the oph gene with BamHI and HindIII, subcloned it to pET22b vectors that underwent the same restriction enzyme digestion, then transformed the recombinant into E. coli DH5α. The transformation was conducted by plasmid extraction through mini-prep.
We later confirmed the insertion of our oph gene into the enzyme plasmid by enzyme digestion, cutting the recombinant DNA with BamHI and HindIII respectively, and observing the same band sizes of 6.5 kilobases after gel electrophoresis (left). We later digested our pET22b::OPH again with both BamHI and HindIII, two of resulting DNA bands include the 1071 base-long oph and the 5479 base-long pET22b vector (right). Finally, the plasmid was transformed into the competent cells E.coli BL21(DE3) via heat shock, which we later used to examine the level of paraoxon degradation by our enzyme plasmid.
Test:
To test the degradation of paraoxon by OPH, we detected the level of pNP production with a spectrophotometer. Since pNP (yellow) reaches an absorbance peak at 410 nm, we assume that the absorbance at 410 nm of the colonies under different conditions will provide us with an overview of the efficiency of paraoxon degradation by OPH. We performed two experiments based on this assumption: the amount of pNP at various time points (pNP conc. v.s. Time) and in the presence of different IPTG concentrations at a fixed time (pNP conc. v.s. IPTG conc.).
Analysis of Result:
(Absorbance at 410nm - background data)/ OD600 | (Supernatant Absorbance at 410nm - background data)/ OD600 | ||
1. BL2(DE3) (negative control) | 0 | 0 | |
2. BL2(DE3) +paraoxon (experimental) | 0.2323266987 | 0.3905284832 | |
3. BL2(DE3) +pNP (positive control) | 8.905950096 | 9.966890595 | |
4. PET::OPH +IPTG induction (negative control) | 0 | 0 | |
5. PET::OPH +paraoxon +IPTG induction (experimental) | 6.720481928 | 6.916144578 | |
6. PET::OPH +pNP +IPTG induction (positive control) | 11.83912249 | 12.51005484 |
Model
Due to the recently published nature of the OPH we used, there are limited resources regarding this variant of OPH. Among these studies on this OPH, there was no research that provides quantitative analysis for this OPH. Therefore we contributed to this OPH part by fitting our experimental data with our model to evaluate the rate reaction constants of this OPH quantitatively. We constructed this model using Enzyme Kinetics. On this basis, there are three reactions concerning OPH. One of them is the reversible reaction of PXN binding with OPH, forming the complex OPH::PXN. The reaction rate constants for this reaction are kOPH_PXN_f and kOPH_PXN_r, denoting the forward and reverse reaction respectively. The rest of the reactions are hydrolysis and degradation; their reaction rate constants are khydro, and kdOPH respectively. We used data collected from different IPTG concentrations and fitted them with the model we constructed and yielded the values summarized in the table below.
Then we used these constants to simulate a pNP curve for any other experimental data. The curve was plotted with the data and proved that our proposed kinetics are reasonable.
References:
Jha, Ramesh K., et al. “A Microbial Sensor for Organophosphate Hydrolysis Exploiting an Engineered Specificity Switch in a Transcription Factor.” Nucleic Acids Research, vol. 44, no. 17, 2016, pp. 8490–500. Crossref, https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkw687.
Jain, Monika et al. “Recombinant organophosphorus hydrolase (OPH) expression in E. coli for the effective detection of organophosphate pesticides.” Protein Expression and Purification, Volume 186, 2021, 105929, ISSN 1046-5928, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pep.2021.105929
Sequence and Features
- 10COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[10]
- 12INCOMPATIBLE WITH RFC[12]Illegal NheI site found at 1259
Illegal NotI site found at 1219 - 21INCOMPATIBLE WITH RFC[21]Illegal XhoI site found at 1228
- 23COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[23]
- 25INCOMPATIBLE WITH RFC[25]Illegal NgoMIV site found at 330
Illegal AgeI site found at 150
Illegal AgeI site found at 435
Illegal AgeI site found at 570
Illegal AgeI site found at 633 - 1000COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[1000]