Difference between revisions of "Part:BBa K2992034"
(→Characterisation) |
m (→Characterisation) |
||
(4 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
===Characterisation=== | ===Characterisation=== | ||
− | Before assessing the ability of our chosen acetone production pathways to generate acetone in our <i>C. sporogenes</i> reporter strains, we first assessed promoter activity using our FAST reporter [https://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K2992002 BBa_K2992002]. We compared promoter activities of our chosen promoters P<i>botR</i> [https://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K2992012 BBa_K2992012] and P<i>ntnH</i> [https://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K2992001 BBa_K2992001] alongside three constitutive clostridial promoters P<i> | + | Before assessing the ability of our chosen acetone production pathways to generate acetone in our <i>C. sporogenes</i> reporter strains, we first assessed promoter activity using our FAST reporter [https://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K2992002 BBa_K2992002]. We compared promoter activities of our chosen promoters P<i>botR</i> [https://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K2992012 BBa_K2992012] and P<i>ntnH</i> [https://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K2992001 BBa_K2992001] alongside three constitutive clostridial promoters P<i>fdxc14t</i> [https://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K2992016 BBa_K2992016], P<i>fdxt14c</i> [https://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K2715011 BBa_ K2715011] and P<i>thl</i> [https://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K2715010 BBa_ K2715010] and the <i>E. coli</i> promoter J23106 [https://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_J23106 BBa_ J23106]. The plasmids were cloned upstream of the FAST reporter gene and ligated into pMTL82151 plasmids. FAST reporter assays were conducted on both <i>E. coli</i> and <i>C. sporogenes</i> lysates following transfer of genetic material thereto. <br> |
[[File:FAST.png]] | [[File:FAST.png]] | ||
<br>In the <i>C. sporogenes</i> experiments, adequate expression was detected for each of the clostridial promoters chosen for study. The two P<i>fdx</i> derivatives generated the greatest level of reporter activity whilst the two <i>C. botulinum</i> promoters generated much lower levels of activity. Reporter activity appeared to be generally higher when analysed from the <i>E. coli</i> lysates as opposed to the <i>C. sporogenes</i> lysates. In those experiments, activity from the P<i>botR</i> and P<i>ntnh</i> constructs were considerably greater than the no promoter control. <br><br> | <br>In the <i>C. sporogenes</i> experiments, adequate expression was detected for each of the clostridial promoters chosen for study. The two P<i>fdx</i> derivatives generated the greatest level of reporter activity whilst the two <i>C. botulinum</i> promoters generated much lower levels of activity. Reporter activity appeared to be generally higher when analysed from the <i>E. coli</i> lysates as opposed to the <i>C. sporogenes</i> lysates. In those experiments, activity from the P<i>botR</i> and P<i>ntnh</i> constructs were considerably greater than the no promoter control. <br><br> | ||
− | Having established the functionality of our chosen promoters. We next assessed the feasibility of using these to drive acetone production in our reporter strains. In our design approach, we rationalized that either <i>C. botulinum</i> [https://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K2992003 BBa_K2992003] | + | Having established the functionality of our chosen promoters. We next assessed the feasibility of using these to drive acetone production in our reporter strains. In our design approach, we rationalized that either <i>C. botulinum</i> [https://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K2992003 BBa_K2992003] [https://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K2992007 BBa_K2992007] [https://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K2992005 BBa_K2992005] or <i>C. acetobutylicum</i>-derived <i>ctfAB</i> [[https://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_M36581 BBa_M36581]. [https://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_M36582 BBa_M36582], encoding the A and B subunits of the butyrate-acetoacetate CoA-transferase complex, should permit acetone production. To test this, we transformed pMTL82151 plasmids encoding our acetone pathways using <i>C. botulinum</i> <i>ctfAB</i> [https://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K2992029 BBa_K2992029] or <i>C. acetobutylicum</i> <i>ctfAB</i> [https://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K2992036 BBa_K2992036], both under the control of P<i>ntnH</i>, into our P<i>botR-botR</i> reporter strain of <i>C. sporogenes</i>. |
− | + | ||
<br> | <br> | ||
[[File:CtfAB.PNG]] | [[File:CtfAB.PNG]] | ||
− | The data clearly indicates that <i>ctfAB</i> from <i>C. acetobutylicum</i> was much better suited to providing acetone production capacity to our <i>C. sporogenes</i> reporter strains. As a consequence, we selected the acetone production pathway cb_PntnH-5-UTR+RBS-ca_thl-ca_ctfAB-cp_TFdx [https://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K2992036 BBa_K2992036] to assess acetone production in all of our | + | |
+ | The data clearly indicates that <i>ctfAB</i> from <i>C. acetobutylicum</i> was much better suited to providing acetone production capacity to our <i>C. sporogenes</i> reporter strains. As a consequence, we selected the acetone production pathway cb_PntnH-5-UTR+RBS-ca_thl-ca_ctfAB-cp_TFdx [https://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K2992036 BBa_K2992036] to assess acetone production in all of our promoter-<i>botR</i> genome integrant strains. The construct was cloned into pMTL82151 and transformed into our various promoter-<i>botR</i> strains and controls. | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
[[File:Acetone data.png]] | [[File:Acetone data.png]] | ||
<br> | <br> | ||
− | The data demonstrated appreciable acetone production of >2nM concentration when using either the native P<i>botR</i> promoter and associated 5’-UTR+RBS or the RBS only construct to permit polar transcription from | + | The data demonstrated appreciable acetone production of >2nM concentration when using either the native P<i>botR</i> promoter and associated 5’-UTR+RBS or the RBS only construct to permit polar transcription from P<i>pyrKDE</i>. Considerable acetone production (4-6nM) was observed when using the constitutive clostridial promoter P<i>fdx</i>. Crucially, acetone production was comparably scant when <i>botR</i> was absent from the genome of <i>C. sporogenes</i> and when no promoter was used to drive expression of the acetone production operon. These data provide experimental validation for the production of acetone in <i>C. sporogenes</i> as a model for Botulinum toxin prediction in foodstuffs. |
− | + | ||
Line 31: | Line 32: | ||
===References=== | ===References=== | ||
− | |||
− | |||
+ | Cornillot, E., Croux, C. and Soucaille, P. (1997). Physical and genetic map of the Clostridium acetobutylicum ATCC 824 chromosome. Journal of Bacteriology, 179(23), pp.7426-7434. | ||
+ | |||
+ | Heap, J., Pennington, O., Cartman, S. and Minton, N. (2009). A modular system for Clostridium shuttle plasmids. Journal of Microbiological Methods, 78(1), pp.79-85. | ||
<!-- Uncomment this to enable Functional Parameter display | <!-- Uncomment this to enable Functional Parameter display |
Latest revision as of 21:01, 21 October 2019
Acetone pathway: ca_thl-ca_ctfAB-cp_TFdx
Promoterless acetone production pathway with C. acetobutylicum thl, ctfAB and adc genes.
Usage and Biology
This parts entry represents a promoterless acetone-production pathway for plasmid-borne expression in C. sporogenes. The entry comprises the thiolase gene thl BBa_K2992008 and acetoacetate decarboxylase adc gene BBa_M36585 coupled with the two units of the ctfAB complex BBa_M36581 and BBa_M36582 which are all derived from C. acetobutylicum. Transcriptional termination for this synthetic acetone-production operon occurs through the activity of Tfdx from C. pasteurianum BBa_K2284012. In our project we used genome-scale modelling to predict the necessary genes required to produce acetone in our chosen surrogate strain C. sporogenes. We sought to link acetone production with C. botulinum neurotoxin production by the integration of the neurotoxin transcriptional regulator botR onto the chromosome of C. sporogenes and by using promoter regions from the regulon of botR to control the acetone-production operons. In doing so, we hoped to generate our surrogate host strain as a model for predicting neurotoxin production in foodstuffs following food manufacturing processes.
Characterisation
Before assessing the ability of our chosen acetone production pathways to generate acetone in our C. sporogenes reporter strains, we first assessed promoter activity using our FAST reporter BBa_K2992002. We compared promoter activities of our chosen promoters PbotR BBa_K2992012 and PntnH BBa_K2992001 alongside three constitutive clostridial promoters Pfdxc14t BBa_K2992016, Pfdxt14c BBa_ K2715011 and Pthl BBa_ K2715010 and the E. coli promoter J23106 BBa_ J23106. The plasmids were cloned upstream of the FAST reporter gene and ligated into pMTL82151 plasmids. FAST reporter assays were conducted on both E. coli and C. sporogenes lysates following transfer of genetic material thereto.
In the C. sporogenes experiments, adequate expression was detected for each of the clostridial promoters chosen for study. The two Pfdx derivatives generated the greatest level of reporter activity whilst the two C. botulinum promoters generated much lower levels of activity. Reporter activity appeared to be generally higher when analysed from the E. coli lysates as opposed to the C. sporogenes lysates. In those experiments, activity from the PbotR and Pntnh constructs were considerably greater than the no promoter control.
Having established the functionality of our chosen promoters. We next assessed the feasibility of using these to drive acetone production in our reporter strains. In our design approach, we rationalized that either C. botulinum BBa_K2992003 BBa_K2992007 BBa_K2992005 or C. acetobutylicum-derived ctfAB [BBa_M36581. BBa_M36582, encoding the A and B subunits of the butyrate-acetoacetate CoA-transferase complex, should permit acetone production. To test this, we transformed pMTL82151 plasmids encoding our acetone pathways using C. botulinum ctfAB BBa_K2992029 or C. acetobutylicum ctfAB BBa_K2992036, both under the control of PntnH, into our PbotR-botR reporter strain of C. sporogenes.
The data clearly indicates that ctfAB from C. acetobutylicum was much better suited to providing acetone production capacity to our C. sporogenes reporter strains. As a consequence, we selected the acetone production pathway cb_PntnH-5-UTR+RBS-ca_thl-ca_ctfAB-cp_TFdx BBa_K2992036 to assess acetone production in all of our promoter-botR genome integrant strains. The construct was cloned into pMTL82151 and transformed into our various promoter-botR strains and controls.
The data demonstrated appreciable acetone production of >2nM concentration when using either the native PbotR promoter and associated 5’-UTR+RBS or the RBS only construct to permit polar transcription from PpyrKDE. Considerable acetone production (4-6nM) was observed when using the constitutive clostridial promoter Pfdx. Crucially, acetone production was comparably scant when botR was absent from the genome of C. sporogenes and when no promoter was used to drive expression of the acetone production operon. These data provide experimental validation for the production of acetone in C. sporogenes as a model for Botulinum toxin prediction in foodstuffs.
Sequence and Features
- 10INCOMPATIBLE WITH RFC[10]Illegal XbaI site found at 355
Illegal PstI site found at 1894
Illegal PstI site found at 3159 - 12INCOMPATIBLE WITH RFC[12]Illegal PstI site found at 1894
Illegal PstI site found at 3159 - 21COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[21]
- 23INCOMPATIBLE WITH RFC[23]Illegal XbaI site found at 355
Illegal PstI site found at 1894
Illegal PstI site found at 3159 - 25INCOMPATIBLE WITH RFC[25]Illegal XbaI site found at 355
Illegal PstI site found at 1894
Illegal PstI site found at 3159 - 1000COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[1000]
References
Cornillot, E., Croux, C. and Soucaille, P. (1997). Physical and genetic map of the Clostridium acetobutylicum ATCC 824 chromosome. Journal of Bacteriology, 179(23), pp.7426-7434.
Heap, J., Pennington, O., Cartman, S. and Minton, N. (2009). A modular system for Clostridium shuttle plasmids. Journal of Microbiological Methods, 78(1), pp.79-85.