Difference between revisions of "Part:BBa K2380000"

 
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)
Line 11: Line 11:
 
The NodC protein has strongly hydrophobic domains which indicate that it is an integral or transmembrane protein.<br><br>
 
The NodC protein has strongly hydrophobic domains which indicate that it is an integral or transmembrane protein.<br><br>
 
To learn more about NodC and its part in our project, visit our [http://2017.igem.org/Team:TU_Darmstadt/project/chitin_synthase Wiki].
 
To learn more about NodC and its part in our project, visit our [http://2017.igem.org/Team:TU_Darmstadt/project/chitin_synthase Wiki].
 +
</p>
 
<h2>2. Mechanism</h2>
 
<h2>2. Mechanism</h2>
<p>NodC is involved in the synthesis of chitin oligosaccharides, but only with a polymerization degree up to five [Kamst et al., 1995].  
+
<p> NodC is involved in the synthesis of chitin oligosaccharides, but only with a polymerization degree up to five [Kamst et al., 1995].  
 
NodC uses UDP-N-acetylglucosamine (UDP-GlcNAc) as sugar donor, which is a precursor for the biosynthesis of peptidoglycan and therefore present in growing bacterial cells.  
 
NodC uses UDP-N-acetylglucosamine (UDP-GlcNAc) as sugar donor, which is a precursor for the biosynthesis of peptidoglycan and therefore present in growing bacterial cells.  
 
The mechanism of elongation proceeds by a successive nucleophilic substitution reaction at C1 of the UDP-GlcNAc – molecule (Figure 1). UDP departs when the O4 atom of the growing sugar chain attacks as a nucleophile [Dorfmueller et al., 2014].
 
The mechanism of elongation proceeds by a successive nucleophilic substitution reaction at C1 of the UDP-GlcNAc – molecule (Figure 1). UDP departs when the O4 atom of the growing sugar chain attacks as a nucleophile [Dorfmueller et al., 2014].
Line 35: Line 36:
 
<h2>Results</h2>
 
<h2>Results</h2>
 
<p>
 
<p>
The <i>nodC</i> gene was expressed under the control of constitutive Anderson promoter (BBa_K2380025) and by arabinose-inducible AraC promoter (BBa_K808000) in <i>E.coli</i> Top10. Due to the <i>E.coli</i> cells' own proteins it was not possible to verify the NodC protein clearly. To verify the expression of the NodC enzyme a SDS-PAGE was done after the purification instead (Figure 3).
+
The <i>nodC</i> gene was expressed under the control of constitutive Anderson promoter [https://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K2380025 (BBa_K2380025)] and by arabinose-inducible AraC promoter [https://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K808000 (BBa_K808000)] in <i>E.coli</i> Top10. Due to the <i>E.coli</i> cells' own proteins it was not possible to verify the NodC protein clearly. To verify the expression of the NodC enzyme a SDS-PAGE was done after the purification instead (Figure 3).
 
The fractions after the ÄKTA purification were collected and the purity was examined via a SDS-PAGE. The SDS-PAGE shows a band at 21 kDA (Figure 3, red arrow) which fits to our protein size. The verification was done by using these fractions for a functional assay for the enzyme. The assay shows enzyme activity and therefore proofs the successful expression.
 
The fractions after the ÄKTA purification were collected and the purity was examined via a SDS-PAGE. The SDS-PAGE shows a band at 21 kDA (Figure 3, red arrow) which fits to our protein size. The verification was done by using these fractions for a functional assay for the enzyme. The assay shows enzyme activity and therefore proofs the successful expression.
 
</p>
 
</p>
Line 49: Line 50:
 
<p><b>Figure 4: UDP standard curve.</b> The standard curve shows the linearity and sensitivity of the <i>UDP-Glo™ Lycosyltransferase Assay</i>. The curve was prepared over the indicated range of UDP concentration in 25 µl buffer. The luminescence was measured after 1 hour of incubation with a <i>Tecan200 Infinite Pro</i> plate reader. Values represent the mean of two replicates and the standard deviation is shown. For better visibility the values for the small concentrations are shown in the additional graph. The following assay (Figure 5) is based on this standard curve. RLU = relative light units.</p>
 
<p><b>Figure 4: UDP standard curve.</b> The standard curve shows the linearity and sensitivity of the <i>UDP-Glo™ Lycosyltransferase Assay</i>. The curve was prepared over the indicated range of UDP concentration in 25 µl buffer. The luminescence was measured after 1 hour of incubation with a <i>Tecan200 Infinite Pro</i> plate reader. Values represent the mean of two replicates and the standard deviation is shown. For better visibility the values for the small concentrations are shown in the additional graph. The following assay (Figure 5) is based on this standard curve. RLU = relative light units.</p>
 
https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/thumb/1/1f/T--TU_Darmstadt--Assay1110NodC.png/800px-T--TU_Darmstadt--Assay1110NodC.png
 
https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/thumb/1/1f/T--TU_Darmstadt--Assay1110NodC.png/800px-T--TU_Darmstadt--Assay1110NodC.png
<p><b>Figure 5: Activity assay of NodC.</b> NodC (40 ng) was titrated in 1X glycosyltransferase reaction buffer in the presence of 100μM of UDP-<i>N</i>-acetylglcosamine and 10mM <i>N</i>-acetylglucosamine (GlcNAc) as an acceptor substrate. The reaction was performed as described before and the luminescence was measured after 1 hour of incubation with a <i>Tecan200 Infinite Pro</i> plate reader. Each point is an average of two experiments, and the error bars represent the standard deviations. RLU = relative light units.</p>
+
<p><b>Figure 5: Activity assay of NodC.</b> NodC (40 ng) was titrated in 1X glycosyltransferase reaction buffer in the presence of 100 μM of UDP-<i>N</i>-acetylglcosamine and 10 mM <i>N</i>-acetylglucosamine (GlcNAc) as an acceptor substrate. The reaction was performed as described before and the luminescence was measured after 1 hour of incubation with a <i>Tecan200 Infinite Pro</i> plate reader. Each point is an average of two experiments, and the error bars represent the standard deviations. RLU = relative light units.</p>
  
  
Line 79: Line 80:
  
 
<li>Dorfmueller, H.C., Ferenbach, A. T., Borodkin, V. S., and van Aalten, D. M. F.
 
<li>Dorfmueller, H.C., Ferenbach, A. T., Borodkin, V. S., and van Aalten, D. M. F.
(2014) A Structural and Biochemical Model of Processive Chitin Synthesis. The</li>
+
(2014) A Structural and Biochemical Model of Processive Chitin Synthesis. The Journal of Biological Chemistry, 289, 23020 – 23028 
 +
DOI: 10.1074/jbc.M114.563353</li>
 +
<li>Promega (2015) UDP-Glo TM  Glycosyltransferase Assay, Technical Manual</li>
  
 
<li>Cos, T., Ford, R. A., Trilla, J. A., Duran, A., Cabib, E., and Roncero, C. (1998) Molecular analysis of Chs3p participation in chitin synthase III activity. The FEBS Journal, 256, 419 – 426
 
<li>Cos, T., Ford, R. A., Trilla, J. A., Duran, A., Cabib, E., and Roncero, C. (1998) Molecular analysis of Chs3p participation in chitin synthase III activity. The FEBS Journal, 256, 419 – 426

Latest revision as of 22:47, 1 November 2017


Chitin synthase NodC from Rhizobium leguminosarum

The Chitin Synthase (CHS) NodC from Rhizobium leguminosarum is an N-acetylglucosaminyltransferase, which catalyzes the formation of chitin oligomers by using UDP-N-acetylglucosamine as donor and N-acetylglucosamine as acceptor.

1. Usage and Biology

Besides cellulose, chitin is the most common natural polysaccharide in nature. Chitin is composed of β(1,4) linked 2-acetamido-2-deoxy-β-D-glucose (N-acetylglucosamine). The polymer is a component of fungal cell walls and the exoskeletons of insects and crustaceans, like crabs or shrimps [Dutta et al., 2004; Kumar, 2000]. The extraction of chitin from crustaceans produces a lot of waste and uses a lot of chemicals. But bacteria, like E. coli can produce chitin via a chitin synthase (CHS) in an environmentally friendly manner. The production of chitin appears to be important as it is a useful substance, that finds applications in medicinal, industrial and biotechnological research. Chitin, and its derivative chitosan, are non-toxic, biocompatible and biodegradable. Their bioactivities are for example the promotion of wound healing or hemostatic activity, immune enhancement, eliciting biological responses, and antimicrobial activity [Kurita, 2006]. The nodC gene is originating from the gram-negative bacterium Rhizobium leguminosarum and is a homologue to the chitin synthase from yeast. Rhizobium species live in symbiosis with legumes, where the bacteria form nitrogen-fixing nodules in the legume roots. This interaction leads to an activation of the bacterial nodulation (nod) genes and the secretion of Nod factors. nodC belongs to these nod genes, that create and modify the Nod factors. The NodC protein has strongly hydrophobic domains which indicate that it is an integral or transmembrane protein.

To learn more about NodC and its part in our project, visit our [http://2017.igem.org/Team:TU_Darmstadt/project/chitin_synthase Wiki].

2. Mechanism

NodC is involved in the synthesis of chitin oligosaccharides, but only with a polymerization degree up to five [Kamst et al., 1995]. NodC uses UDP-N-acetylglucosamine (UDP-GlcNAc) as sugar donor, which is a precursor for the biosynthesis of peptidoglycan and therefore present in growing bacterial cells. The mechanism of elongation proceeds by a successive nucleophilic substitution reaction at C1 of the UDP-GlcNAc – molecule (Figure 1). UDP departs when the O4 atom of the growing sugar chain attacks as a nucleophile [Dorfmueller et al., 2014]. With a low concentration of UDP-GlcNAc NodC produces a mixture of trimers, tetramers and pentamers and with high concentrations of UDP-GlcNAc it produces pentamers solely. It almost exclusively directs the formation of pentasaccharides [Samain et al., 1997].

595px-T--TU_Darmstadt--NodC-Mech3.jpeg

Figure 1: Mechanism of NodC. The enzyme uses UDP-acetylglucosamine as donor and N-acetylglucosamine as acceptor and creates chitin pentamers.

Methods

3. Expression

The nodC gene was synthesized by IDT. We inserted the gene into BioBrick vector pSB1C3 vector and verified the DNA sequence by sanger sequencing (Eurofins Genomics). The gene nodC was expressed under control of constitutive Anderson promoter BBa_J23100 (BBa_K2380001) as well as under control of L-arabinose inducible araC promoter BBa_K808000 (BBa_K2380002). In both cases BBa_K2380024 was used as RBS and E.coli BL21 as expression strain. To examine the successful expression, a SDS-PAGE was performed.

4. Purification

The next step was the purification of the protein and the verification of the enzyme function. To purify the enzyme, the nodC C-Terminus was featured with a His-taq and the protein was purified via an ÄKTA chromatography system in combination with a 1 mL HisTrap column by GE Healthcare.

5. Activity Assays

UDP-GloTM Glycosyltransferase Assay

NodC is a N-acetylglucosamine transferase that uses UDP-GlcNAc as donor molecule. To test the functionality of the nodC enzyme, the UDP-GloTM Glycosyltransferase Assay (Promega) was used. The NodC transfers N-acetylglucosamine from the UDP-GlcNAc to single N-acetylglucosamine bricks. The assay is a homogenous, single-reagent-addition method to detect UDP. In a first reaction the glycosyltransferase adds the UDP-GlcNac to the acceptor molecule and UDP is set free. In a second step the UDP is converted to ATP via a UDP Detection Reagent. This ATP generates light in a luciferase reaction which can be measured using a luminometer.

799px-T--TU_Darmstadt--UDP-Glo-Assay.png

Figure 2: Principle of the UDP-GloTM Glycosyltransferase Assay. After the glycosyltransferase reaction, UDP Detection Reagent is added and UDP is converted to ATP. This converts UDP to ATP and generates light via a luciferase reaction.

Results

The nodC gene was expressed under the control of constitutive Anderson promoter (BBa_K2380025) and by arabinose-inducible AraC promoter (BBa_K808000) in E.coli Top10. Due to the E.coli cells' own proteins it was not possible to verify the NodC protein clearly. To verify the expression of the NodC enzyme a SDS-PAGE was done after the purification instead (Figure 3). The fractions after the ÄKTA purification were collected and the purity was examined via a SDS-PAGE. The SDS-PAGE shows a band at 21 kDA (Figure 3, red arrow) which fits to our protein size. The verification was done by using these fractions for a functional assay for the enzyme. The assay shows enzyme activity and therefore proofs the successful expression.

534px-T--TU_Darmstadt--SDS-PAGE-Purification.png

Figure 3: SDS-PAGE after ÄKTA purification. The SDS-PAGE shows fraction 17 and 18 from the ÄKTA purification. A band at the size of 21 kDa can be seen (red arrow). This band was verfied to be our enzyme by the following activity assay. Marker is the Page Ruler Prestained Ladder from Thermo Fischer.

To verify the functionality of the NodC enzyme, the UDP-GloTM Glycosyltransferase Assay was performed. The UDP standard curve shows increasing luminescence with increasing UDP concentration. With this curve the conversion to free UDP can be calculated. The evaluation of the assay with sample 17 (vgl Figure 3) shows that the NodC enzyme converts the UDP-GlcNAc to free UPD and a growing oligo-GlcNAc-chain. Thus, the assay shows that the NodC enzyme can synthesize chitin oligomers. All data were measured as duplet and the standard deviation is shown.

800px-T--TU_Darmstadt--UDP1110.png

Figure 4: UDP standard curve. The standard curve shows the linearity and sensitivity of the UDP-Glo™ Lycosyltransferase Assay. The curve was prepared over the indicated range of UDP concentration in 25 µl buffer. The luminescence was measured after 1 hour of incubation with a Tecan200 Infinite Pro plate reader. Values represent the mean of two replicates and the standard deviation is shown. For better visibility the values for the small concentrations are shown in the additional graph. The following assay (Figure 5) is based on this standard curve. RLU = relative light units.

800px-T--TU_Darmstadt--Assay1110NodC.png

Figure 5: Activity assay of NodC. NodC (40 ng) was titrated in 1X glycosyltransferase reaction buffer in the presence of 100 μM of UDP-N-acetylglcosamine and 10 mM N-acetylglucosamine (GlcNAc) as an acceptor substrate. The reaction was performed as described before and the luminescence was measured after 1 hour of incubation with a Tecan200 Infinite Pro plate reader. Each point is an average of two experiments, and the error bars represent the standard deviations. RLU = relative light units.


Improved Part

Northwestern 2010


The 2010 iGEM Team from [http://2010.igem.org/Team:Northwestern/Project Northwestern] ran the project “SCIN – Self-regenerating Chitin Induction” in 2010. For this project they designed BBa_K418007 and tried to produce the chitin synthase CHS3 from Saccharomyces cerevisiae in E. coli. This CHS3 encoded by BBa_K418007 is found as the major enzyme in its family. For our project, we also need a chitin synthesizing enzyme. We considered using BBa_K418007 from Northwestern, but after taking a closer look we decided to introduce a new part for this purpose. The CHS3 is a transmembrane protein originating from eukaryotes, which is challenging to integrate in prokaryotes, although the Northwestern team used the cDNA. Furthermore, the enzyme is post-translationally glycosylated, which makes it nearly impossible to express a functional enzyme [Cos et al. 1998].
The sequence of the CHS3 further contains forbidden PstI and XbaI sites (typical standard RFC[10]) inside of the gene (XbaI at 1117 and 1674 and PstI at 2318), so that it is impractical for usage as BioBrick part.
Here, with the presented BioBrick BBa_K2380000 we introduce the functional bacterial chitin synthase from Rhizobium leguminosarum NodC. The DNA sequence of nodC in BBa_K2380000 was further codon optimized for usage in E. coli and is free of restriction enzyme sites forbidden in RFC[10].

References

  1. Kurita, K. (2006) Chitin and Chitosan: Functional Biopolymers from Marine Crustaceans. Marine Biotechnology, 8, 203 – 226 DOI: 10.1007/s10126-005- 0097-5
  2.  
  3. Kamst, E., van der Drift, K. M. G. M., Thomas-Oates, J. E., Lugtenberg, B. J. J., and Spaink, H. P. (1995) Mass Spectrometric Analysis of Chitin Oligosaccharides Produced by Rhizobium NodC Protein in Escherichia coli. Journal of Bacteriology, 177, 6282 - 6285 DOI: 10.1128/jb.177.21.6282-6285.199
  4. Samain, E., Drouillard, S., Heyraud, A., Driguez, H., and Geremia, R. A. (1997) Gram-scale synthesis of recombinant chitooligosaccharides in Escherichia coli. Carbohydrate Research, 302, 35 – 42  DOI: 10.1016/S0008-6215(97)00107- 9
  5. Dutta, P. K., Dutta, J., and Tripathi, V. S. (2004) Chitin and Chitosan: Chemistry, properties and applications. Journal of Scientific & Industrial Research, 63, 20 – 31
  6. Kumar, M. N. V. R. (2000) A review of chitin and chitosan applications. Reactive & Functional Polymers, 46, 1 – 27  DOI: 10.1016/S1381-5148(00)00038- 9
  7. Dorfmueller, H.C., Ferenbach, A. T., Borodkin, V. S., and van Aalten, D. M. F. (2014) A Structural and Biochemical Model of Processive Chitin Synthesis. The Journal of Biological Chemistry, 289, 23020 – 23028  DOI: 10.1074/jbc.M114.563353
  8. Promega (2015) UDP-Glo TM  Glycosyltransferase Assay, Technical Manual
  9. Cos, T., Ford, R. A., Trilla, J. A., Duran, A., Cabib, E., and Roncero, C. (1998) Molecular analysis of Chs3p participation in chitin synthase III activity. The FEBS Journal, 256, 419 – 426 DOI: 10.1046/j.1432-1327.1998.2560419.x


Sequence and Features


Assembly Compatibility:
  • 10
    COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[10]
  • 12
    COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[12]
  • 21
    COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[21]
  • 23
    COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[23]
  • 25
    INCOMPATIBLE WITH RFC[25]
    Illegal AgeI site found at 373
  • 1000
    COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[1000]