Difference between revisions of "Part:BBa K1319002"
AZimmermann (Talk | contribs) (→Characterization) |
(→Additional Characterisation) |
||
(58 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown) | |||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
<partinfo>BBa_K1319002 short</partinfo> | <partinfo>BBa_K1319002 short</partinfo> | ||
− | This part is a RFC[25] dark quencher that is based upon K1319000 (the RFC[25] version of E0030/EYFP) called | + | This part is a RFC[25] dark quencher that is based upon K1319000 (the RFC[25] version of E0030/EYFP) called REACh2. |
Three mutations were introduced that eliminated fluorescence: | Three mutations were introduced that eliminated fluorescence: | ||
Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
===Usage and Biology=== | ===Usage and Biology=== | ||
− | This protein is designed to be a dark quencher for GFP ([https://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_E0040 E0040]) in a FRET system. When used in a fusion protein with GFP it reduces the observed fluorescence of GFP drastically. In the biobrick [https://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K1319014 K1319014] this is | + | This protein is designed to be a dark quencher for GFP ([https://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_E0040 E0040]) in a FRET system. When used in a fusion protein with GFP it reduces the observed fluorescence of GFP drastically. In the biobrick [https://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K1319014 K1319014] this is realized and the proteins are fused with the linker [https://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K1319016 K1319016] which includes a specific TEV protease (available as [https://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K1319004 K1319004]) cleavage site. The fusion of the proteins brings GFP and REACh2 in proximity to each other which allows GFP and REACh2 to act as donors and acceptors in a FRET (Förster Energy Transfer System) system. GFPs emission energy is thereby taken up by REACh2 and released as thermal energy instead of visible light. This eliminates the GFP fluorescence and allows a release of a strong fluorescence signal if a TEV protease is expressed and the linker is cut. The cutting separates GFP and REACh2 cancelling the FRET interaction and providing a GFP fluorescence response. |
===Characterization=== | ===Characterization=== | ||
Line 23: | Line 23: | ||
<div class="figure" style="float:{{{align|center}}}; margin: 0px 10px 10px 0px; border:{{{border|0px solid #aaa}}};width:{{{width|800px}}};padding:10px 10px 0px 0px;"> | <div class="figure" style="float:{{{align|center}}}; margin: 0px 10px 10px 0px; border:{{{border|0px solid #aaa}}};width:{{{width|800px}}};padding:10px 10px 0px 0px;"> | ||
{| | {| | ||
− | |<html> <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/ | + | |<html> <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/parts/3/3e/Aachen_Graph2_14.PNG" width="800px"></html> |
|- | |- | ||
|'''{{{title|Comparison of the fluorescence adjusted for OD of I20260, B0015 and the double plasmid system K1319014 + K1319008}}}'''<br />{{{subtitle|After induction with IPTG after 2 h the double plasmid system produced a fast fluorescence response with an over 10-fold increase compared to the non induced state. I20260 served as positive control and B0015 as negative control.}}} | |'''{{{title|Comparison of the fluorescence adjusted for OD of I20260, B0015 and the double plasmid system K1319014 + K1319008}}}'''<br />{{{subtitle|After induction with IPTG after 2 h the double plasmid system produced a fast fluorescence response with an over 10-fold increase compared to the non induced state. I20260 served as positive control and B0015 as negative control.}}} | ||
Line 30: | Line 30: | ||
</center> | </center> | ||
<html></br></html> | <html></br></html> | ||
− | The strong fluorescence response (10-fold increase) after induction with IPTG shows the functionality of GFP inside the fusion protein. After the induction a TEV protease is produced which is specifically cutting the recognition sequence build inside the linker (K1319016) between GFP and K1319002. The cutting results in a separation of GFP and | + | The strong fluorescence response (10-fold increase) after induction with IPTG shows the functionality of GFP inside the fusion protein. After the induction a TEV protease is produced which is specifically cutting the recognition sequence build inside the linker (K1319016) between GFP and K1319002. The cutting results in a separation of GFP and REACh2 resulting in a collapse of the FRET system between the two. This results in a fluorescence signal of GFP due to the fact that the emission is no longer absorbed by REACh2 and emitted as heat but rather as fluorescence with a wavelength of 511 nm. The overall fluorescence of the double plasmid system reaches the fluorescence level of the positive control indicating a total clavage of all fusion proteins by the produced TEV protease. |
The very low fluorescence in the non induced double plasmid system of K1319014 and K1319008 shows the functionality of K1319002. As established before, the GFP is being expressed correctly inside the fusion protein, therefore the reduction in fluorescence in the non induced double plasmid system is a direct result of the quenching ability of K1319002. The quenching, after subtraction of the background fluorescence, reduced the fluorescence of GFP by a factor of 10. This also includes the slight leakiness of the TEV protease. | The very low fluorescence in the non induced double plasmid system of K1319014 and K1319008 shows the functionality of K1319002. As established before, the GFP is being expressed correctly inside the fusion protein, therefore the reduction in fluorescence in the non induced double plasmid system is a direct result of the quenching ability of K1319002. The quenching, after subtraction of the background fluorescence, reduced the fluorescence of GFP by a factor of 10. This also includes the slight leakiness of the TEV protease. | ||
Line 39: | Line 39: | ||
<div class="figure" style="float:{{{align|center}}}; margin: 0px 10px 10px 0px; border:{{{border|0px solid #aaa}}};width:{{{width|800px}}};padding:10px 10px 0px 0px;"> | <div class="figure" style="float:{{{align|center}}}; margin: 0px 10px 10px 0px; border:{{{border|0px solid #aaa}}};width:{{{width|800px}}};padding:10px 10px 0px 0px;"> | ||
{| | {| | ||
− | |<html> <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/ | + | |<html> <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/parts/4/44/Aachen_K1319002.PNG" width="800px"></html> |
|- | |- | ||
|'''{{{title|Comparison of the fluorescence adjusted for OD of I20260, B0015 and K1319014}}}'''<br />{{{subtitle|The expressed fusion protein K1319014 exhibits a fluorescence more than nearly 25-fold smaller as the positive control of I20260.}}} | |'''{{{title|Comparison of the fluorescence adjusted for OD of I20260, B0015 and K1319014}}}'''<br />{{{subtitle|The expressed fusion protein K1319014 exhibits a fluorescence more than nearly 25-fold smaller as the positive control of I20260.}}} | ||
Line 47: | Line 47: | ||
<html></br></html> | <html></br></html> | ||
− | This experiments shows that the fluorescence of the fusion protein GFP- | + | This experiments shows that the fluorescence of the fusion protein GFP-REACh2 is nearly 25-fold lower than normal GFP expression under identical circumstances (same backbone, promoter, RBS, terminator and cultivation circumstances). This demonstrates a quenching percentage of GFP of ~96 %! |
To prove that the measured constructs were the same as assumed the plasmids were tested with specially designed Check PCRs with one primer binding upstream on the plasmid backbone and one primer binding specifically inside the insert. The following results were obtained for K1319014. | To prove that the measured constructs were the same as assumed the plasmids were tested with specially designed Check PCRs with one primer binding upstream on the plasmid backbone and one primer binding specifically inside the insert. The following results were obtained for K1319014. | ||
Line 53: | Line 53: | ||
<div class="figure" style="float:{{{align|center}}}; margin: 0px 10px 10px 0px; border:{{{border|0px solid #aaa}}};width:{{{width|500px}}};padding:10px 10px 0px 0px;"> | <div class="figure" style="float:{{{align|center}}}; margin: 0px 10px 10px 0px; border:{{{border|0px solid #aaa}}};width:{{{width|500px}}};padding:10px 10px 0px 0px;"> | ||
{| | {| | ||
− | |<html> <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/ | + | |<html> <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/parts/0/08/Aachen_K1319014_Gel_Check_PCR.png" width="500px"></html> |
|- | |- | ||
|'''{{{title|Check PCR for K1319014}}}'''<br />{{{subtitle|The length of the PCR product matches the length of the control plasmid.}}} | |'''{{{title|Check PCR for K1319014}}}'''<br />{{{subtitle|The length of the PCR product matches the length of the control plasmid.}}} | ||
Line 65: | Line 65: | ||
<div class="figure" style="float:{{{align|center}}}; margin: 0px 10px 10px 0px; border:{{{border|0px solid #aaa}}};width:{{{width|500px}}};padding:10px 10px 0px 0px;"> | <div class="figure" style="float:{{{align|center}}}; margin: 0px 10px 10px 0px; border:{{{border|0px solid #aaa}}};width:{{{width|500px}}};padding:10px 10px 0px 0px;"> | ||
{| | {| | ||
− | |<html> <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/ | + | |<html> <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/parts/0/0c/Aachen_K1319008_Gel_Check_PCR.png" width="500px"></html> |
|- | |- | ||
|'''{{{title|Check PCR for K1319008}}}'''<br />{{{subtitle|The length of the PCR product matches the length of the control plasmid.}}} | |'''{{{title|Check PCR for K1319008}}}'''<br />{{{subtitle|The length of the PCR product matches the length of the control plasmid.}}} | ||
Line 79: | Line 79: | ||
<div class="figure" style="float:{{{align|center}}}; margin: 0px 10px 10px 40px; border:{{{border|0px solid #aaa}}};width:{{{width|500px}}};padding:10px 10px 0px 0px;"> | <div class="figure" style="float:{{{align|center}}}; margin: 0px 10px 10px 40px; border:{{{border|0px solid #aaa}}};width:{{{width|500px}}};padding:10px 10px 0px 0px;"> | ||
{| | {| | ||
− | |<html> <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/ | + | |<html> <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/parts/6/6d/Aachen_K1319014%2B8_and_K1319013%2B8_pixelig_minus_bg.gif" width="500px"></html> |
|- | |- | ||
− | |'''{{{title|K1319013 + K1319008 and K1319014 + K1319008 | + | |'''{{{title|K1319013 + K1319008 and K1319014 + K1319008 non-induced (top) and induced (bottom) in sensor cells }}}'''<br />{{{subtitle|The induced double plasmid systems K1319013 + K1319008 and K1319014 + K1319008 exhibit a clear fluorescence response in our sensor cells which in response to induction with 2 µl IPTG. }}} |
|} | |} | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
Line 88: | Line 88: | ||
To further characterize the REACh construct, they were introduced into the sensor cells which were then induced with 2 µL IPTG with a concentration of 100 mM. Subsequently, we took fluorescence measurement read-outs (GFP, excitation 496 ± 9 nm, emission 516 ± 9 nm) roughly every 10 min in the plate reader. The results were plotted in the heatmap shown on the left. | To further characterize the REACh construct, they were introduced into the sensor cells which were then induced with 2 µL IPTG with a concentration of 100 mM. Subsequently, we took fluorescence measurement read-outs (GFP, excitation 496 ± 9 nm, emission 516 ± 9 nm) roughly every 10 min in the plate reader. The results were plotted in the heatmap shown on the left. | ||
− | The heatmap shows an increase of fluorescence from blue (no fluorescence) to red (high fluorescence). It is clearly visible that the induced chips are exhibiting a significantly higher fluorescence than the | + | The heatmap shows an increase of fluorescence from blue (no fluorescence) to red (high fluorescence). It is clearly visible that the induced chips are exhibiting a significantly higher fluorescence than the non-induced chips. This again shows that the constructs work as intended: The TEV protease cuts the linker so that the fusion protein is separated into GFP and a dark quencher, disabling the quenching. GFP has a clear fluorescence emission after the fusion protein has been successfully cut into two pieces by the TEV protease. |
+ | ===Additional Characterisation=== | ||
+ | <b>Group</b>: Oxford iGEM 2017 <html></br></html> | ||
+ | <b>Author</b>: noahsprent <html></br></html> | ||
+ | <b>Summary</b>: We improved the characterisation of this part, by demonstrating in our part <html><a href="https://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K2450501"> (BBa_K2450501) </a> </html> that: <html></br></html> | ||
+ | <html> <ol> | ||
+ | <li>The action is not affected by upstream leader sequences, in our case allowing it to be targeted to Outer Membrane Vesicles </li> | ||
+ | <li>The action is not affected by the addition of a poly-his tag on the c-terminus, allowing for purification of the protein </li> | ||
+ | <li>The quencher also works with sfGFP, allowing it to be used in the periplasm </li> | ||
+ | </ol></html> | ||
+ | <html></br></html> | ||
+ | <b> Results: </b> | ||
+ | We ran both end-point analysis and time-course to see the effectiveness of relief and the dynamics of the reaction. | ||
+ | <html> <center> </html> | ||
+ | <html> <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/parts/e/ec/T--oxford--V200bar.png" width="400px"></html> <h6>End-point analysis of induction and cleavage. Cells were grown overnight in M9 media and subcultured down before being induced with arabinose at 0.1% w/v and IPTG. They were then allowed to run in a BMG CLARIOSTAR platereader for 10 hours. Three biological and technical repeats were averaged and the SEM used to make the error bars.</h6> | ||
+ | <html> <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/parts/a/af/T--Oxford--Results--V200Dynamics.png" width="520px"> | ||
+ | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/parts/4/4b/T--oxford--V200kinetics2.png" width="520px"></html> <h6>Figure 3: Graph showing the time-course of induction and cleavage. Conditions were the same as for Figure 4, above. The second graph shows error bars in dotted lines above and below each line, in the same colour.</h6> | ||
+ | <html> </center> </html> | ||
+ | As can be seen from the above graphs, when the plasmid containing our part <html><a href="https://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K2450501"> (BBa_K2450501) </a> </html> (sfGFP with the Reach 2 quencher) was co-transformed with a plasmid containing an IPTG-inducible TEV protease, induction of the protease relieved quenching. Click <html><a href="https://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K2450501"> here </a> </html> to visit the part page and read the characterisation in more detail, or visit our wiki page to learn more about the context of the part. | ||
<!-- --> | <!-- --> |
Latest revision as of 03:46, 2 November 2017
RFC[25]-compatible dark quencher based on K1319000 (E0030)
This part is a RFC[25] dark quencher that is based upon K1319000 (the RFC[25] version of E0030/EYFP) called REACh2.
Three mutations were introduced that eliminated fluorescence:
- L90I
- Y145W
- H148R
References
- Ganesan S, Ameer-Beg SM, Ng TT, Vojnovic B, Wouters FS. A dark yellow fluorescent protein (YFP)-based Resonance Energy-Accepting Chromoprotein (REACh) for Förster resonance energy transfer with GFP. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006 Mar 14;103(11):4089-94. Epub 2006 Mar 6. PubMed PMID: 16537489; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC1449651. [http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1449651/?report=classic PubMed Central]
Usage and Biology
This protein is designed to be a dark quencher for GFP (E0040) in a FRET system. When used in a fusion protein with GFP it reduces the observed fluorescence of GFP drastically. In the biobrick K1319014 this is realized and the proteins are fused with the linker K1319016 which includes a specific TEV protease (available as K1319004) cleavage site. The fusion of the proteins brings GFP and REACh2 in proximity to each other which allows GFP and REACh2 to act as donors and acceptors in a FRET (Förster Energy Transfer System) system. GFPs emission energy is thereby taken up by REACh2 and released as thermal energy instead of visible light. This eliminates the GFP fluorescence and allows a release of a strong fluorescence signal if a TEV protease is expressed and the linker is cut. The cutting separates GFP and REACh2 cancelling the FRET interaction and providing a GFP fluorescence response.
Characterization
In order to characterize K1319002 it was expressed as a fusion protein together with GFP to show its quenching ability. This fusion protein, produced by K1319014, was located on the plasmid backbone pSB3K3. To show that the reduced fluorescence was due to the quenching ability of K1319002 and not based on a faulty expression, K1319008 was also introduced into the cells on a pSB1C3 backbone to allow for a double plasmid system. Both constructs were put into E. coli BL21 (DE3) and compared to I20260 and B0015. B0015 was used as a negative control and I20260 was chosen as a positive control due to the expressed GFP being identical to the GFP being expressed in the fusion protein of K1319014 and having the same promoter, RBS, Terminator and plasmid backbone.
The double plasmid system, B0015 and I20260 were measured in biological triplicates and after 2 h one set of triplicates of each of the three systems were induced with 50 µl 100mM IPTG in their 50 ml culture (500 ml shake flasks). Fluorescence measurement was performed with the [http://www.biotek.com/products/microplate_detection/synergymx_monochromator_based_multimode_microplate_reader.html Synergy Mx from BioTek] with an excitation wavelength of 496 ± 9 nm and emission wavelength of 516 ± 9 nm. The following graph shows the resulting fluorescence adjusted for the measured optical density to account for difference in growth of the cultures and to only show the fluorescence per cell.
Comparison of the fluorescence adjusted for OD of I20260, B0015 and the double plasmid system K1319014 + K1319008 After induction with IPTG after 2 h the double plasmid system produced a fast fluorescence response with an over 10-fold increase compared to the non induced state. I20260 served as positive control and B0015 as negative control. |
The strong fluorescence response (10-fold increase) after induction with IPTG shows the functionality of GFP inside the fusion protein. After the induction a TEV protease is produced which is specifically cutting the recognition sequence build inside the linker (K1319016) between GFP and K1319002. The cutting results in a separation of GFP and REACh2 resulting in a collapse of the FRET system between the two. This results in a fluorescence signal of GFP due to the fact that the emission is no longer absorbed by REACh2 and emitted as heat but rather as fluorescence with a wavelength of 511 nm. The overall fluorescence of the double plasmid system reaches the fluorescence level of the positive control indicating a total clavage of all fusion proteins by the produced TEV protease.
The very low fluorescence in the non induced double plasmid system of K1319014 and K1319008 shows the functionality of K1319002. As established before, the GFP is being expressed correctly inside the fusion protein, therefore the reduction in fluorescence in the non induced double plasmid system is a direct result of the quenching ability of K1319002. The quenching, after subtraction of the background fluorescence, reduced the fluorescence of GFP by a factor of 10. This also includes the slight leakiness of the TEV protease.
To eliminate the effect of the leakiness of the K1319008 construct in determining the quenching ability of K1319002, K1319014 was also compared against I20260 and B0015 on its own under the same condition as above (again in a biological triplicate).
Comparison of the fluorescence adjusted for OD of I20260, B0015 and K1319014 The expressed fusion protein K1319014 exhibits a fluorescence more than nearly 25-fold smaller as the positive control of I20260. |
This experiments shows that the fluorescence of the fusion protein GFP-REACh2 is nearly 25-fold lower than normal GFP expression under identical circumstances (same backbone, promoter, RBS, terminator and cultivation circumstances). This demonstrates a quenching percentage of GFP of ~96 %!
To prove that the measured constructs were the same as assumed the plasmids were tested with specially designed Check PCRs with one primer binding upstream on the plasmid backbone and one primer binding specifically inside the insert. The following results were obtained for K1319014.
Check PCR for K1319014 The length of the PCR product matches the length of the control plasmid. |
The PCR clearly shows that the used plasmid had the correct insert. After a positive identification of K1319014 the double plasmid system was also checked for the correct TEV protease plasmid K1319008.
Check PCR for K1319008 The length of the PCR product matches the length of the control plasmid. |
This PCR also positively identified K1319008. Additionally both parts were sequenced. The sequencing data for K1319008 and K1319014 can be found in the parts registry.
characterization of K1319001 with the iGEM Team Aachen [http://2014.igem.org/Team:Aachen/Project/2D_Biosensor 2D Biosensor]
K1319013 + K1319008 and K1319014 + K1319008 non-induced (top) and induced (bottom) in sensor cells The induced double plasmid systems K1319013 + K1319008 and K1319014 + K1319008 exhibit a clear fluorescence response in our sensor cells which in response to induction with 2 µl IPTG. |
To further characterize the REACh construct, they were introduced into the sensor cells which were then induced with 2 µL IPTG with a concentration of 100 mM. Subsequently, we took fluorescence measurement read-outs (GFP, excitation 496 ± 9 nm, emission 516 ± 9 nm) roughly every 10 min in the plate reader. The results were plotted in the heatmap shown on the left.
The heatmap shows an increase of fluorescence from blue (no fluorescence) to red (high fluorescence). It is clearly visible that the induced chips are exhibiting a significantly higher fluorescence than the non-induced chips. This again shows that the constructs work as intended: The TEV protease cuts the linker so that the fusion protein is separated into GFP and a dark quencher, disabling the quenching. GFP has a clear fluorescence emission after the fusion protein has been successfully cut into two pieces by the TEV protease.
Additional Characterisation
Group: Oxford iGEM 2017 Author: noahsprent Summary: We improved the characterisation of this part, by demonstrating in our part (BBa_K2450501) that:
- The action is not affected by upstream leader sequences, in our case allowing it to be targeted to Outer Membrane Vesicles
- The action is not affected by the addition of a poly-his tag on the c-terminus, allowing for purification of the protein
- The quencher also works with sfGFP, allowing it to be used in the periplasm
End-point analysis of induction and cleavage. Cells were grown overnight in M9 media and subcultured down before being induced with arabinose at 0.1% w/v and IPTG. They were then allowed to run in a BMG CLARIOSTAR platereader for 10 hours. Three biological and technical repeats were averaged and the SEM used to make the error bars.
Figure 3: Graph showing the time-course of induction and cleavage. Conditions were the same as for Figure 4, above. The second graph shows error bars in dotted lines above and below each line, in the same colour.
As can be seen from the above graphs, when the plasmid containing our part (BBa_K2450501) (sfGFP with the Reach 2 quencher) was co-transformed with a plasmid containing an IPTG-inducible TEV protease, induction of the protease relieved quenching. Click here to visit the part page and read the characterisation in more detail, or visit our wiki page to learn more about the context of the part.
Sequence and Features
- 10COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[10]
- 12COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[12]
- 21COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[21]
- 23COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[23]
- 25COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[25]
- 1000COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[1000]