Difference between revisions of "Part:BBa J23107"

(iGEM 2020 QHFZ-China, new documentation (Bronze))
Line 18: Line 18:
  
 
<span id="QHFZ-China2020"><br><br><br><br><br></span>
 
<span id="QHFZ-China2020"><br><br><br><br><br></span>
==iGEM 2020 QHFZ-China, new documentation (Bronze)==
+
==iGEM 2020 QHFZ-China, new documentation (For Bronze)==
<p>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; We measured [https://parts.igem.org/BBa_J23100 BBa_J23100], [https://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_J23107 BBa_J23107] and [https://parts.igem.org/BBa_J23109 BBa_J23109] as a strong, moderate and weak promoter respectively in 2020. For all the experiments below, we use <i>E. coli</i> BL21(DE3) strain.</p>
+
<h3><b>Group: QHFZ-China iGEM 2020</b></h3>
 +
<h3><b>Author: Yixian Yang</b></h3>
 +
<p>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; We measured [https://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_J23100 BBa_J23100], [https://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_J23107 BBa_J23107] and [https://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_J23109 BBa_J23109] as a strong, moderate and weak promoter respectively in 2020. For all the experiments below, we use <i>E. coli</i> BL21(DE3) strain.</p>
 
<h3>Part 1: Measurement with a reprter, sfGFP</h3>
 
<h3>Part 1: Measurement with a reprter, sfGFP</h3>
 
<h4>Description</h4>
 
<h4>Description</h4>
<p>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;First, we measured the strength of the promoter by sfGFP [https://parts.igem.org/BBa_K3457015 BBa_K3457015].</p>
+
<p>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;First, we measured the strength of the promoter by sfGFP [https://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K3457015 BBa_K3457015].</p>
 
<h4>Protocol</h4>
 
<h4>Protocol</h4>
 
<p>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;The gene circuit we used is as below:</p>
 
<p>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;The gene circuit we used is as below:</p>
[[File:T--QHFZ-China--J2310-1.png|400px|thumb|left|Figure 1. The Schematic cartoon of the DNA construct to test J23100 /
+
[[File:T--QHFZ-China--J2310-1.png|600px|thumb|left|Figure 1. The Schematic cartoon of the DNA construct to test J23100 /
 
J23107 / J23109 with sfGFP.]]
 
J23107 / J23109 with sfGFP.]]
 
<p style="clear:left;">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;The protocol is as below: <br>
 
<p style="clear:left;">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;The protocol is as below: <br>
Line 39: Line 41:
 
</p>
 
</p>
 
<h4>Result</h4>
 
<h4>Result</h4>
[[File:T--QHFZ-China--sfGFP.jpg|400px|thumb|left|Figure 2. sfGFP was expressed with J23100 / J23107 / J23109.]]
+
[[File:T--QHFZ-China--sfGFP.jpg|600px|thumb|left|Figure 2. sfGFP was expressed with J23100 / J23107 / J23109.]]
 
<p style="clear:left;">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;We set the strehgth of J23109 as 1. The relative strengths of J23107 and J23109 were 4.4 and
 
<p style="clear:left;">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;We set the strehgth of J23109 as 1. The relative strengths of J23107 and J23109 were 4.4 and
 
     12.0. Though they are not the same as the data at the top of this page, they worked well anb the strength order of
 
     12.0. Though they are not the same as the data at the top of this page, they worked well anb the strength order of
Line 47: Line 49:
 
<h4>Description</h4>
 
<h4>Description</h4>
 
<p>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Second, we measured the strength of the promoter by CAHS 106094
 
<p>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Second, we measured the strength of the promoter by CAHS 106094
     [https://parts.igem.org/BBa_K3457012 BBa_K3457012]. This year, we used CAHS 106094 to protect bacteria from
+
     [https://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K3457012 BBa_K3457012]. This year, we used CAHS 106094 to protect bacteria from
 
     freeze-drying and dry storage. We used different promoters to adjust the expression level of CAHS 106094, to study
 
     freeze-drying and dry storage. We used different promoters to adjust the expression level of CAHS 106094, to study
 
     the relationship between the survival rate and CAHS 106094 expression level.</p>
 
     the relationship between the survival rate and CAHS 106094 expression level.</p>
 
<h4>Protocol</h4>
 
<h4>Protocol</h4>
 
<p>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;The gene circuit we used is as below:</p>
 
<p>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;The gene circuit we used is as below:</p>
[[File:T--QHFZ-China--J2310-2.png|400px|thumb|left|Figure 3. The Schematic cartoon of the DNA construct to test J23100 /
+
[[File:T--QHFZ-China--J2310-2.png|600px|thumb|left|Figure 3. The Schematic cartoon of the DNA construct to test J23100 /
 
J23107 / J23109 with sfGFP.]]
 
J23107 / J23109 with sfGFP.]]
 
<p style="clear:left;">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;The protocol is as below: </p>
 
<p style="clear:left;">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;The protocol is as below: </p>
[[File:T--QHFZ-China--freeze-dry protocol.jpg|400px|thumb|left|Figure 4. Experiment protocol.]]
+
[[File:T--QHFZ-China--freeze-dry protocol.jpg|600px|thumb|left|Figure 4. Experiment protocol.]]
 
<p style="clear:left;">
 
<p style="clear:left;">
 
     【Day 1】Induction culture<br>
 
     【Day 1】Induction culture<br>
Line 92: Line 94:
 
</p>
 
</p>
 
<h4>Result</h4>
 
<h4>Result</h4>
[[File:T--QHFZ-China--J2310-3.png|400px|thumb|left|Figure 5. The Cfu of bacteria expressing CAHS 106094 after
+
[[File:T--QHFZ-China--J2310-3.png|600px|thumb|left|Figure 5. The Cfu of bacteria expressing CAHS 106094 after
 
freeze-drying with J23100 / J23107 / J23109.]]
 
freeze-drying with J23100 / J23107 / J23109.]]
 
<p style="clear:left;">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;As expected, J23100 is the strongest promoter and it gave the best survival rate. J23107 is
 
<p style="clear:left;">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;As expected, J23100 is the strongest promoter and it gave the best survival rate. J23107 is
Line 98: Line 100:
 
     in this situation, but J23109 is not.</p>
 
     in this situation, but J23109 is not.</p>
 
     <!-- The end of QHFZ-China 2020-->
 
     <!-- The end of QHFZ-China 2020-->
 +
 
==USTC_2009's MEASUREMENT==
 
==USTC_2009's MEASUREMENT==
 
[https://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K176013 K176013]
 
[https://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K176013 K176013]

Revision as of 08:49, 26 October 2020

constitutive promoter family member

BerkiGEM2006-PromotersEppendorfs.jpg
BerkiGEM2006-Promoters.jpg

 Variant RFP (au)
 J23112           1
 J23103           17
 J23113           21
 J23109           106
 J23117           162
 J23114           256
 J23115           387
 J23116           396
 J23105           623
 J23110           844
 J23107           908
 J23106           1185
 J23108           1303
 J23118           1429
 J23111           1487
 J23101           1791
 J23104           1831
 J23102           2179
 J23100           2547
PBca1020-r0040.jpg

Constitutive promoter family
Parts J23100 through J23119 are a family of constitutive promoter parts isolated from a small combinatorial library. J23119 is the "consensus" promoter sequence and the strongest member of the family. All parts except J23119 are present in plasmid J61002. Part J23119 is present in pSB1A2. This places the RFP downstream of the promoter. Reported activities of the promoters are given as the relative fluorescence of these plasmids in strain TG1 grown in LB media to saturation. See part BBa_J61002 for details on their use.

These promoter parts can be used to tune the expression level of constitutively expressed parts. The NheI and AvrII restriction sites present within these promoter parts make them a scaffold for further modification. JCAraw

Sequence and Features


Assembly Compatibility:
  • 10
    COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[10]
  • 12
    INCOMPATIBLE WITH RFC[12]
    Illegal NheI site found at 7
    Illegal NheI site found at 30
  • 21
    COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[21]
  • 23
    COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[23]
  • 25
    COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[25]
  • 1000
    COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[1000]







iGEM 2020 QHFZ-China, new documentation (For Bronze)

Group: QHFZ-China iGEM 2020

Author: Yixian Yang

     We measured BBa_J23100, BBa_J23107 and BBa_J23109 as a strong, moderate and weak promoter respectively in 2020. For all the experiments below, we use E. coli BL21(DE3) strain.

Part 1: Measurement with a reprter, sfGFP

Description

    First, we measured the strength of the promoter by sfGFP BBa_K3457015.

Protocol

    The gene circuit we used is as below:

Figure 1. The Schematic cartoon of the DNA construct to test J23100 / J23107 / J23109 with sfGFP.

    The protocol is as below:
(1) Pick clones which are in good condition and put them into 500 μL LB medium containing antibiotics. Shake them to grow at 37℃ for 5~7 hours until the bacteria solution becomes turbid.
(2) Add 2mM iPTG into 3 mL LB medium containing antibiotics. Add 3 μL of the bacteria solution mentioned in step 1 to dilute the bacteria by the ratio of 1:1000. Shake the solution to grow the bacteria at 37℃ overnight.
(3) The bacteria solution was centrifuged and the LB medium was removed. Then the bacteria was resuspended by PBS. 100 μL such solution was put into a well of a 96-well palte. The GFP fluorescence and OD600 were detected by a microplate readers (Bio-Teck). The parameters are: exciting light: 488 nm, light reception: 520 nm, gain: 50.
(4) The value of PBS was deducted from the result above. GFP / OD600 was calculated.

Result

Figure 2. sfGFP was expressed with J23100 / J23107 / J23109.

    We set the strehgth of J23109 as 1. The relative strengths of J23107 and J23109 were 4.4 and 12.0. Though they are not the same as the data at the top of this page, they worked well anb the strength order of the three promoters was accordance was consistent with other people's data. The difference may owe to the certain gene circuit and protocol.

Part 2: Measurement with CHAS 106094

Description

    Second, we measured the strength of the promoter by CAHS 106094 BBa_K3457012. This year, we used CAHS 106094 to protect bacteria from freeze-drying and dry storage. We used different promoters to adjust the expression level of CAHS 106094, to study the relationship between the survival rate and CAHS 106094 expression level.

Protocol

    The gene circuit we used is as below:

Figure 3. The Schematic cartoon of the DNA construct to test J23100 / J23107 / J23109 with sfGFP.

    The protocol is as below:

Figure 4. Experiment protocol.

【Day 1】Induction culture
(1) Pick clones which are in good condition and put them into 500 μL LB medium containing antibiotics. Shake them to grow at 37℃ for 5~7 hours until the bacteria solution becomes turbid.
(2) Add 2mM iPTG into 3 mL LB medium containing antibiotics. Add 3 μL of the bacteria solution mentioned in step 1 to dilute the bacteria by the ratio of 1:1000. Shake the solution to grow the bacteria at 37℃ overnight.
【Day 2】Freeze-dried
(1) If fluorescence induced by the iPTG is detectable in the control group (GFP), continue conducting the experiment.
(2) Use spectrophotometer to measure the OD600 of the bacteria solution, OD600 = 1 equals to 109 cells. If the OD600 value is between 0.1 and 1, There is a linear relationship between OD600 and bacterial density. Calculate the volume of bacterial solution for 109 cells by using the formula V = 100 / (OD600 × Dilution ratio).
(3) Take out a measured amount of 109 cells and centrifuge it at 8000 rpm for 3 min. Then pour out the supernatant.
(4) Resuspend the bacteria in a 15 mL tube with pre-refrigerated 100 μL 3% glucose solution.
(5) Take off the cover of the tube and put the bacteria into the cold trap. Open the compressor of the lyophilization machine and freeze the shake tube for 2 h at -70℃.
(6) Put the caky bacteria solution into the drying chamber of the lyophilization machine. Open the vacuum pump to dry it in vacuum for 6h at 1 Pa vacuum degree.
(7) Turn off the vacuum pump, place it at seal box filled with silica-gel desiccant a for 2 days at room temperature.
【Day 3】Room temperature storage
【Day 4】Detect the survival rate
(1) Add 1 mL of sterile water to the tube, vortex for 15 s, placed it at room temperature for 10 min.
(2) Adjust the density of the bacteria solution by gradient dilution, then spread 100 μL of the bacteria solution on the LB plate.
(3) If the density above is not suitable, take 100μL of the solution and spread it on the LB plate after several gradient dilutions.
(4) Culture the bacteria overnight at 37℃.
【Day 5】Cell Count
(1) Take out the LB plate and take photos to record experimental results.
(2) Use the automatic cell counting function of Image J to count the colone number on the LB plate, then compare the results between each group.

Result

Figure 5. The Cfu of bacteria expressing CAHS 106094 after freeze-drying with J23100 / J23107 / J23109.

    As expected, J23100 is the strongest promoter and it gave the best survival rate. J23107 is the second and J23109 seemed too weak to express enough CAHS 106094. In conclusion, J23100 and J23107 is effective in this situation, but J23109 is not.

USTC_2009's MEASUREMENT

K176013


•••••

University of Texas at Austin iGEM 2019

UT Austin iGEM 2019: Characterization of metabolic burden of the Anderson Series

Description

The 2019 UT Austin iGEM team transformed the Anderson Series promoters into our 'burden monitor' DH10B strain of E. coli, which contains a constitutive GFP cassette in the genome of the cell. GFP expression fluctuates depending on the number of ribosomes available. Using this strain, we characterized the relative burden (percent reduction in growth rate) of each Anderson Series part. Our results showed a range of growth rate reductions for each of these parts due to ribosomal reallocation from the genome of the host cell, towards the expression of RFP. Anderson Series parts with strong promoters are depicted with darker red colors and Anderson Series parts with weak promoters are depicted with lighter pink colors to show relative RFP expression. We saw a positive correlation between relative promoter strength and metabolic burden; parts with stronger promoters expressed less GFP and had a lower growth rate than parts with weaker promoters. The regression line for the graph below was constructed by measuring the burden of 5 parts that were created by the 2019 UT Austin iGEM team that each contained an Anderson Series promoter (BBa_J23104 or BBa_J23110), an RBS of varying strength, and a BFP reporter. For more information on characterization of these parts through the burden monitor, visit our team’s wiki page: [1]

Fig.1:Growth vs GFP Expression graph showing the relative burden positions of the Anderson Series promoters. The parts with strong promoters are depicted in dark red and are clustered near the bottom of the graph because they have lower growth rates and express lower levels of GFP as a result of high cellular burden. The parts with weaker promoter are depicted in light pink ad are clustered near the top of the graph because they have higher growth rates and express higher levels of GFP as a result of low cellular burden.


Table.1: Burden measurements for the Anderson Series promoters measured as percent reduction in growth rate ± 95% confidence interval.

Importance of Characterizing Burden

Although often we cannot avoid using a specific burdensome part, knowing in advance that it is burdensome, and that it has a high chance of mutating into a non-functional genetic device, can help with troubleshooting and coming up with alternatives. In the specific case of fluorescent protein-expressing devices, Fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS) can be used to filter out individual cells that meet a certain fluorescence threshold. This way, the cells expressing lower levels of the fluorescent protein are weeded out of the population.