Difference between revisions of "Part:BBa K2992025"

(Characterisation)
(Characterisation)
 
(5 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 8: Line 8:
 
===Characterisation===
 
===Characterisation===
  
In order to ensure the suitability of P<i>botR</i> for driving the expression of BotR in our volatile reporter strain, we first assessed it’s promoter activity using the fluorescent reporter for anaerobic organisms, FAST [https://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K2992002 BBa_K2992002]. We compared promoter activities of our chosen promoters P<i>botR</i> [https://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K2992012 BBa_K2992012] and P<i>ntnH</i> [https://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K2992001 BBa_K2992001]alongside three constitutive clostridial promoters P<i>fdxc114t</i>[https://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K2992016 BBa_K2992016], P<i>fdxt114c</i> [https://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K2715011 BBa_ K2715011] and P<i>thl</i> [https://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K2715010 BBa_ K2715010]  and the <i>E. coli</i>  promoter J23106 [https://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_J23106 BBa_ J23106]. The plasmids were cloned upstream of the FAST reporter gene and ligated into pMTL82151 plasmids. FAST reporter assays were conducted on both <i>E. coli</i> and <i>C. sporogenes</i> lysates following transfer of genetic material thereto.   
+
In order to ensure the suitability of P<i>botR</i> for driving the expression of BotR in our volatile reporter strain, we first assessed it’s promoter activity using the fluorescent reporter for anaerobic organisms, FAST [https://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K2992002 BBa_K2992002]. We compared promoter activities of our chosen promoters P<i>botR</i> [https://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K2992012 BBa_K2992012] and P<i>ntnH</i> [https://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K2992001 BBa_K2992001] alongside three constitutive clostridial promoters P<i>fdxc114t</i> [https://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K2992016 BBa_K2992016], P<i>fdxt114c</i> [https://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K2715011 BBa_ K2715011] and P<i>thl</i> [https://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K2715010 BBa_ K2715010]  and the <i>E. coli</i>  promoter J23106 [https://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_J23106 BBa_ J23106]. The plasmids were cloned upstream of the FAST reporter gene and ligated into pMTL82151 plasmids. FAST reporter assays were conducted on both <i>E. coli</i> and <i>C. sporogenes</i> lysates following transfer of genetic material thereto.   
  
 
[[File:FAST.png]]
 
[[File:FAST.png]]
  
In the <i>C. sporogenes</i> experiments, adequate expression was detected for each of the clostridial promoters chosen for study. The two P<i>fdx</i> derivatives generated the greatest level of reporter activity whilst the two <i>C. botulinum</i> promoters generates much lower levels of activity. Reporter activity appeared to be generally higher when analysed from the <i>E. coli</i> lysates as opposed to the <i>C. sporogenes</i> lysates. In those experiments, activity from the P<i>botR</i> and P<i>ntnh</i> constructs were considerably greater than the no promoter control.  
+
In the <i>C. sporogenes</i> experiments, adequate expression was detected for each of the clostridial promoters chosen for study. The two P<i>fdx</i> derivatives generated the greatest level of reporter activity whilst the two <i>C. botulinum</i> promoters generated much lower levels of activity. Reporter activity appeared to be generally higher when analysed from the <i>E. coli</i> lysates as opposed to the <i>C. sporogenes</i> lysates. In those experiments, activity from the P<i>botR</i> and P<i>ntnh</i> constructs were considerably greater than the no promoter control.  
  
  
  
P<i>botR</i> was next assessed using the GusA reporter assay following genomic integration of the various promoter-<i>botR</i> constructs at the <i>pyrE</i> locus. Promoter-<i>gusA</i> construct were transferred into <i>C. sporogenes</i> on pMTL-82121 plasmids.  
+
P<i>botR</i> was next assessed using the GusA reporter assay following genomic integration of the various promoter-<i>botR</i> constructs at the <i>pyrE</i> locus. Promoter-<i>gusA</i> constructs were transferred into <i>C. sporogenes</i> on pMTL-82121 plasmids.
  
 
[[File:GusA botR.png]]
 
[[File:GusA botR.png]]
  
In a similar fashion to the FAST assays, P<i>fdx</i> provided the greatest level of promoter activity. P<i>botR</i> generated a medium level of reporter activity which was marginally better than the promoterless construct permitting polar transcription from P<i>pyrKDE</i>. Crucially, the P<i>botR</i> construct was incapable of generated detectable reporter activity in the absence of genomic <i>botR</i>. Collectively these data indicate sufficient activity of PbotR and demonstrate the critical activation of P<i>botR</i> by the sigma factor BotR.   
+
In a similar fashion to the FAST assays, P<i>fdx</i> provided the greatest level of promoter activity. P<i>botR</i> generated a medium level of reporter activity which was marginally better than the promoterless construct permitting polar transcription from P<i>pyrKDE</i>. Crucially, the P<i>botR</i> construct was incapable of generated detectable reporter activity in the absence of genomic <i>botR</i> (green lines vs red lines). Collectively these data indicate sufficient activity of P<i>botR</i> and demonstrate the critical activation of P<i>botR</i> by the sigma factor BotR.  Taken together, we conclude that the <i>botR</i> integration constructs should be applicable for acetone production studies. <br><br>
<br>
+
  
Finally the <i>botR</i> integrants and their controls were assessed for their ability to induce acetone production in our volatile reporter strains. The acetone production pathway csp_Pfdx-5-UTR+RBS-ca_thl-cb_ctfAB-cp_TFdx [https://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K2992035 BBa_K2992035] was chosen for this purpose. The construct contained on pMTL82151 was transformed into the various promoter-<i>botR</i> genome integrant and control strains.
+
Finally, the <i>botR</i> integrants and their controls were assessed for their ability to induce acetone production in our volatile reporter strains. The acetone production pathway csp_Pfdx-5-UTR+RBS-ca_thl-cb_ctfAB-cp_TFdx [https://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K2992035 BBa_K2992035] was chosen for this purpose. The construct contained on pMTL82151 was transformed into the various promoter-<i>botR</i> genome integrant and control strains.  
  
 
[[File:Acetone data.png]]
 
[[File:Acetone data.png]]
  
The data demonstrated appreciable acetone production of >2nM concentration when using either the native P<i>botR</i> promoter and associated 5’-UTR+RBS or the RBS only construct to permit polar transcription from PpyrKDE</i>. Considerable acetone production (4-6nM) was observed when using the constitutive clostridial promoter P<i>fdx</i>. Crucially acetone production was comparably scant when <i>botR</i> was absent from the genome of <i>C. sporogenes</i> and when no promoter was used to drive expression of the acetone production operon. These data provide experimental validation for the production of acetone in <i>C. sporogenes</i> as a model for Botulinum toxin prediction in foodstuffs.  
+
The data demonstrated appreciable acetone production of >2nM concentration when using either the native P<i>botR</i> promoter and associated 5’-UTR+RBS or the RBS only construct to permit polar transcription from P<i>pyrKDE</i>. Considerable acetone production (4-6nM) was observed when using the constitutive clostridial promoter P<i>fdx</i>. Crucially, acetone production was comparably scant when <i>botR</i> was absent from the genome of <i>C. sporogenes</i> and when no promoter was used to drive expression of the acetone production operon. These data provide experimental validation for the production of acetone in <i>C. sporogenes</i> as a model for Botulinum toxin prediction in foodstuffs.  
 +
 
 +
  
  
Line 35: Line 36:
  
 
===References===  
 
===References===  
Cañadas et al., 2019 RiboCas – update
+
 
Dupuy  and Matamouros, 2006 update
+
Cañadas, I., Groothuis, D., Zygouropoulou, M., Rodrigues, R. and Minton, N. (2019). RiboCas: A Universal CRISPR-Based Editing Tool for Clostridium. ACS Synthetic Biology, 8(6), pp.1379-1390.
Minton et al., 2016 Road map – update
+
 
Raffestin et al 2009 update
+
Hartman, A., Liu, H. and Melville, S. (2010). Construction and Characterization of a Lactose-Inducible Promoter System for Controlled Gene Expression inClostridium perfringens. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 77(2), pp.471-478.
 +
 
 +
Dupuy, B., Raffestin, S., Matamouros, S., Mani, N., Popoff, M. and Sonenshein, A. (2006). Regulation of toxin and bacteriocin gene expression in Clostridium by interchangeable RNA polymerase sigma factors. Molecular Microbiology, 60(4), pp.1044-1057.
 +
 
  
  

Latest revision as of 15:04, 21 October 2019


botR integration module for C. sporogenes with native promoter, 5-UTR+RBS

Usage and Biology

This parts entry represents an integration module for the expression of botR from the pyrE locus of the C. sporogenes genome. This module comprises a strong clostridial terminator sequence Tfad to prevent polar transcription from pyrD BBa_K2992013 and the botR gene of C. botulinum BBa_K2992002, under the regulatory control of its native promoter PbotR BBa_K2992012 and its associated 5’-UTR which contains the RBS BBa_K2992014. An additional strong clostridial terminator was included to prevent polar transcription of pyrE and any downstream genes on the chromosome of C. sporogenesBBa_K2284012. In our project we use the transcriptional regulator of neurotoxin production from C. botulinum, BotR, to control the regulation of our volatile reporter operons (hyperlink to comp parts) and our fluorescent reporter FAST BBa_K2992000 through interaction with its own promoter sequence PbotrR BBa_k299012 and PntnH BBa_K2992001 whose genes are cognate members of the BotR regulon. Doing so allows us to use our surrogate host strain C. sporogenes as a model system for predicting botulinum neurotoxin production following food manufacture, through the detection of our chosen reporters.

Characterisation

In order to ensure the suitability of PbotR for driving the expression of BotR in our volatile reporter strain, we first assessed it’s promoter activity using the fluorescent reporter for anaerobic organisms, FAST BBa_K2992002. We compared promoter activities of our chosen promoters PbotR BBa_K2992012 and PntnH BBa_K2992001 alongside three constitutive clostridial promoters Pfdxc114t BBa_K2992016, Pfdxt114c BBa_ K2715011 and Pthl BBa_ K2715010 and the E. coli promoter J23106 BBa_ J23106. The plasmids were cloned upstream of the FAST reporter gene and ligated into pMTL82151 plasmids. FAST reporter assays were conducted on both E. coli and C. sporogenes lysates following transfer of genetic material thereto.

FAST.png

In the C. sporogenes experiments, adequate expression was detected for each of the clostridial promoters chosen for study. The two Pfdx derivatives generated the greatest level of reporter activity whilst the two C. botulinum promoters generated much lower levels of activity. Reporter activity appeared to be generally higher when analysed from the E. coli lysates as opposed to the C. sporogenes lysates. In those experiments, activity from the PbotR and Pntnh constructs were considerably greater than the no promoter control.


PbotR was next assessed using the GusA reporter assay following genomic integration of the various promoter-botR constructs at the pyrE locus. Promoter-gusA constructs were transferred into C. sporogenes on pMTL-82121 plasmids.

GusA botR.png

In a similar fashion to the FAST assays, Pfdx provided the greatest level of promoter activity. PbotR generated a medium level of reporter activity which was marginally better than the promoterless construct permitting polar transcription from PpyrKDE. Crucially, the PbotR construct was incapable of generated detectable reporter activity in the absence of genomic botR (green lines vs red lines). Collectively these data indicate sufficient activity of PbotR and demonstrate the critical activation of PbotR by the sigma factor BotR. Taken together, we conclude that the botR integration constructs should be applicable for acetone production studies.

Finally, the botR integrants and their controls were assessed for their ability to induce acetone production in our volatile reporter strains. The acetone production pathway csp_Pfdx-5-UTR+RBS-ca_thl-cb_ctfAB-cp_TFdx BBa_K2992035 was chosen for this purpose. The construct contained on pMTL82151 was transformed into the various promoter-botR genome integrant and control strains.

Acetone data.png

The data demonstrated appreciable acetone production of >2nM concentration when using either the native PbotR promoter and associated 5’-UTR+RBS or the RBS only construct to permit polar transcription from PpyrKDE. Considerable acetone production (4-6nM) was observed when using the constitutive clostridial promoter Pfdx. Crucially, acetone production was comparably scant when botR was absent from the genome of C. sporogenes and when no promoter was used to drive expression of the acetone production operon. These data provide experimental validation for the production of acetone in C. sporogenes as a model for Botulinum toxin prediction in foodstuffs.



Sequence and Features


Assembly Compatibility:
  • 10
    COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[10]
  • 12
    COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[12]
  • 21
    COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[21]
  • 23
    COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[23]
  • 25
    COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[25]
  • 1000
    COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[1000]

References

Cañadas, I., Groothuis, D., Zygouropoulou, M., Rodrigues, R. and Minton, N. (2019). RiboCas: A Universal CRISPR-Based Editing Tool for Clostridium. ACS Synthetic Biology, 8(6), pp.1379-1390.

Hartman, A., Liu, H. and Melville, S. (2010). Construction and Characterization of a Lactose-Inducible Promoter System for Controlled Gene Expression inClostridium perfringens. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 77(2), pp.471-478.

Dupuy, B., Raffestin, S., Matamouros, S., Mani, N., Popoff, M. and Sonenshein, A. (2006). Regulation of toxin and bacteriocin gene expression in Clostridium by interchangeable RNA polymerase sigma factors. Molecular Microbiology, 60(4), pp.1044-1057.