Revision as of 02:50, 19 September 2015

J23117-lldRO1-lldRO2 Sequence and Features

Collection of promoters regulated by LldR. Check also: BBa_K1847008 BBa_K1847007 BBa_K1847009

We are grateful to Stockholm iGEM 2015 for their help with the characterization!

Usage and Biology

Figure 1. Theoretical model for the dual function as repressor and activator of LldR.

The natural promoter of LldR (Part:BBa_K822000) consists of two operators (O1 and O2) and a promoter which is intercalated between the operators. It regulates the expression of the lldPRD operon, and it is involved in L-lactate metabolism. This promoter is repressed by a dimer of LldR, possibly by forming a DNA loop that does not allow the RNA polymerase to bind to the promoter. LldR can also have a function as an activator [1]. The repression of the promoter can be removed by lactate.

Characterization of the promoter

We wanted to know how the promoter would respond to the lactate presence and how important is the architecture of the promoter in this response. For this regard, we built several promoters. Part:BBa_K1847002, Part:BBa_K1847003, Part:BBa_K1847004, Part:BBa_K1847005, Part:BBa_K1847006, Part:BBa_K1847007, Part:BBa_K1847008, and Part:BBa_K1847009.

Genetic design for characterization with LldR

To test our promoter we designed a plasmid containing the promoter with sfGFP in a medium copy plasmid pSEVA261 and transformed it into Escherichia coli TOP10. Then, we added a second plasmid containing lldR with a medium strong promoter (Part:BBa_J23118) and a strong RBS (Part:BBa_B0034) in pSEVA371 backbone. According to literature [1], LldR will repress the promoter and by the addition of lactate the production of GFP will start, as the repressor will be removed.

Genetic design for characterization with LldP-LldP

The second step for our characterization was to add an L-lactate permease (LldP), which despite its name is an active transporter of L-lactate, D-lactate and glycolate. To understand the effect of LldP (L-lactatep permease) in our system, we tried the following conditions:

• Plasmid with the promoter and sfGFP in medium copy number plasmid+ J23114-B0032-lldP-lldR (LldP and LldR are under the control of the same low promoter) in low copy number plasmid
• Plasmid with the promoter and sfGFP in medium copy number plasmid + J23118-B0032-lldP-lldR (LldP and LldR are under the control of the same medium promoter) in low copy number plasmid

Plate reader

E. coli TOP10 strains were grown overnight in Lysogeny Broth (LB) containing kanamycin (1 µg/mL) and chloramphenicol (0.36 µg/mL) at 37°C and 200 rpm. Cultures were diluted 1:50 in fresh LB with the corresponding antibiotic and transferred to a 96-well plate (200 µL/well). Cultures were grown for 90 min to arrive to exponential phase and then different concentrations of lactate were added. Samples were always made in triplicates and a blank of LB with the corresponding lactate concentration was done. During 7 h the absorbance at OD600 and fluorescence (excitation 488 nm and emission 530 nm) were measured with intervals of 7 min. The plate was always kept at 37°C in a plate reader. We calculated dose-response curves from the exponential phase of the bacteria using normalized fluorescence corrected by optical density.

Data

Figure 2. Dose-response curves for the promoters with the following architecture: promoter-O1-O2.

In Figure 2 we can see that the lactate influences the promoter in a low fashion, with an ON/OFF ratio of about 1.2 for each one of them.