Part:BBa_K747099
Eukaryotic TAL expression plasmid
Once the MammoBrick was ready, we inserted the TAL open reading frame and thereby evaluated, how easy it would be for future iGEM students to insert any desired ORF in eukaryotic cells.
Designing the TAL open reading frame:
For this purpose, we designed a TAL ORF by adding the following modifications to the TAL open reading frame in [http://www.everyvector.com/sequences/show_public/18260 pTALEN_(v2)_NG]:
1. We removed all EcoRI, XbaI, SpeI, PstI, BsmBI, BbsI and PmeI restriction sites.
2. We replaced the BsaI restriction sites for inserting direpeats by BsmBI sites, because – according to the manufacturer - BsmBI is better suited for digest over one hour.
3. We added a consensus RBS in front of the ORF for expression in bacteria
4. We added a His-Tag to the n-terminal end to allow protein purification.
5. We flanked the whole sequence with the iGEM prefix and suffix.
6. Most importantly, we replaced the FokI nuclease at the C-terminal end of the protein by one of our inventions: The Plug and Play Effector Cassette.
This whole construct was synthesized by IDT.
Plug and Play Effecor Cassette: Our project was designed to enable future iGEM teams to easily use the powerful TALE technology. On top of that, we wanted to built a TALE platform which allows iGEM students to freely develop their own TAL constructs. We therefore invented the easy-to-use Plug and Play Effector Cassette (PPEC), which can be used to fuse BioBricks, that are in the [http://2012.igem.org/Team:Freiburg/Project/Golden Golden Gate standard], to the c-terminus of the TAL protein.
The PPEC consists of two BbsI binding sites that point in opposite directions. Digestion with BbsI leads to removal of the PPEC and to the formation of sticky ends at which the upstream sticky end (GGCA) are the last 4 nucleotides of the tal protein and the downstream sticky end (TAAA) contains the stop codon. When an equimolar amount of the effector containing plasmid (flanked also by BbsI sites and the same overlaps) is added to the GGC mix, the effector is cut out of the iGEM vector and ligated into the eukaryotic TAL expression vector in-frame and without a scar. We have optimized this reaction by systematically testing different reaction buffers and thermocycler programs and came up with the following
protocol:
Component | Amount (μl) |
---|---|
BpiI/BbsI (15 U) | 0,75 |
T4 Ligase (400 U) | 1 |
DTT (10 mM) | 1 |
ATP (10 mM) | 11,5 |
G-Buffer (10x, Fermentas) | 1 |
parts | 40 fmoles each |
ddH2O | Fill up to 10 |
Total | 10 |
Thermocycler programm: |
---|
1. 37°C, 5 min |
2. 20 °C, 5 min |
go back to 1. 20 times |
4. 50°C, 10 min |
5. 80°C, 10 min |
5. 4°C, ∞ |
But even Golden Gate cloning is not 100 % efficient. In order to remove those plasmids that did not take up a vector insert, we added the restriction site of the blunt end cutter PmeI (MssI) to the PPEC. We chose PmeI because it has a 8 bp binding site, which is very unlikely to occur in the gene of an effector that you would like to fuse with the TAL gene. So after performing the Golden Gate reaction described above, we digested with MssI fast digest (fermentas) according to the following protocol.
Component | Amount (μl) |
---|---|
GGC-Product | 10 |
PmeI/MssI FastDigest | 1 |
Fast Digest Buffer (10x) | 1,5 |
ddH2O | 2,5 |
Total | 15 |
Thermocycler programm: |
---|
1. 37°C, 1h |
2. 80 °C, 20 min |
5. 4°C, ∞ |
This linearizes all vectors that do not contain the effector (at least, we do not see colonies on the negative control plate). To be sure, these linearized vectors do not religate, perform the following digest with T5 exonuclease, which specifically removes linearized DNA:
Component | Amount (μl) |
---|---|
Product of PmeI digest | 7,5 |
T5 Exonuclease | 1 |
Total | 8,5 |
Thermocycler programm: |
---|
1. 37°C, 1h |
2. 80 °C, 20 min |
5. 4°C, ∞ |
Usage and Biology
Gene activation
Experimental design
The experiment was done with four different transfections, either no plasmid, only the TAL vector, only the SEAP plasmid or a cotransfection of both plasmids. The cells were seeded on a twelve well plate the day before in 500µl culture media per well. The transfection was done with CaCl2.
Activation of transcription
As it is observable in the graph, co-transfection of cells with TAL and SEAP plasmids(++) yielded a high increase in SEAP activity, compared to the control samples. Also the control experiment with a TAL-VP64 targeting a random sequence shows the specificity of our system. The graph shows the average value of three biological replicates with its standard deviation. We further performed a t-test (Table) to prove if our experiment is statistically significant. As it is clearly observable, the p-values range below a value of 0,05, which indicates that our TAL transcription factor is able to elevate the transcription of the SEAP gene in a statistically significant manner.
After addition of pNPP, the substrate of SEAP, the activity of SEAP was measured over time. In the next image, the results of the first nine minutes of this measurement are shown. After this time, the OD of the double transfection (++) rose too high to be measured by our photometer. As it is clearly visible, the sample with the double transfection shows a profound increase in the OD. This points to the fact that great amounts of SEAP have been secreted into the cell culture media due to elevated gene expression. In the other samples almost no SEAP activity was measureable. The sample transfected with only the SEAP plasmid showed the highest OD but this effect was not statistically significant (p-value:0,25/0,51).
In the samples that had been taken 48h after double transfection, the same effects could be demonstrated.
Furthermore, we reapeated the same experiment for a second time. The corresponding data can be viewed here:
Sequence and Features
- 10INCOMPATIBLE WITH RFC[10]Illegal prefix found in sequence at 966
Illegal suffix found in sequence at 3901 - 12INCOMPATIBLE WITH RFC[12]Illegal EcoRI site found at 966
Illegal SpeI site found at 3902
Illegal PstI site found at 3916
Illegal NotI site found at 972
Illegal NotI site found at 2146
Illegal NotI site found at 3909 - 21INCOMPATIBLE WITH RFC[21]Illegal EcoRI site found at 966
Illegal BglII site found at 1563
Illegal BglII site found at 2914
Illegal BamHI site found at 2217
Illegal BamHI site found at 2920 - 23INCOMPATIBLE WITH RFC[23]Illegal prefix found in sequence at 966
Illegal suffix found in sequence at 3902 - 25INCOMPATIBLE WITH RFC[25]Illegal prefix found in sequence at 966
Illegal XbaI site found at 981
Illegal SpeI site found at 3902
Illegal PstI site found at 3916 - 1000COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[1000]
None |