Coding

Part:BBa_K1974002

Designed by: YU-CHUN WU   Group: iGEM16_NCTU_Formosa   (2016-10-14)


μ-segestritoxin-Sf1a


Introduction:

Figure 1. μ-segestritoxin-Sf1a

This year we create a revolutionary system that integrates biological pesticide, an automatic detector, a sprinkler, and IoT. We made a database that contains most of the spider toxins and selected the target toxins by programming. μ-segestritoxin-Sf1a is coded for the venom of a spider,Segestria florentina.

Figure 2. μ-segestritoxin-Sf1a structure

Mechanism of Sf1a:

μ-segestritoxin-Sf1a has a structure called ICK(inhibitor cysteine knot). This kind of structure contains four disulfide bonds. With this structure, Sf1a can resist the high temperature, acid-base solution and the digest juice of insect gut. Sf1a can bind on insect voltage-gated sodium channel, making it paralyze and die eventually.[1]

Features of Sf1a:

1. Non-toxic

μ-segestritoxin-Sf1a is non-toxic to mammals and bees. Since the structure of the target ion channel is different, μ-segestritoxin-Sf1a does not harm mammals and bees.[2] So it is safe to use it as a biological pesticide.


2. Biodegradable

The toxin is a peptide, so it must degrade over time. After degradation, the toxin will become nutrition in the soil.


3. Species-specific

According to reference, μ-segestritoxin-Sf1a has specificity to Lepidopteran (moths) and Dipteran (flies). So another insect such as bees will not be killed.


4. Eco-friendly

Compare with a chemical pesticide, μ-segestritoxin-Sf1a will not remain in soil and water so that it will not pollute the environment and won’t harm the ecosystem.

Together, using μ-segestritoxin-Sf1a is totally an environmentally friendly way for solving harmful insect problems by using this ion channel inhibitor as a biological pesticide.

Target insect:

Figure 3. Target insect

Experiment

Cloning


After assembling the DNA sequences from the basic parts, we recombined toxin gene to pSB1C3 backbones and conducted a PCR experiment to check the size of each part. The DNA sequence length of these parts is around 100-150 bp. In this PCR experiment, the toxin product's size should be near at 350-450 bp.
Figure 4.Sf1a
The DNA sequence length of Sf1a is around 100-150 b.p. In this PCR experiment, the product’s size should be close to 350-450 b.p.

Application of the part

1.Expressing


We chose E.coli Rosetta gami strain, which can form the disulfide bonds in the cytoplasm to express the protein. To verify the E.coli express the Sf1a with disulfide bonds, we treated the sample in two different ways. A means adding β-mercaptoethanol and sample buffer. β-mercaptoethanol can break the disulfide bonds of Sf1a and make it a linear form.

The other one adding sample buffer is the native form of Sf1a which maintains its structure. B is adding only sample buffer. The two samples are treated in boiling water for 15 mins. The SDS-PAGE shows that the native Sf1a is smaller than linear one because the disulfide bonds in Sf1a make the whole structure a globular shape.

Figure 5. Protein electrophoresis of PT7 + RBS + Sf1a+linker+6X His-Tag (control: Without constructed plasmid)
We can see the band of Sf1a at 5-6 kDa.
A: add β-mercaptoethanol and sample buffer
B: add sample buffer
Figure 6. Protein electrophoresis of PT7 + RBS + Sf1a+linker+Lectin+linker+6X His-Tag (control: Without constructed plasmid)
We can see the band of Sf1a-Lectin at 5-6 kDa.
A: add β-mercaptoethanol and sample buffer
B: add sample buffer

2.Purification


We sonicated the bacteria and purified the protein by 6X His-Tag behind the peptide using Nickel resin column. Then we ran the SDS-PAGE to verify the purification and analyze the concentration of Sf1a.

Figure 7. Protein electrophoresis of Sf1a purification.
A is the sonication product. B is the elution product of purification.
Figure 8. Protein electrophoresis of Sf1a-Lectin purification.
A is the sonication product. B is the elution product of purification.

Also, we use tabacco cutworm to test it's effect. Accoding to the Histogram show below, the dose response proof that Sf1a is really work. The negative control are water and the positive control are commercially available pesticides. Leaves in the table are direct results.


3.Modeling


According to reference, the energy of Ultraviolet will break the disulfide bonds and the toxicity is also decreased. To take the parameter into consideration for our automatic system, we modeled the degradation rate of the protein and modified the program in our device. Therefore, Pantide was tested under the ultraviolet light. The protein electrophoresis was shown below.
Figure 9. SDS-PAGE gel and the concentrations of UV radiolytic oxidation test to native μ-segestritoxin-Sf1a (Sf1a, 6.2 kDa). The samples are marked on the top of gel.

4. Device


We designed a device that contains detector, sprinkler, and integrated hardware with users by APP through IoT talk. We use an infrared detector to detect the number of the pest and predict what time to spray the farmland. Furthermore, other detectors like temperature, humidity, lamination, pressure of carbon dioxide and on also install in our device. At the same time, the APP would contact the users that all the information about the farmland and spray biological pesticides automatically. This device can make farmers control the farmland remotely.

Results

Pantide-expressed E. coli Rosetta gami strain and diluted it with the three concentration.We applied the sample onto the leaf disks and put five cutworms into the separate cabinets for feeding assays. The positive control in the experiment was to apply Bacillus thuringiensis, which is the most widely-used bioinsecticide. We preserved all the result of the remained leaves sealing with the glass paper and calculated the ratio of the remained area on the leaves. The collected data were analyzed by t – test. Here are the feeding assay results.


Figure 10. Above is leaves remainng area with of Negative control ( DDH2O ), Positive control ( Bacillus thuringiensis bacteria ), Sf1a+linker+His-Tag, Sf1a+linker+snowdrop-lectin+linker+His-Tag
Figure 11.Above are leaves with of Negative control ( DDH2O), Positive control ( Bacillus thuringiensis bacteria ), Sf1a+linker+6X His-Tag

Reference:

1. Monique J. Windley, Volker Herzig, Slawomir A. Dziemborowicz, Margaret C. Hardy, Glenn F. King and Graham M. Nicholson, “Spider-Venom Peptide as Bioinsecticide,” Toxins Review, 2012, 4, pp. 191-227.
2. Elaine Fitches, Martin G. Edwards, Christopher Mee, Eugene Grishin, Angharad M. R. Gatehouse, John P. Edwards, John A. Gatehouse “Fusion proteins containing insect-specific toxins as pest control agents: snowdrop lectin delivers fused insecticidal spider venom toxin to insect haemolymph following oral ingestion,” Journal of Insect Physiology, 2004,50, pp.61-71


Sequence and Features


Assembly Compatibility:
  • 10
    COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[10]
  • 12
    COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[12]
  • 21
    COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[21]
  • 23
    COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[23]
  • 25
    COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[25]
  • 1000
    COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[1000]


[edit]
Categories
//awards/part_collection/2016
Parameters
None