Not Released
Experience: Works
Not Used
Get This Part
Generator
Tamura

Part:BBa_K1763444:Design

Designed by: Fasih Ahsan   Group: iGEM15_UCLA   (2015-09-15)


Bombyx mori silk co-spinning module


Assembly Compatibility:
  • 10
    COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[10]
  • 12
    COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[12]
  • 21
    INCOMPATIBLE WITH RFC[21]
    Illegal BglII site found at 1448
    Illegal BamHI site found at 221
  • 23
    COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[23]
  • 25
    COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[25]
  • 1000
    INCOMPATIBLE WITH RFC[1000]
    Illegal BsaI site found at 1439
    Illegal BsaI.rc site found at 719


Design Notes

We decided to use a LacI promoter to regulate expression of the large protein construct in E. coli K12 laboratory strains, in lieu of utilizing a T7 promoter or constitutive Anderson family promoters. This is to maximize the protein yield of the co-spinning module without causing a tradeoff between regular cell growth and housekeeping protein synthesis. Additionally, we decided to use sfGFP as the reporter gene, instead of a standard mut3b GFP, due to the ability of sfGFP to function even when fused to large bulky protein domains (in this case, FibNT and FibCT). Lastly, we designed BsaI TypeIIS restriction sites flanking the reporter gene that when cut, generates sticky ends compatible with EcoRI and SpeI sites. This was created to allow iGEM teams to take protein domains of interest from the Standard Registry of Parts, and fuse them into the co-spinning module by a simple Digest and Ligate assembly to swap the sfGFP construct. However, the protein domain to be added must have the Silver Fusion prefix and suffix, to allow for in-frame cloning of the protein domain. Without this in-frame cloning, the scar sites of the tradition prefix and suffix will cause a frameshift mutation that mutate the translation product, and renders it non-functional.


Source

The LacI promoter (BBa_R0010), RBS (BBa_B0034), and super folder GFP (BBa_I746916) were derived from sequences found in the Standard Registry of Parts. The Bombyx mori silk fibroin heavy chain N-terminal (FibNT) and C-terminal (FibCT) domains were derived from the sequenced consensus genome of Bombyx mori silkworm species, and were synthesized using IDT gBlocks gene fragments.

References

1. Teulé, F. et al. A protocol for the production of recombinant spider silk-like proteins for artificial fiber spinning. Nat Protoc 4, 341–55 (2009). 2. Jansson, R. Strategies for Functionalization of Recombinant Spider Silk. 11, 76 (Acta Universitatis agriculturae Sueciae, 2015). 3. Gaines, W. A. & Marcotte, W. R. Identification and characterization of multiple Spidroin 1 genes encoding major ampullate silk proteins in Nephila clavipes. Insect Mol. Biol. 17, 465–74 (2008). 4. Kojima, K. et al. A new method for the modification of fibroin heavy chain protein in the transgenic silkworm. Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochem. 71, 2943–51 (2007). 5. Teulé, F. et al. Silkworms transformed with chimeric silkworm/spider silk genes spin composite silk fibers with improved mechanical properties. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 109, 923–8 (2012). 6. Vepari, C. & Kaplan, D. L. Silk as a Biomaterial. Prog Polym Sci 32, 991–1007 (2007). 7. Humenik, M., Scheibel, T. & Smith, A. Spider silk: understanding the structure-function relationship of a natural fiber. Prog Mol Biol Transl Sci 103, 131–85 (2011). 8. Lazaris, A. et al. Spider silk fibers spun from soluble recombinant silk produced in mammalian cells. Science 295, 472–6 (2002). 9. Sponner, A. et al. The conserved C-termini contribute to the properties of spider silk fibroins. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 338, 897–902 (2005). 10. Sponner, A. et al. Characterization of the protein components of Nephila clavipes dragline silk. Biochemistry 44, 4727–36 (2005). 11. Askarieh, G. et al. Self-assembly of spider silk proteins is controlled by a pH-sensitive relay. Nature 465, 236–8 (2010). 12. Landreh, M. et al. A pH-dependent dimer lock in spider silk protein. J. Mol. Biol. 404, 328–36 (2010). 13. Jansson, R. et al. Recombinant spider silk genetically functionalized with affinity domains. Biomacromolecules 15, 1696–706 (2014). 14. Gomes, S. C., Leonor, I. B., Mano, J. F., Reis, R. L. & Kaplan, D. L. Antimicrobial functionalized genetically engineered spider silk. Biomaterials 32, 4255–66 (2011). 15. Schacht, K. & Scheibel, T. Processing of recombinant spider silk proteins into tailor-made materials for biomaterials applications. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 29, 62–9 (2014). 16. Scheibel, T. Spider silks: recombinant synthesis, assembly, spinning, and engineering of synthetic proteins. Microb. Cell Fact. 3, 14 (2004). 17. Winkler, S. & Kaplan, D. L. Molecular biology of spider silk. J. Biotechnol. 74, 85–93 (2000). 18. Prince, J. T., McGrath, K. P., DiGirolamo, C. M. & Kaplan, D. L. Construction, cloning, and expression of synthetic genes encoding spider dragline silk. Biochemistry 34, 10879–85 (1995).