Difference between revisions of "Part:BBa K3185000"

Revision as of 03:18, 21 October 2019

SPYtag inserted Tm Encapsulin

Usage and Biology

TmEncapsulin is a protein found from Thermotoga maritima. A paper says that it consists of 60 monomers and forms capsule, Virus-like particle(VLP)[1]. iGEM also treats it as a useful part (BBa_K192000).

We used TmEncapsulin as a biological polymer. We inserted SpyTag in TmEncapsulin. This enables TmEncapsulin to display different types of proteins on the surface of the protein capsule. (See Fig.2) (SpyCatcher:BBa_K1159200, SpyTag:BBa_K1159201)[2]. SpyTag forms an isopeptide bond with SpyCatcher when they are mixed[3]. In previous research about TmEncap, it is showed peptides inserted after 138th amino acid in TmEncap can be exposed on the protein capsule as a loop[4]. Furthermore, “Bae et.al” showed when SpyTag is inserted at the same position, SpyCatcher/SpyTag also forms a bond between SpyCatcher and SpyTag inserted TmEncap (SpyTmEnc)[5].

Visual description of protein displaying

Also, this has three tag and cleavage sites. First is 6x-His tag placed in the C-terminus of TmEncapsulin for protein purification by using Ni-NTA beads. However, in a paper, Ni-NTA beads cannot bind to 6x-His tag added in C-terminus because it doesn’t display enough to the surface of the protein capsule[4]. To solve this problem, we inserted second tag. Second is HAtag inserted between TmEncapsulin and 6x-His tag in expectation of C-terminus to display on the surface of the capsule. Third is 6x-His-tag and linker inserted between #43 and #44 amino acids of native encapsulin for improving heat-resistance of TmEncapsulin. To design third one, we refered BBa_K2686002 of iGEM EPFL 2018 and the same paper. (BBa_K2686002)

We put it between the BamHI site and the Ndel site on pET11-a. We used BL21 (DE3) for gene expression. We used the Ni-NTA Agarose for purification. After that, we confirmed the molecular weight of SpyCatcher inserted TmEncapusulin by using SDS-PAGE.

Sequence and Features

Purification

Fig.1 SDS-PAGE of imidazole elutes, CBB stained

Expression

• Cells were grown in 200ml LB media (100μg/ml Ampicillin) at 37^oC shaking at 140 rpm to an OD600 of 0.5, verifying via a spectrophotometer.

• Protein was expressed in 0.1mM IPTG for 2hours.

Purification

1. E.coli which expressed this part were lysed with sonification.
2. Proteins are purified from lysate with Ni-NTA agarose(QIAGEN).
3. Imidazole eluates were visualized and confirmed by SDS-PAGE followed by CBB staining.

This purification method works. As shown in Fig.1, the protein successfully purified.

Result

Fig. 2 TmEncapsulin polymer appears as the peak.
TmEncapsulin expressed E. coli lysate and purified protein solution was loaded on 10%-60% sucrose linear gradient / 20 mM Tris 7.5, 50 mM NaCl, then centrifuged in 100,000g for 18 hours at 4℃ with SW41(Beckman). The solution was fractionated on a 96-well plate with BioComp. At the same time, 260nm absorption was measured.

Fig. 3 SDS-PAGE of the fraction
Lane1 is TmEncapsulin expressed E. coli lysate, lane 2 is purified protein, and lane 3 is 60th fraction. SDS-PAGE for 40min in 200V. CBB-stained.

Fig. 4 Isopeptide bond formation between Plastic binding proteins and Encapsulin.
3µL of SpyCatcher-Plastic-binding protein (SpyC-PBP) solution and 3µL of SpyTag inserted TmEncapsulin (SpyTmEnc) solution was mixed, then placed for 16h at room temperature. Then 6µL of 2x SDS sample buffer was added. 10µL of each sample was loaded. SDS-PAGE for 30min in 200V. The gel was CBB stained.

Fig. 5 Time development of SpyCatcher-SpyTag bond formation
3µL of SpyCatcher protein (SpyC) solution and 3µL of SpyTag inserted TmEncapsulin (SpyTmEnc) solution was mixed, then placed for several times at room temperature (10 min, 30 min, 60 min, 180 min, 360 min, 1200 min). The concentrations of protein solutions are SpyC: 500ng/µL SpyTmEnc: 1000ng/µL. The reaction was stopped by adding 2x SDS sample buffer. Mixed samples were assessed with SDS-PAGE for 30 min in 200V. CBB-stained.

Fig. 6 Quantification of conjugated band
Conjugated bands’ intensity was quantified with ImageJ. Orange dots show averages value of three experiments. Blacklines show standard deviations. The time point 60min was deleted because it included negative value.

Encapsulin properly make spherical polymer

We assessed the size of the protein polymer.
The TmEncapsulin purified and eluted from Ni-NTA was loaded on the top of 10%-60% linear sucrose gradient. The samples were ultracentrifuged in 100,000g for 18 hours at 4℃ with SW41(Beckman) and fractionated on a 96-well plate with BioComp. Absorbance 260 nm was monitored.

In Fig. 2, the blue line shows A260 of E. coli lysate (control). As shown in the figure, bacterial ribosomes are observed as peaks in the indicated position. The red line shows the A260 profile of eluted TmEncapsulin. Around the 60th fraction, a peak was clearly observed. As TmEncapsulin polymer’s size is 20 nm and the 70S bacterial ribosome’s size is also about 20 nm, this peak around 60th fraction looks exactly the TmEncapsulin spherical polymer. Interestingly, the first drop of the fractionation (the top of the fraction) was around 10 (signals between 1-9 can be attributed to air bubbles), showing that most of the A260 signal in the purified TmEncapsulin were collected in 70S-80S area, with almost no accumulation of monomer form.

In order to confirm that the 60th fraction’s peak result from TmEncapsulin, we examined the fraction with SDS-PAGE. In Fig.3, lane1 is TmEncapsulin expressed E. coli lysate, lane 2 is purified protein, and lane 3 is 60th fraction. As shown in lane 3, the 60th fraction properly has encapsulin. Taken together, we concluded that our TmEncapsulin conserves the spherical structure.

Protein conjugation thorough SpyCatcher/SpyTag system

The equal amount of SpyCatcher-Plastic-binding protein (SpyC-PBP) solution and SpyTag inserted TmEncapsulin (SpyTmEnc) solution were mixed and incubated for 16h at room temperature. Samples were taken and assessed with SDS-PAGE.

In Fig. 4, several kinds of combinations of proteins were shown. In lane 4 and 5, SpyTmEnc is loaded with or without SpyC. Only in lane 5, which is mixed with SpyC, the upper band appeared. The molecular weight of each protein is SpyC: 15.37k, SpyTmEnc: 37.04k, so the conjugated protein should be 52.41k. We concluded that the upper band is the conjugated protein. Likewise, as shown in lane 7 and 9, SpyC-PBPs are successfully conjugated to SpyTmEnc. As the negative control, we tested TmEncapsulin without SpyTag. As expected, TmEnc and SpyC did not produce conjugated protein as shown in lane 3.

These results show we successfully conjugated several proteins to Encapsulin by SpyTag-SpyCatcher system in vitro. This means that any protein with SpyCatcher can be efficiently and easily displayed on the surface of the protein capsule.

Time development of SpyCatcher-SpyTag bond formation

Next, we measured the time development of SpyCatcher-SpyTag bond formation. An equal amount of SpyCatcher protein (SpyC) and SpyTag inserted TmEncapsulin (SpyTmEnc) were mixed and incubated at room temperature. At different time points, 10 min, 30 min, 60 min, 180 min, 360 min, 1200 min, the reaction was stopped by adding 2x SDS sample buffer. Mixed samples were assessed with SDS-PAGE. The intensities of the conjugated bands were quantified.

As shown in Fig. 5, conjugated bands become evident gradually (labeled with arrow). Signals were quantified and summarized in Fig. 6. The reaction looks saturated after 360 minutes, even though substrates still remain a lot. This might be explained by water evaporation while incubation. Otherwise, it is possible that a bound protein prevents another protein from binding to near sites on a capsule cage. If it is the case, it might limit the number of binding proteins on a capsule.

References

1 Putri, R.M., Allende-Ballestero, C., Luque, D., Klem, R., Rousou, K.A., Liu, A., Traulsen, C.H.H., Rurup, W.F., Koay, M.S.T., Castón, J.R., et al. (2017).
Structural Characterization of Native and Modified Encapsulins as Nanoplatforms for in Vitro Catalysis and Cellular Uptake.
ACS Nano 11, 12796–12804.

2 Veggiani, G., Nakamura, T., Brenner, M.D., Gayet, R. V., Yan, J., Robinson, C. V., and Howarth, M. (2016).
Programmable polyproteams built using twin peptide superglues.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 113, 1202–1207.

3 Zakeri, B., Fierer, J.O., Celik, E., Chittock, E.C., Schwarz-Linek, U., Moy, V.T., and Howarth, M. (2012).
Peptide tag forming a rapid covalent bond to a protein, through engineering a bacterial adhesin.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 109.

4 Moon, H., Lee, J., Min, J., and Kang, S. (2014).
Developing genetically engineered encapsulin protein cage nanoparticles as a targeted delivery nanoplatform.
Biomacromolecules 15, 3794–3801.

5 Bae, Y., Kim, G.J., Kim, H., Park, S.G., Jung, H.S., and Kang, S. (2018).
Engineering Tunable Dual Functional Protein Cage Nanoparticles Using Bacterial Superglue.
Biomacromolecules 19, 2896–2904.