Difference between revisions of "Part:BBa K2656024"

 
Line 8: Line 8:
 
The LVA tag causes an increase in protease activity and, therefore, a faster degradation of the reporter protein in the cell.  
 
The LVA tag causes an increase in protease activity and, therefore, a faster degradation of the reporter protein in the cell.  
  
It can be combined with other compatible parts from our [http://2018.igem.org/Team:Valencia_UPV/Part_Collection Valencia UPV IGEM 2018 Printeria Collection] to assemble transcriptional units in a BsaI one-step reaction with the [http://2018.igem.org/Team:Valencia_UPV/Protocols Golden Gate assembly protocol].
+
It can be combined with other compatible parts from our [http://2018.igem.org/Team:Valencia_UPV/Part_Collection Valencia UPV IGEM 2018 Printeria Collection] to assemble transcriptional units in a BsaI one-step reaction with the <html><a href="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/parts/b/bc/T--Valencia_UPV--protocols.pdf#page=27"> Golden Gate assembly protocol </a></html>.
  
  

Latest revision as of 00:32, 18 October 2018

mRFP1_LVA Coding Sequence

domestication.
Figure 1. DNA basic parts domestication into GB. Third construction refers to promoter basic pieces.


Part BBa_K2656024 is the Monomeric red fluorescent protein with LVA degradation tag BBa_K1399001 adapted into the Golden Gate assembly method. Thus, it is a basic part compatible with both Biobrick and [http://2018.igem.org/Team:Valencia_UPV/Design GoldenBraid 3.0] grammar.

The LVA tag causes an increase in protease activity and, therefore, a faster degradation of the reporter protein in the cell.

It can be combined with other compatible parts from our [http://2018.igem.org/Team:Valencia_UPV/Part_Collection Valencia UPV IGEM 2018 Printeria Collection] to assemble transcriptional units in a BsaI one-step reaction with the Golden Gate assembly protocol .


Sequence and Features


Assembly Compatibility:
  • 10
    COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[10]
  • 12
    COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[12]
  • 21
    COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[21]
  • 23
    COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[23]
  • 25
    INCOMPATIBLE WITH RFC[25]
    Illegal AgeI site found at 556
    Illegal AgeI site found at 668
  • 1000
    COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[1000]