Coding

Part:BBa_K808026

Designed by: Marie Burghard, Henrik Cordes, Jascha Diemer, Adrian Eilingsfeld, Sven Jager, Philipp Rottmann, Rene Sahm, Arne Wehling   Group: iGEM12_TU_Darmstadt   (2012-09-02)

pNB-Est 13: Esterase PET cleaving enzyme

The pNB-ESterase13 is a mutant derived from pNB-Esterase from Bacillus licheniformis. It showed the highest affinity and activity towards PET.

Usage and Biology

The characterization of pNB-Esterase13 (pNB-Est13) occured in 3 different ways.

Our [http://2012.igem.org/Team:TU_Darmstadt/Labjournal/Simulation Simulation Lab] performed

Our [http://2012.igem.org/Team:TU_Darmstadt/Project/Material_Science Material Science Lab] performed

Our [http://2012.igem.org/Team:TU_Darmstadt/Project/Degradation Degradation Lab]


Docking Simulation

[http://2012.igem.org/Team:TU_Darmstadt/Modeling_Docking#Docking Docking Simulations]

Figure 1: Homology model of pNB-Esterase13, special thanks and regards to our Simulation Lab
We extracted binding energy from the atomic B-factors and the binding constant from the atomic property derived from all our calculations. We used scatter plots with the binding constant and the inhibition constant in order to compare the plasticizer as well as the PET substrate. We compared the binding energies as well as the inhibition constant from the best ranked docking runs.

Here, OET (dimeric state) became our reference substrate, meaning if an additive exhibits a higher inhibition constant it may effect our protein. Otherwise, if a binding energy exhibits a higher level than OET we can conclude that an additive may accumulate on our protein surface. Moreover, we compare the binding as well as the inhibition energies of the additives with itself to identify the strongest binder. Since we know the active site of the Fs. Cutinase and the PnB Est. 13, it will be interesting if a plastizicer may dock there. In order to analyze that, we counted the residues which are involved within every docking simulation. Therefore, we measured the distance of every ligand to its corresponding receptor with an appropriate threshold and thus identified the residues.


For the sake of convenience of this page, please visit our [http://2012.igem.org/Team:TU_Darmstadt/Modeling_Docking#Docking Simulation Lab > Docking Simulation] for further informtion.

Surface analysis of polyethylene terephthalat with atomic force microscopy

[http://2012.igem.org/Team:TU_Darmstadt/Labjournal/Material_Science#Surface_analysis_of_polyethylene_terephthalate_with_atomic_force_microscopy_.28AFM.29 Surface analysis of polyethylene terephthalat with atomic force microscopy] Atomic force microscopy is used to make very precise surface analysis up to nanometer scale. The goal was to indentify differences between different modifications of polyethylene terephthalate and to proof enzymatic degradation by changed surface properties.

Experiment

Pieces of PET foil were added to 2 µmol/L, 20 µmol/L and 50 µmol/L solutions of pNB-Est13. The solutions was constantly agitated in 50 mL falcon tubes. After 7 days the samples were washed with distilled water and dried in a cabinet dryer at 60 °C over night. Afterwards the samples are investigated using AFM. There was no surface modification at no concentration of pNB-Est13. The Pictures below show 3D models, height profiles and the cantilevers amplitude as well as the phase deviations. The 3D models give a first impression of the texture of the surface. Looking at the height profile and the amplitude deviation more detailed informations about the surface texture can be obtained. The reference samples show a very flat surface (±3 nm). Bigger deviations are due to manufactionary mistakes of the foil. pNB-Est13 treated surfaces show no change in their surface profile.

AFM of PET foil after pNB-Est13 exposure : (2 µmol/L)

3D EST2 2.jpg AFM EST2 1.jpg AFM EST2 1 Amplitude auto.jpg AFM EST2 1 Phase.jpg

AFM of PET foil after pNB-Est13 exposure : (20 µmol/L)

3D EST20 2.png AFM EST20 2.jpg AFM EST20 2 Amplitude auto.jpg AFM EST20 2 Phase.jpg

AFM of PET foil after pNB-Est13 exposure : (50 µmol/L)

3D EST50.png AFM EST50.jpg AFM EST50 Amplitude auto.jpg AFM EST50 Phase.jpg

AFM of PET foil as reference :

3D Referenz 2.png AFM Referenz 1.jpg AFM Referenz 1 Amplitude auto.jpg AFM Referenz 1 Phase.jpg

Enzyme Activity Assay

[http://2012.igem.org/Team:TU_Darmstadt/Labjournal/Degradation#Enzyme_Activity_Assays Enzyme activity assay]

pNP-Assay

We used a [http://2012.igem.org/Team:TU_Darmstadt/Protocols/pNP_Assay#pNP-Assay pNP-Assay] in order to describe.

Conditions were set at: T = 34°C and pH = 7.4. The method is simple. The absorption is measured every minute over 30 minutes by an ELISA reader capable of 96 well plates, after addition of enzyme. The released pNP-group has a typical absorption at 405nm wavelength.

The mechanism of pNPB degradation. The release of pNP is measured by the characteristic absorption at 405 nm


Lineweaver-Burk plot of the enzymatic activity of pNB-Esterase13. The kinectics were quantified by measuring the absorbtion at 405 nm over time. 405 nm is the characteristic absorption of pNP, being released due to hydrolytic activity of pNB-Est13
Km and Vmax calculation

To find Km the growth of the first seven data points were written down in a diagram. The slope of the regression line gave the speed of the hydrolysis for the single substrate concentrations. Now the value of the speed with the associated concentration of substrate were plotted in a Lineweaver-Burk diagram. At the point where the regression line is crossing the x-axis the x-coordinate amounts to -1/Km. So Km is about 400µM. To calculate the value of Vmax we used the point where the plotted line crosses the y-axis. The associated y-coordinate is 1/Vmax. Consequently Vmax for 50nM Est13 is 0,002798 1/s.

Kcat calculation

The value Kcat is calculated through dividing Vmax by the enzyme concentration of 50nM. Kcat counts 0,055951 1/mol*s.

Indicator Assay

For a more visual proof of enzymatic activity we used Monomethyl terephthalate as a substrate and FsC as a catalyst. We used [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bromothymol_blue bromthymol blue] as an indicator. The release of COOH groups, due to hydrolytic degradation by FsC results in a colometric change from green to blue. For a more detailed description please visit our [http://2012.igem.org/Team:TU_Darmstadt/Labjournal/Degradation#Degradation_of_monomethyl_terephthalate_over_time labjournal> Degradation of monomethyl terephthalate]

Principle of degradation of monomethyl terephthalate.
Day1: Degradation of monomethyl terephthalate. Left: with Est13(~0,8µM) Middle: with FSC(~8µM) Right: Negativ sample
Day8: Degradation of monomethyl terephthalate. Left: with Est13(~0,8µM) Middle: with FSC(~8µM) Right: Negativ sample

PET degradation

Principle and conditions
principle of hyrolytic PET degradation. Conditions: Room temperature (~ 22°C) pH = 7.4
Procedure

Round about 1g of PET granulate is added in each two falcon tubes to between 15 and 20 mL water of pH = 7.4 and several drops of bromthymol blue. In one of these falcon tubes pNB-Est13 stock solution is added until a concentration of 2,5 µM is reached. For 15 days the solutions are incubated at room temperature. At nine specific days of these the enzymatic solutions and the negative sample are photographed, to control the shift of pH.

Results

In all photos the degradation with Est13 is in the left falcon tube.

Day1:Degradation of PET. Left: With Est13(2,5µM) Right: Negative control
Day15:Degradation of PET. Left: With Est13(2,5µM) Right: Negative control

The photos show a decrease of the pH-value over time in the sample containing Est13. The one without this enzyme remains unchanged. So it is concluded that Est13 degrades PET granulate. Sequence and Features


Assembly Compatibility:
  • 10
    COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[10]
  • 12
    COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[12]
  • 21
    INCOMPATIBLE WITH RFC[21]
    Illegal BglII site found at 1071
  • 23
    COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[23]
  • 25
    INCOMPATIBLE WITH RFC[25]
    Illegal AgeI site found at 1142
  • 1000
    COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[1000]
[edit]
Categories
//cds/enzyme
//function/degradation
Parameters
protein