Coding

Part:BBa_K194001:Experience

Designed by: Christian Kaas   Group: iGEM09_DTU_Denmark   (2009-07-13)
Revision as of 01:41, 22 October 2009 by Kaas (Talk | contribs) (Applications of BBa_K194001)

This experience page is provided so that any user may enter their experience using this part.
Please enter how you used this part and how it worked out.

Applications of BBa_K194001

For the purpose of characterization, we connected the Cln2 (BBa_K194000) degradation signal downstream of GFP (BBa_K194001) and thereby created BBa_K194002. BBa_K194001 inserted on the same plasmid (pRS416: single copy yeast plasmid with URAA marker) without the degradation signal was used as reference. Both genes were expressed from the strong constitutive TEF promoter.

Results for a fermentation of the biobricks in a BioLector machine

Description of the construction of the plasmids can be found on our iGEM 2009 wiki at http://2009.igem.org/Team:DTU_Denmark/results

Growth rates (h-1) obtained for the two strains containing the two biobricks ( GFP_Cln and GFP) with glucose as carbon source

Strain

Growth Rate
GFP_Cln

0,080 ± 0,003

GFP

0,129 ± 0,001



The growth profile of these two strains in Glucose and in a mixed carbon source of Glucose and Galactose is presented bellow.

Growth profile of the yeast strain tranformed with the degradable GFP


Growth profile of the yeast strain tranformed with the non-degradable GFP



Both strains show very similar behavior. With Glucose as the solely carbon source, the curve presents a distinct exponential phase corresponding to the consumption of this substrate. After Glucose is consumed, OD seems to drop. Although there is not a decrease in cells, this drop might be due to morphological changes in the cells typical of a shift in the metabolism. As for the curves representing the mixed carbon, there are two exponential phases, the first corresponding to the glucose consumption and the second to the Galactose.
The next two graphs represent the variation of the GFP signal corrected and normalized with OD to subtract any variability that could come from the differences of growth



GFP signal, corrected and normalised for the degradable GFP


GFP signal, corrected and normalised for the non-degradable GFP


As one can see, there is a significant difference between this two constructs in terms of GFP signal. As expected, the signal from the degradable GFP is much lower than the signal showed by the non-degradable GFP, as the GFP that is not being degraded is accumulating and giving a stronger signal. This results go in line with the results published by Avery and Mateus [1] that state that the degradable GFP has a 14 times shorter half-life than the non-degradable. Therefore, based on this results we demontrate that the biobrick BBa_K194001 submited, presents a good option as a functionel GFP for yeast. We show that the addition of the sequence from Cln2 results in a strain with lower levels of GFP when the genes are expressed from the same promoter in plasmids with same copy number in the same strain.

References

[1] Mateus, C, Avery, S V 2000. Destabilized green fuorescent protein for monitoring dynamic changes in yeast gene expression with flow cytometry . Yeast 16:1313-1323.


===User Reviews=== BBa_K194001 StartReviews BBa_K194001 EndReviews