Composite

Part:BBa_K4164020

Designed by: Bo Cheng   Group: iGEM22_NAU-CHINA   (2022-09-30)
Revision as of 05:48, 12 October 2022 by XinDu (Talk | contribs)


Improvement

The improvement of NAU-CHINA this year is to integrate TEV protease and Ssr tag to construct BBa_K4164020 in order to control the degradation of mRFP and resolve the leakage problem of BBa_J04450.

TEV cleavage site (ENLYFQS) and ssr tag (AANDENYAAV) are inserted into the C-terminus of RFP in turn (Fig.1). Meanwhile, the TEV protease is expressed also driven by Plac. The ssr tag can lead to the degradation of RFP expressed without IPTG. When induced by IPTG, the TEV protease can be inductively expressed, and cleave specifically at the cleavage site, which results in the loss of ssr tag in RFP, and RFP lost the degradation tag will no longer be degraded and begin to work.

Fig.1 Improvement of mRFP expression device.


The leakage level of BBa_K4164020 is lower compared with BBa_J04450 and BBa_K4164021. What’s more, due to the absence of TEV protease, the fluorescence intensity of BBa_K4164022 is poor regardless of whether there is IPTG induction. However, the relative fluorescence intensity of BBa_K4164020 and BBa_J04450 are similar in the condition of IPTG induction, which suggests the ssr tag has little influence on the expression of RFP under normal circumstances.

Fig.2 the result of improvement.
a. the variation of fluorescence intensity/OD of BBa_K4164020, BBa_J04450, BBa_K4164021 and BBa_K4164022 cultivated with or without IPTG induction;
b. the fluorescence intensity/OD of BBa_K4164020, BBa_J04450 and BBa_K4164021 cultivated without IPTG induction;
c. the fluorescence intensity of BBa_K4164020, BBa_J04450, BBa_K4164021, BBa_K4164022 and Control cultivated with IPTG after 12 hours;
d. the fluorescence intensity of BBa_K4164020, BBa_J04450, BBa_K4164021, BBa_K4164022 and Control cultivated without IPTG after 12 hours.



Sequence and Features


Assembly Compatibility:
  • 10
    COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[10]
  • 12
    COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[12]
  • 21
    INCOMPATIBLE WITH RFC[21]
    Illegal BamHI site found at 1694
  • 23
    COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[23]
  • 25
    INCOMPATIBLE WITH RFC[25]
    Illegal AgeI site found at 814
    Illegal AgeI site found at 926
  • 1000
    COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[1000]


[edit]
Categories
Parameters
None