Part:BBa_K518007
cheZ expression cassette (no promoter)
CheZ is responsible for the dephosphorylation of flagellum-regulating protein CheY. It has been reported that cheZ-/- strain has a higher frequency of direction change and thus a narrower range of mobility. With a promoter of your interest, this device rescues the mobility of cheZ-/- cells.
Molecular Biology
The CheZ intracellular signaling cascade is started by detection of a chemoattractant(1). Four cytoplasmic proteins, CheA, CheW, CheY and CheZ, are involved in this pathway(2).
When not stimulated, E. coli flagella rotate CCW (counter-clockwise), so they swim straight. Increasing concentrations of attractant or decreasing concentrations of repellant activate chemoreceptors. When a repellant binds, the CheA (a histidine kinase) and CheW proteins bind to the cytoplasmic domain of the receptor protein, the binding causing CheA to be phosphorylated (1). Phosphorylated CheA phosphorylates CheY protein which then binds to the motor of the flagellum, making it switch rotation from CCW to CW (clockwise) (3). This change results in the bacteria tumbling.
Work done by Welch et al. (3) showed that CheY protein is active only when phosphorylated. The dephosphorylation and inactivation of CheY is regulated by CheZ protein (1). It has been suggested that mutants lacking cheZ tumble more often than those possessing this protein (2).
Reference
1. Alberts et al. (1992) Cell Signaling Cell Biology Chapter 15:773-778.
2. Parkinson J. S.(1993) Signal transduction Schemes of Bacteria [Review]. Cell . 73(5): 857-871.
3. Welch, M. et al.(1993) Phosphorylation Dependent Binding of a Signal Molecule to the Flagellar Switch of Bacteria. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 90: 8787-8791.
Usage
We performed a swarming assay to characterize the motility of cheZ-deficient strain and cells transformed with a plasmid containing this device. (BBa_K518006).
Our results clearly show that cheZ-deficient mutants show smaller diffusion, while the motility is rescued by our BBa_K518006 plasmid.
motility.png)
;
;
<Fig.1: The diffusion of colonies expressing cheZ in an IPTG-dependent manner. The 2nd to 5th photographs are representatives of colonies on a 0.25% agar plate containing 1, 10, 40, 100µM IPTG, respectively. The 1st picture is a negative control (they are not transformed with this device). >
;
<Fig.2: The comparison of colony size. The colony size was an indicator of cell diffusion which we used. The images of colonies were thresholded and segmentized. The relative colony size was determined by the pixel number of the segmented region. A) Graph plot. B) Bar chart plot. Data was expressed as mean±S.D.. n=6.> Sequence and Features
- 10COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[10]
- 12COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[12]
- 21COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[21]
- 23COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[23]
- 25COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[25]
- 1000COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[1000]
| None |