Not Released
Experience: Works
Not Used
Get This Part
Project
DarR

Part:BBa_K1045017:Experience

Designed by: iGEM Team Göttingen 2013   Group: iGEM13_Goettingen   (2013-09-20)
Revision as of 15:38, 19 October 2013 by FMCommmichau (Talk | contribs) (→‎Characterization of the Reporter System in a Multi-Well Plate Reader)


This experience page is provided so that any user may enter their experience using this part.
Please enter how you used this part and how it worked out.

Applications of BBa_K1045017

The DarR Reporter System

Microscope Data

As described on our [http://2013.igem.org/Team:Goettingen/Project Wiki], we designed a c-di-AMP-sensing screening system for the Gram-negative bacterium Escherichia coli. Using this system, we can screen for substances that compete with c-di-AMP for binding to essential target proteins. Promising substances that bind these proteins might serve as a starting point for developing novel antibiotics that kill multi-resistant pathogenic bacteria. Since c-di-AMP is not present in E. coli and thus not needed for growth, we can sort out those substances that simply kill the bacteria and do not bind to c-di-AMP-binding proteins!


To characterize the DarR reporter system, the E. coli strain BL21 was transformed either with BBa_K1045017 or with BBa_K1045013 as a control. In BBa_K1045013, gfp is placed downstream of a strong promoter and the DarR operator. This vector does not encode DarR. The strong fluorescence signal of cells transformed with BBa_K1045013 indicated that GFP was produced. However, when transformed with BBa_K1045017 (Fig. 1), the bacteria showed almost no fluorescence signal. In contrast to BBa_K1045013, BBa_K1045017 encodes the repressor DarR. The low fluorescence signal suggests that DarR was synthesized and fully active as a repressor that prevents gfp transcription by binding to the DarR operator. Hence, DarR seems to act as a strong repressor in E. coli even in the absence of c-di-AMP.


Fig. 1.: Top: E. coli cells that harbor plasmid encoding BBa_K1045013 show a strong green fluorescence signal when analyzed with a fluorescence microscope. Bottom: E. coli harboring the plasmid that contains the complete DarR reporter system BBa_K1045017 do not emit a green fluorescence signal. Both pictures represent merges of a bright field image and a GFP channel image. The exposure time used to record GFP fluorescence was in both cases 2 seconds. +DarR.jpg
Characterization of the Reporter System in a Multi-Well Plate Reader

In addition the microscopic analyses, we monitored growth of the E. coli reporter strain and the green light that is emitted by the bacteria. The plate reader experiments were performed to quantify the capability of DarR of binding to the DarR operator in vivo. The results of the experiments are summarized in Fig. 2 and Fig. 3. Growth was measured at a wavelength of 600 nm (Fig. 2) and light at a wavelength of 509 nm was recorded to measure GFP production (Fig. 3). For each measurement, three technical and two biological replicates were used. The graphs show the mean value of the technical replicates and of one biological replicate. As described in the figure legend, different amounts of c-di-AMP were added to the small-scall cultures in order to test whether the DNA-binding affinity of DarR is increased by the cyclic di-nucleotide. Experimental setup: total recording time 21 h; data were collected every 15 min; the cells were grown at 37°C in the medium shaking mode; cells were grown in LB medium supplemented in a sterile 96-well micro titer plate; Synergy Mx Monochromator-Based Multi-Mode Microplate Reader; Gen5 V2.01 Software (BioTek).

Fig. 2: Top: Growth curve of cells harboring the DarR construct; Bottom: Growth curve of the GFP control (cells containing the reporter system that lack the DarR repressor). Please enlarge the pictures for better reading by clicking on them. GFP Control Growth cdiAMP.png
Fig. 2: Top: Fluorescence signals of the cells with the riboswitch construct; Bottom: Fluorescence signals of the GFP control. Please enlarge the pictures for better reading by clicking on them.GFP Control Fluorescence cdiAMP.png


As revealed by the microscopic studies (see above), DarR prevented expression of the reporter, even without c-di-AMP. It has been reported previously that binding of DarR to its operator is stimulated by c-di-AMP. However, in our experiments the addition of c-di-AMP, regardless of the concentration used, had no effect on the gfp expression. This data indicated a high-affinity binding of DarR to its operator in E. coli, even in the abscence of c-di-AMP.

In conclusion, the experiments showed that the cells can grow with the construct, and that DarR is highly active as a repressor. In the future, mutagenesis of the operator sequence (e.g., singly nucleotide exchanges) or the binding motive in the protein might decrease the interaction between DarR and the operator. This seems to be the appropriate approach to monitor DNA-binding activity of DarR in the presence of different amounts of c-di-AMP. Intermediate GFP expression leves for BBa_K1045017 would allow to screen for compounds that compete with c-di-AMP for binding to non-essential and essential target proteins without killing Gram-negative bacteria that harbor the reporter system. Our system might be a promising starting point to identify novel antibiotics that kill Gram-positive pathogenic bacteria.

In addition to this, regarding the current binding strength of DarR (BBa_K1045001) to its operator (BBa_K1045000), the two novel biobricks might be used for the construction of an "inverter". In case the expression of darR were controlled by an inducible promoter (e.g., IPTG-dependent), DarR would prevent transcription of a gene of interest (goi) connected to the DarR operator sequence in the presence of the inducer. By contrast, in the absence of the inducer, DarR is not formed an the goi is transcribed.

User Reviews

UNIQebcc8b46408cdf2f-partinfo-00000000-QINU UNIQebcc8b46408cdf2f-partinfo-00000001-QINU