BBa K731700 and BBa K731710 measurements

Revision as of 13:23, 22 September 2012 by Giacomo (Talk | contribs) (→‎PROTOCOL DEVELOPMENT:)

Hello world

In this page we are really proud to introduce you the protocol we (Giacomo and Anna) developed for the characterization transcriptional terminators effects on gene expression. (Tested on BBa_J64997)

The develop of this protocolcost us not only sleepless night but also sunny and beautiful weekend of trekking so take a hot cup of tea and read it all.


IN VIVO ANALYSIS

BEFORE STARTING:


  • In order to analyse terminators through this method is necessary to follow the entire procedure with both the platform without intervening terminator (control) and the platform with terminator (sample).


CELLS GROWTH AND SAMPLES PREPARATION (starting from a glycerol stock):


  • 100ul of cells (i.e. BL21(DE3) pLysS) tranformed with the platform (control or sample) in 10 ml fresh Luria Bertani medium (LB)

NOTE1:Antibiotic are at concentration of 0.1mg/ml ampicillin and 0.035mg/ml cloranphenicol

NOTE2:Four glycerol stocks for both control and sample will give you a good level of significance

  • Grow the cultures at 37°C in the termoshaker until optical density at 600nm (O.D.) ~ 0.4 (the O.D. at which you stop the sample is not important until it is major than 0.2.)
  • (chill on ice for the whole duration of this point) Dilute samples to OD 0.2 in order to have the same O.D. at the moment of induction.
    • x = 10ml*0.2 O.D./0.4 O.D. (where x are the ml of culture you need to take from the culture in the termoshaker)
    • LB = 10ml-x (where LB are the ml of LB you need to add to x to obtain OD 0.2)
  • Grow 37°C in the termoshaker until O.D. ~ 0.6.
  • Induce with 0.5mM Isopropyl β-D-1-thiogalactopyranoside (IPTG).
  • 3 hours induction at 37°C in the termoshaker.
  • Chill falcon on ice
  • Move 1ml of induced culture to an eppendorf.
  • Sonication (3 repetition of 10 s 50% amplitude sonication and 30 s of pause).
  • 1.5 min centrifuge (4000rpm).
  • Move supernatant from eppendorf to cuvette.
  • Add 1 mL buffer (i.e.: PBS)
  • Leave the cuvettes over night (O.N.) it the 4°C fridge
  • Fluorimetric measurements



PROTOCOL DEVELOPMENT:

Emission and Excitation parameter choise:

The emission and excitation parameters must be aimed at achievement of the maximum distance between the two points at which you take emission measurements and the maximum comparability in terms of fluorescence intensity according to the limits imposed by the two fluorescent proteins in use.


Example: The two proteins in use in BBa_K731700 and BBa_K731710 are mCherry and A206K Venus (mVenus). After excitation of the two proteins with standard parameters we note a huge difference in fluorescence intensity between the two proteins; moreover the proximity between the excitation wavelenght and the emission peak can easily influence the measurements. In this case a shift of the brighter protein (mVenus) excitation wavelenght toward smaller wavelenght can bring several benefits:

  • A decrease in fluorescene intensity
  • A larger distance between the excitation wavelenght and the emission peak


The same approach for the less bright protein (mCherry) is not exploitable since would have the effect of further reducing the emission peak intensity; the better way to have a lower influence on the emission peak due to the proximity to the excitation wavelenght is to use a wavelenght different from the emission peak for measurements (point with a bigger wasvelenght).


Standard Excitation (nm) Standard Emission (nm) Modified Excitation (nm) Modified Emission (nm)
mCherry 587 609 587 615
mVenus 515 528 485 528

TABLE 1. Standard and modified excitation and emission wavelengths

Wls K731700 570V.jpg Wls K731710 520V.jpg

CHART 1A/B: Emission scan of BBa_K731700 (A) and BBa_K731710 (B) with standard and modified excitation wavelenght (instrument: Varian Cary Eclipse, voltage: 570 V (A) and 520 V (B)

Sonication of the samples:

In order to reduce the scattering (signal due to excitation light in proximity of the excitation wavelenght) and to have a clear signal, we decided to sonicate our sample before measure them. Both the improvement are due to the lower O.D. of a sonicated sample if compared to the one of a cell suspension sample. A bigger O.D. means in fact a decrease in the amount of light emitted by the fluorescent proteins that reach the sensor (light that), a decrease in the light that actually reach the fluorescent proteins and an icrease of the excitation light that is reflected to the sensor (increase in scattering).