Difference between revisions of "Part:BBa K346004:Experience"
Spring zhq (Talk | contribs) (→Results:) |
Spring zhq (Talk | contribs) (→Results:) |
||
| Line 20: | Line 20: | ||
'''Expression of proteins''' | '''Expression of proteins''' | ||
| − | The plasmid PET21a- | + | The plasmid PET21a-MBP was transformed to E.coli strain BL21. Both induced cells and uninduced cells(as control) were centrifuged to get the cytosol, the periplasm and the membrane separated. The SDS-PAGE and Western blotting of the expressed proteins showed that induced cells expressed an identical IPTG-inducible protein at the proper place with the size of ~12kD as expected, indicating that the engineered MBP can be expressed in the cytosol. |
[[Image:results of MBP(Pb).jpg]] | [[Image:results of MBP(Pb).jpg]] | ||
Revision as of 04:05, 28 October 2010
This experience page is provided so that any user may enter their experience using this part.
Please enter
how you used this part and how it worked out.
Construction of BBa_K346004
Just as what we have done to construct the mercury Metal Binding Peptide, the entire coding region of the MBP for standard part was amplified by PCR from full length PbrR with two pairs of primers. Two of these primers encoded a three-residue bridge, SSG, which does not occur in PbrR and was added to afford some flexibility in the loop connecting the two dimerization helix. The two PCR products were digested with EcoR I / BspEI, or BspEI / Pst I and cloned into EcoR I / Pst I -digested pSB1K3 bybone step (Fig above), which was verified by DNA sequencing. Then the RBS and terminator was prefixed and suffixed.
Based on the similar method, MBP-His6 was constructed by using two different pairs of primers, which was used for western blotting. The two PCR products were digested with Nde I / BspEI, or BspEI / Xho I and cloned into Nde I / Xho I -digested pET 21a backbone which contains a six his tag downstream. Cloning was verified by DNA sequencing.
Expression Experiment and Function Test:
To test the function of this part, both expression experiment and function test is necessary. We have verified the size of the expressed proteins with SDS-PAGE and Western blotting. Besides, to test the efficiency of mercury binding, we also carried out the function test with ICP-AES
Results:
Expression of proteins
The plasmid PET21a-MBP was transformed to E.coli strain BL21. Both induced cells and uninduced cells(as control) were centrifuged to get the cytosol, the periplasm and the membrane separated. The SDS-PAGE and Western blotting of the expressed proteins showed that induced cells expressed an identical IPTG-inducible protein at the proper place with the size of ~12kD as expected, indicating that the engineered MBP can be expressed in the cytosol.
.jpg)
The specific band in western blot for his-tag fused MBP of about 12 kD confirmed that the MBP is expressed as expected. Considerable amount of MBP expressed in cytosol can be indicated from the result of SDS-PAGE.
Function test
Having made sure that the protein can express normally in the cytosol, the function tests experiment are carried out with ICP-AES. To test the efficiency of mercury absorption of MBP in different concentration of mercury, the concentration gradient of lead is set from 10^-7M to 10^-5M （the results are not shown in the following figure). The results of the efficiency of different parts containing MBP(lead) is shown here. It is apparent that under the concentration of 10^-5M,there is a notable absorption of lead compared to the control. What's more, the device containing three parts are more efficient than the parts alone.
Figure 2 Different amount of lead absorbed by bacteria with MBP expressed in different subcellular compartments cultured for ~40h in 10-5 mol/L Pb (II) medium. .
User Reviews
UNIQf39e684deba27938-partinfo-00000000-QINU UNIQf39e684deba27938-partinfo-00000001-QINU